Validity Testing of Developed General English Modul for University Students at Universitas PGRI Silampari

Linguistic English Education and Art LEEA Journal Pub Date : 2023-06-13 DOI:10.31539/leea.v6i2.5067

Yulfi Yulfi, Ayu Oktaviani, Rahmat Rizki

{"title":"Validity Testing of Developed General English Modul for University Students at Universitas PGRI Silampari","authors":"Yulfi Yulfi, Ayu Oktaviani, Rahmat Rizki","doi":"10.31539/leea.v6i2.5067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aimed to find out the expert validity of developed modul “General English Modul” at PGRI Silampari University (UNPARI). The method used in this research was descriptive qualitative. There were three experts in validating the modul. They were expert of content, expert of instructional design and expert of media. The instrument used in collecting data was questionnaire. In analyzing data, the researchers read all comments given by experts for each espertise (data condensation). After that, the coment was interpreted by the researchers and rechecked to the experts (data display). Finally, the developed modul was revised based on the suggestion. For the results showed that for content validity, the expert coclude that the modul was in highly validity, but she suggested some revision. In validating instructional design, the expert also received the modul but with some revisions. And the last, there were some aspect of media such as the brightness of the cover, pictures and color must be revised. Finally, in conclusion, the modul of General English subject at UNPARI was accepted with some revision. \nKeywords: General English Modul, Validity","PeriodicalId":33052,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic English Education and Art LEEA Journal","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic English Education and Art LEEA Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31539/leea.v6i2.5067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aimed to find out the expert validity of developed modul “General English Modul” at PGRI Silampari University (UNPARI). The method used in this research was descriptive qualitative. There were three experts in validating the modul. They were expert of content, expert of instructional design and expert of media. The instrument used in collecting data was questionnaire. In analyzing data, the researchers read all comments given by experts for each espertise (data condensation). After that, the coment was interpreted by the researchers and rechecked to the experts (data display). Finally, the developed modul was revised based on the suggestion. For the results showed that for content validity, the expert coclude that the modul was in highly validity, but she suggested some revision. In validating instructional design, the expert also received the modul but with some revisions. And the last, there were some aspect of media such as the brightness of the cover, pictures and color must be revised. Finally, in conclusion, the modul of General English subject at UNPARI was accepted with some revision. Keywords: General English Modul, Validity

查看原文本刊更多论文

开发的大学生通用英语模块的效度测试

本研究旨在了解PGRI Silampari大学(UNPARI)开发的“通用英语模块”的专家有效性。本研究采用描述性定性方法。有三位专家在验证这个模块。他们是内容专家、教学设计专家和媒介专家。收集资料的工具为问卷调查。在分析数据时，研究人员阅读了专家对每个专业给出的所有评论(数据浓缩)。之后，由研究人员对评论进行解读，并向专家进行复核(数据显示)。最后，根据建议对开发的模块进行了修改。结果显示，对于内容效度，专家认为该模块是高效度的，但她建议进行一些修改。在验证教学设计时，专家也收到了该模块，但进行了一些修改。最后，还有媒体的一些方面，如封面的亮度，图片和颜色必须修改。最后，综上所述，UNPARI的普通英语科目模块经过一些修改后被接受。关键词:通用英语模块;有效性

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Linguistic English Education and Art LEEA Journal

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

12 weeks