Evaluating Nursing Students, performance with on Objective Structured Clinical Examination

A. Dehnoalian, Z. Zare, F. Tatari
{"title":"Evaluating Nursing Students, performance with on Objective Structured Clinical Examination","authors":"A. Dehnoalian, Z. Zare, F. Tatari","doi":"10.52547/RME.12.4.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"©2020 Guilan University of Medical Sciences ABSTACT Introduction: Considering the importance and necessity of conducting valid exam to evaluate the practical skills of nursing also advantages of the nursing process but no reviewing this process in clinical evaluation this study has been done to investigate the feedback and performance of nursing students in the evaluation of Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) based on the nursing process in 2019. Method: This study was conducted on 35 nursing students in their sixth semester which were selected by consensus method in Neyshabour university of medical sciences. Design of the OSCE stations was based on nursing processes. Data collection tools were a questionnaire of students’ feedback to the OSCE test and a researchermade checklist for reviewing performance. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, T-test and Pearson correlation through SPSS. Results: % 68.6 of students received the overall score of the OSCE test at a good level. The lowest mean score (7.39±3.41) was related to the nursing diagnosis station and the highest mean (19.21±0.97) was related to the vital signs station. The minimum overall score of the test was 10.70 and the maximum total score was 17.75. Most students (58.6%) find this test a useful practical experience, It is a good measuring clinical skills scale for 61.5%, 60% of students considered this a better diagnostic method to find out their weaknesses in clinical, 62.9% consider it an opportunity to learn more, 54.3% considered participating in this test as strengthening their selfconfidence. While this test was a stressful experience for 77% of students Conclusion: The findings of this study show the positive feedback of most students on this test and the importance of nursing processes in increasing the quality of nursing care. Therefore, it is recommended to use this method in evaluating the clinical skills of nursing students.","PeriodicalId":75518,"journal":{"name":"Annual Conference on Research in Medical Education. Conference on Research in Medical Education","volume":"13 1","pages":"29-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Conference on Research in Medical Education. Conference on Research in Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/RME.12.4.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

©2020 Guilan University of Medical Sciences ABSTACT Introduction: Considering the importance and necessity of conducting valid exam to evaluate the practical skills of nursing also advantages of the nursing process but no reviewing this process in clinical evaluation this study has been done to investigate the feedback and performance of nursing students in the evaluation of Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) based on the nursing process in 2019. Method: This study was conducted on 35 nursing students in their sixth semester which were selected by consensus method in Neyshabour university of medical sciences. Design of the OSCE stations was based on nursing processes. Data collection tools were a questionnaire of students’ feedback to the OSCE test and a researchermade checklist for reviewing performance. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, T-test and Pearson correlation through SPSS. Results: % 68.6 of students received the overall score of the OSCE test at a good level. The lowest mean score (7.39±3.41) was related to the nursing diagnosis station and the highest mean (19.21±0.97) was related to the vital signs station. The minimum overall score of the test was 10.70 and the maximum total score was 17.75. Most students (58.6%) find this test a useful practical experience, It is a good measuring clinical skills scale for 61.5%, 60% of students considered this a better diagnostic method to find out their weaknesses in clinical, 62.9% consider it an opportunity to learn more, 54.3% considered participating in this test as strengthening their selfconfidence. While this test was a stressful experience for 77% of students Conclusion: The findings of this study show the positive feedback of most students on this test and the importance of nursing processes in increasing the quality of nursing care. Therefore, it is recommended to use this method in evaluating the clinical skills of nursing students.
用客观结构化临床考核评价护生的表现
摘要简介:考虑到开展有效的考试来评估护理实践技能的重要性和必要性,以及护理过程在临床评估中未进行审查的优势,本研究调查了护生在2019年基于护理过程的客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)评估中的反馈和表现。方法:采用协商一致法抽取内沙布尔医科大学六学期护理专业35名学生为研究对象。欧安组织工作站的设计基于护理过程。数据收集工具是一份学生对欧安组织测试的反馈问卷和一份研究人员制作的检查表,用于审查学生的表现。数据分析采用描述性统计、t检验和Pearson相关分析。结果:68.6%的学生在欧安组织测试中获得了良好的总分。平均得分最低(7.39±3.41)分与护理诊断站有关,平均得分最高(19.21±0.97)分与生命体征站有关。考试总分最低10.70分,总分最高17.75分。大多数学生(58.6%)认为这个测试是一个有用的实践经验,61.5%的学生认为这是一个很好的测量临床技能量表,60%的学生认为这是一个更好的诊断方法,发现自己在临床中的弱点,62.9%的学生认为这是一个学习更多知识的机会,54.3%的学生认为参加这个测试是增强自信心。结论:本研究的结果表明,大多数学生对该测试的积极反馈,以及护理过程在提高护理质量方面的重要性。因此,建议采用该方法对护生临床技能进行评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信