Comparison of PID Controller Tuning Methods for Multi PMSM Angular Speed Synchronization

Kristian Ismail, T. D. Rachmildha, E. Rijanto, Y. Haroen, R. Ristiana
{"title":"Comparison of PID Controller Tuning Methods for Multi PMSM Angular Speed Synchronization","authors":"Kristian Ismail, T. D. Rachmildha, E. Rijanto, Y. Haroen, R. Ristiana","doi":"10.1109/ICEVT.2018.8628421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the comparison of the PID tuning method as multi PMSM system controller. The emphasis of this paper is to find a tuning method that has the best performance in speed synchronization, but other performances such as regulation, settling time and max overshoot are still considered. The PID tuning methods, Ziegler Nichols (ZN) and pole placement (PP) are simulated in two cases, namely by coupling constants (Kc) as variables and Kc included in the calculation of PID constants. The comparisons are done in MATLAB-Simulink® environment. The simulation results show that ZN with Kc included in the calculation has the best synchronization performance index (PI2), but has poor regulation performance index $(\\mathrm{PI}_{1})$. On the contrary, PP with Kc included in the calculation has a PI2 that is not good but has the best PI1. In PP with Kc as a variable, it has intermediate PI1and PI2","PeriodicalId":6659,"journal":{"name":"2018 5th International Conference on Electric Vehicular Technology (ICEVT)","volume":"8 1","pages":"95-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 5th International Conference on Electric Vehicular Technology (ICEVT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEVT.2018.8628421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper discusses the comparison of the PID tuning method as multi PMSM system controller. The emphasis of this paper is to find a tuning method that has the best performance in speed synchronization, but other performances such as regulation, settling time and max overshoot are still considered. The PID tuning methods, Ziegler Nichols (ZN) and pole placement (PP) are simulated in two cases, namely by coupling constants (Kc) as variables and Kc included in the calculation of PID constants. The comparisons are done in MATLAB-Simulink® environment. The simulation results show that ZN with Kc included in the calculation has the best synchronization performance index (PI2), but has poor regulation performance index $(\mathrm{PI}_{1})$. On the contrary, PP with Kc included in the calculation has a PI2 that is not good but has the best PI1. In PP with Kc as a variable, it has intermediate PI1and PI2
多路永磁同步电机角速度同步PID控制器整定方法比较
本文讨论了PID整定方法作为多同步电机系统控制器的比较。本文的重点是寻找一种在速度同步方面具有最佳性能的调谐方法,但仍要考虑调节、稳定时间和最大超调量等其他性能。对Ziegler Nichols (ZN)和极点放置(PP)两种PID整定方法进行了仿真,即以耦合常数(Kc)为变量和将Kc包含在PID常数的计算中。在MATLAB-Simulink®环境下进行比较。仿真结果表明,计算中包含Kc的ZN具有最佳的同步性能指标(PI2),但调节性能指标$(\ mathm {PI}_{1})$较差。相反,计算中包含Kc的PP的PI2不是很好,但PI1是最好的。在以Kc为变量的PP中,它具有中间pi1和PI2
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信