Striving toward Community-Engaged and Participatory Methods: Considerations for Researchers in Academic Settings

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q3 SOCIAL WORK
S. Narendorf, Samira Ali, C. Lea, Suzanne Pritzker
{"title":"Striving toward Community-Engaged and Participatory Methods: Considerations for Researchers in Academic Settings","authors":"S. Narendorf, Samira Ali, C. Lea, Suzanne Pritzker","doi":"10.1093/swr/svac029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Community-engaged and participatory methods are increasingly used by academic researchers. Power dynamics in academia shape the landscape in which researchers implement these methods, yet are rarely understood and intentionally addressed. Through the lens of social work researchers at different career stages, this article describes how power relations within academia present challenges to community-engaged and participatory research across four stages of the research process (participant/researcher relationship, study formulation, conducting research, and publication/dissemination). These challenges are located within four domains of power identified by intersectionality scholars: Institutional policies such as those for tenure and promotion and for research administration presented challenges with the structural domain. Decisions about how to implement and enforce policies and operationalize what counts for tenure and promotion were identified as challenges within the disciplinary domain. Norms about who belongs on a university campus and what types of research are valued exemplified the cultural domain, while dynamics about who is viewed as an expert exemplified challenges the interpersonal domain. Across the research process, the article identifies potential solutions and suggests strategies for intentional consideration by academic researchers and their institutions to conduct meaningful, inclusive, and socially just research that shares power with community.","PeriodicalId":47282,"journal":{"name":"Social Work Research","volume":"380 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Work Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/svac029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Community-engaged and participatory methods are increasingly used by academic researchers. Power dynamics in academia shape the landscape in which researchers implement these methods, yet are rarely understood and intentionally addressed. Through the lens of social work researchers at different career stages, this article describes how power relations within academia present challenges to community-engaged and participatory research across four stages of the research process (participant/researcher relationship, study formulation, conducting research, and publication/dissemination). These challenges are located within four domains of power identified by intersectionality scholars: Institutional policies such as those for tenure and promotion and for research administration presented challenges with the structural domain. Decisions about how to implement and enforce policies and operationalize what counts for tenure and promotion were identified as challenges within the disciplinary domain. Norms about who belongs on a university campus and what types of research are valued exemplified the cultural domain, while dynamics about who is viewed as an expert exemplified challenges the interpersonal domain. Across the research process, the article identifies potential solutions and suggests strategies for intentional consideration by academic researchers and their institutions to conduct meaningful, inclusive, and socially just research that shares power with community.
努力实现社区参与和参与式方法:学术环境下研究人员的考虑
学术研究人员越来越多地使用社区参与和参与式方法。学术界的权力动力学塑造了研究人员实施这些方法的环境,但很少被理解和有意地解决。通过不同职业阶段的社会工作研究人员的视角,本文描述了学术界的权力关系如何在研究过程的四个阶段(参与者/研究者关系、研究制定、进行研究和发表/传播)对社区参与和参与式研究提出挑战。这些挑战位于由交叉性学者确定的四个权力领域:制度政策,如任期和晋升以及研究管理,在结构领域提出了挑战。关于如何实施和执行政策以及如何对任期和晋升进行操作的决定被认为是学科领域内的挑战。关于谁属于大学校园以及重视什么类型的研究的规范是文化领域的例证,而关于谁被视为专家的动态则是人际领域的挑战。在整个研究过程中,本文确定了潜在的解决方案,并提出了学术研究人员及其机构有意考虑的策略,以开展有意义、包容和社会公正的研究,与社区分享权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Work Research
Social Work Research SOCIAL WORK-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Social work research addresses psychosocial problems, preventive interventions, treatment of acute and chronic conditions, and community, organizational, policy and administrative issues. Covering the lifespan, social work research may address clinical, services and policy issues. It benefits consumers, practitioners, policy-makers, educators, and the general public by: •Examining prevention and intervention strategies for health and mental health, child welfare, aging, substance abuse, community development, managed care, housing, economic self-sufficiency, family well-being, etc.; Studying the strengths, needs, and inter-relationships of individuals, families, groups, neighborhoods, and social institutions;
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信