PT-TOPSIS methods for multi-attribute group decision making under single-valued neutrosophic sets

IF 0.6 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Yue Li, Q. Cai, G. Wei
{"title":"PT-TOPSIS methods for multi-attribute group decision making under single-valued neutrosophic sets","authors":"Yue Li, Q. Cai, G. Wei","doi":"10.3233/kes-230039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multi-attribute group decision making (MAGDM) is a flexible and complex problem due to multiple factors. Decision makers have different preferences in the face of different risks and benefits. In this paper, it proposed that the extended single-valued neutrosophic TOPSIS method based on the prospect theory (SVN-PT-TOPSIS) can be widely applied to MAGDM. It provides decision-makers with more rigorous decision-making methods. The purpose is to make the results more objective and fair and to reduce subjective errors. This paper is applied in a single-value neutrosophic sets (SVNSs) environment, which contains membership value, uncertainty value and non-membership value, and can effectively reflect the fuzzy decision state of decision makers. It also combines the CRITIC method to determine the weights and considers the psychological state of decision makers according to the prospect theory, which can effectively reduce the influence of subjective preferences on decision making. The innovations of this paper are mainly as follows. Firstly, after the score function determines the positive and negative ideal values, using the distance formula reflects the distance between each single-value neutrosophic number (SVNN) and the positive and negative ideal values. We will feel the overall quality of each scheme more directly. Secondly determine the weights using the CRITIC method based on the distance matrix of each SVNN from the negative ideal. This is not a subjective decision weight, so the influence of personal preferences on the decision can be avoided. Thirdly, the composite profit value and the composite loss value are confirmed based on the prospect theory (PT), taking into account the decision maker’s risk preferences. Finally, use the relative profit loss ratio to rank the programs. After case analysis, other classical decisionmaking methods are selected for comparative analysis of the extended TOPSIS It is confirmed that the SVN-PT-TOPSIS method is reasonable and effective, which is suitable for MAGDM problems.","PeriodicalId":44076,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Engineering Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Engineering Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/kes-230039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Multi-attribute group decision making (MAGDM) is a flexible and complex problem due to multiple factors. Decision makers have different preferences in the face of different risks and benefits. In this paper, it proposed that the extended single-valued neutrosophic TOPSIS method based on the prospect theory (SVN-PT-TOPSIS) can be widely applied to MAGDM. It provides decision-makers with more rigorous decision-making methods. The purpose is to make the results more objective and fair and to reduce subjective errors. This paper is applied in a single-value neutrosophic sets (SVNSs) environment, which contains membership value, uncertainty value and non-membership value, and can effectively reflect the fuzzy decision state of decision makers. It also combines the CRITIC method to determine the weights and considers the psychological state of decision makers according to the prospect theory, which can effectively reduce the influence of subjective preferences on decision making. The innovations of this paper are mainly as follows. Firstly, after the score function determines the positive and negative ideal values, using the distance formula reflects the distance between each single-value neutrosophic number (SVNN) and the positive and negative ideal values. We will feel the overall quality of each scheme more directly. Secondly determine the weights using the CRITIC method based on the distance matrix of each SVNN from the negative ideal. This is not a subjective decision weight, so the influence of personal preferences on the decision can be avoided. Thirdly, the composite profit value and the composite loss value are confirmed based on the prospect theory (PT), taking into account the decision maker’s risk preferences. Finally, use the relative profit loss ratio to rank the programs. After case analysis, other classical decisionmaking methods are selected for comparative analysis of the extended TOPSIS It is confirmed that the SVN-PT-TOPSIS method is reasonable and effective, which is suitable for MAGDM problems.
单值嗜中性集下多属性群决策的PT-TOPSIS方法
多属性群体决策是一个受多种因素影响的灵活而复杂的问题。面对不同的风险和收益,决策者有不同的偏好。本文提出了基于前景理论的扩展单值嗜中性TOPSIS方法(SVN-PT-TOPSIS)可以广泛应用于MAGDM。它为决策者提供了更严格的决策方法。目的是使结果更加客观公正,减少主观误差。本文应用于单值嗜中性集(SVNSs)环境,该环境包含隶属度值、不确定性值和非隶属度值,能够有效反映决策者的模糊决策状态。结合CRITIC方法确定权重,根据前景理论考虑决策者的心理状态,可以有效降低主观偏好对决策的影响。本文的创新点主要有以下几点。首先,分数函数确定正负理想值后,利用距离公式反映出各单值中性粒细胞数(SVNN)与正负理想值之间的距离。我们将更直接地感受到每个方案的整体质量。其次,根据SVNN到负理想的距离矩阵,采用CRITIC方法确定权重;这不是一个主观的决策权重,因此可以避免个人偏好对决策的影响。第三,在考虑决策者风险偏好的基础上,基于前景理论确定综合利润价值和综合损失价值。最后,使用相对损益比对项目进行排名。通过案例分析,选取其他经典决策方法对扩展TOPSIS进行对比分析,验证了SVN-PT-TOPSIS方法的合理性和有效性,适用于MAGDM问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信