Who killed patient safety?

IF 0.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Carole Hemmelgarn, M. Hatlie, Susan E. Sheridan, Beth Daley Ullem
{"title":"Who killed patient safety?","authors":"Carole Hemmelgarn, M. Hatlie, Susan E. Sheridan, Beth Daley Ullem","doi":"10.1177/25160435221077778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The medical community’s commitment to patient safety has withered to over the past 10–15 years after the original call to action in 2000 with the release of the IOM report, To Err is Human. The tragedy of this decline in action around safety lies in the lives of the families like ours, who have lost loved ones, been harmed, and often permanently injured by medical error. What was once a motivating call to action, safety in hospitals and oversight by our government has been deprioritized, defunded, and devalued leaving patients like us to wonder: What happened to Patient Safety? When the To Err is Human (IOM) report was released in 2000 it estimated that 44,000–98,000 people lose their lives every year from medical errors in U.S. hospitals. The medical community was appalled by the estimate of preventable death and injury from medical errors to patients as identified in the seminal report. More recent research published by John James, in 2013, and Marty Makary, in 2016, suggested the original estimates underrepresented the amount of harm to patients caused by medical care which amounted to 400,000 or more lives a year. In To Err is Human, the IOM called for a public-private partnership to reduce medical errors by ninety percent in 10 years. And as a follow up in its 2001 report, Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century, the IOM positioned patient safety as fundamental to healthcare transformation. Twenty years later, other than infection control to anesthesia, the American hospitals have not progressed in systemically meeting patient safety goals, and the medical community seems to have lost its commitment to safety. Unsafe healthcare now vies with Covid-19 as the third largest cause of preventable death in the United States, and many of those who used to be champions for safety have moved on to other issues. Yet, we the patients and families, know safety is fundamental, not something that can ever fall off the list of priorities since it is a critical part of safe care every patient deserves. Earlier this year a peer review committee of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), which now houses the IOM, published a discouraging report on the current strategies to improve patient safety finding:","PeriodicalId":73888,"journal":{"name":"Journal of patient safety and risk management","volume":"12 1","pages":"56 - 58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of patient safety and risk management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25160435221077778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The medical community’s commitment to patient safety has withered to over the past 10–15 years after the original call to action in 2000 with the release of the IOM report, To Err is Human. The tragedy of this decline in action around safety lies in the lives of the families like ours, who have lost loved ones, been harmed, and often permanently injured by medical error. What was once a motivating call to action, safety in hospitals and oversight by our government has been deprioritized, defunded, and devalued leaving patients like us to wonder: What happened to Patient Safety? When the To Err is Human (IOM) report was released in 2000 it estimated that 44,000–98,000 people lose their lives every year from medical errors in U.S. hospitals. The medical community was appalled by the estimate of preventable death and injury from medical errors to patients as identified in the seminal report. More recent research published by John James, in 2013, and Marty Makary, in 2016, suggested the original estimates underrepresented the amount of harm to patients caused by medical care which amounted to 400,000 or more lives a year. In To Err is Human, the IOM called for a public-private partnership to reduce medical errors by ninety percent in 10 years. And as a follow up in its 2001 report, Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century, the IOM positioned patient safety as fundamental to healthcare transformation. Twenty years later, other than infection control to anesthesia, the American hospitals have not progressed in systemically meeting patient safety goals, and the medical community seems to have lost its commitment to safety. Unsafe healthcare now vies with Covid-19 as the third largest cause of preventable death in the United States, and many of those who used to be champions for safety have moved on to other issues. Yet, we the patients and families, know safety is fundamental, not something that can ever fall off the list of priorities since it is a critical part of safe care every patient deserves. Earlier this year a peer review committee of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), which now houses the IOM, published a discouraging report on the current strategies to improve patient safety finding:
谁扼杀了病人的安全?
在2000年IOM报告《人孰无过》发布后,医学界对患者安全的承诺在过去的10-15年里已经萎缩。安全行动减少的悲剧在于像我们这样的家庭的生命,他们失去了亲人,受到伤害,而且往往因医疗失误而永久受伤。医院的安全和政府的监督曾经是一个激励人心的行动呼吁,但现在却被剥夺了优先权,撤资和贬值,让像我们这样的病人想知道:病人的安全发生了什么?2000年发布的《人孰无过》报告估计,美国医院每年有4.4万至9.8万人死于医疗事故。医学界对报告中确定的医疗差错对患者造成的可预防的死亡和伤害的估计感到震惊。约翰·詹姆斯(John James)和马蒂·马卡里(Marty Makary)在2013年和2016年发表的最新研究表明,最初的估计低估了医疗护理对患者造成的伤害,每年有40万人或更多的人因此丧生。在《人无常情》一书中,国际移民组织呼吁建立公私合作伙伴关系,在10年内将医疗差错减少90%。在2001年的报告《跨越质量鸿沟:21世纪的新医疗体系》中,IOM将患者安全定位为医疗改革的基础。二十年后,除了感染控制到麻醉,美国医院在系统地满足患者安全目标方面没有取得进展,医学界似乎已经失去了对安全的承诺。不安全的医疗保健现在与Covid-19一起成为美国可预防死亡的第三大原因,许多曾经是安全捍卫者的人已经转向了其他问题。然而,我们患者和家属知道,安全是最基本的,不能从优先事项列表中删除,因为它是每个患者应该得到的安全护理的关键部分。今年早些时候,美国国家科学院(NAS)的同行评议委员会(现在是IOM的所在地)发表了一份令人沮丧的报告,内容是关于改善患者安全的当前策略:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信