A Faster, Novel Technique to Detect COVID-19 Neutralizing Antibodies.

Wei-Huai Chiu, Wei-Yi Kong, Yu-Jang Su, Jyun-Wei Wen, Ciao-Ming Tsai, Chitsung Hong, Pang-Yen Chen, Cheng-Hao Ko
{"title":"A Faster, Novel Technique to Detect COVID-19 Neutralizing Antibodies.","authors":"Wei-Huai Chiu, Wei-Yi Kong, Yu-Jang Su, Jyun-Wei Wen, Ciao-Ming Tsai, Chitsung Hong, Pang-Yen Chen, Cheng-Hao Ko","doi":"10.12659/MSM.935812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has spread globally in a short period of time. It is known that antibody (nAb) level can effectively predict vaccine efficacy, which leads to the exploration of vaccine trials for efficacy assessment. Thus, the current study aimed to develop a platform to quantify nAb levels faster, at lower cost, and with better efficiency. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 69 sera samples were collected for the research, 28 of which were from unvaccinated participants. The other 27 samples and the remaining 14 samples were from the participants who had received the first and second dose, respectively, of AZ vaccine 1 month before. With cPass assays (Genscript cPass nAb ELISA assay) used as a criterion standard and lateral flow immunoassay kit (Healgen Scientific - LFIA test kit) coupled with a spectrometer (LFIA+S) for checking each specimen, we aimed to detect the presence of neutralizing antibodies in sera and to confirm the relationship between the inhibition rate from cPass assays and the nAb index from the LFIA+S. RESULTS Data analysis of the research were taken from the certified ELISA and LFIA+S, which indicated a high consistency (Pearson's r =0.864; ICC=0.90138) between the 2 methods. CONCLUSIONS The dataset demonstrated that LFIA+S was affordable, had a strong correlation with results of the cPass nAbs detection kit, and has potential clinical applications, with an exclusive feature that allows non-experts to use it with ease. It is believed that the proposed platform can be promoted in the near future.</p>","PeriodicalId":90591,"journal":{"name":"Journal of electroanalytical chemistry and interfacial electrochemistry","volume":"369 1","pages":"e935812"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9344884/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of electroanalytical chemistry and interfacial electrochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.935812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has spread globally in a short period of time. It is known that antibody (nAb) level can effectively predict vaccine efficacy, which leads to the exploration of vaccine trials for efficacy assessment. Thus, the current study aimed to develop a platform to quantify nAb levels faster, at lower cost, and with better efficiency. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 69 sera samples were collected for the research, 28 of which were from unvaccinated participants. The other 27 samples and the remaining 14 samples were from the participants who had received the first and second dose, respectively, of AZ vaccine 1 month before. With cPass assays (Genscript cPass nAb ELISA assay) used as a criterion standard and lateral flow immunoassay kit (Healgen Scientific - LFIA test kit) coupled with a spectrometer (LFIA+S) for checking each specimen, we aimed to detect the presence of neutralizing antibodies in sera and to confirm the relationship between the inhibition rate from cPass assays and the nAb index from the LFIA+S. RESULTS Data analysis of the research were taken from the certified ELISA and LFIA+S, which indicated a high consistency (Pearson's r =0.864; ICC=0.90138) between the 2 methods. CONCLUSIONS The dataset demonstrated that LFIA+S was affordable, had a strong correlation with results of the cPass nAbs detection kit, and has potential clinical applications, with an exclusive feature that allows non-experts to use it with ease. It is believed that the proposed platform can be promoted in the near future.

更快检测 COVID-19 中和抗体的新技术。
背景 COVID-19 大流行在短时间内蔓延全球。众所周知,抗体(nAb)水平能有效预测疫苗的疗效,因此人们开始探索疫苗试验的疗效评估。因此,本研究旨在开发一种能更快、更低成本、更高效地量化 nAb 水平的平台。材料与方法 本研究共收集了 69 份血清样本,其中 28 份来自未接种疫苗的参与者。其余 27 份样本和 14 份样本分别来自 1 个月前接种第一剂和第二剂 AZ 疫苗的参与者。我们使用 cPass 检测法(Genscript cPass nAb ELISA 检测法)作为标准,并使用侧流免疫检测试剂盒(Healgen Scientific - LFIA 检测试剂盒)和光谱仪(LFIA+S)检测每个样本,目的是检测血清中是否存在中和抗体,并确认 cPass 检测法得出的抑制率与 LFIA+S 得出的 nAb 指数之间的关系。结果 研究数据分析来自认证的 ELISA 和 LFIA+S,结果表明这两种方法之间具有高度一致性(Pearson's r =0.864; ICC=0.90138)。结论 数据集表明,LFIA+S 价格低廉,与 cPass nAbs 检测试剂盒的结果有很强的相关性,具有潜在的临床应用价值,其独有的功能使非专业人员也能轻松使用。相信在不久的将来,拟议的平台可以得到推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信