Physician Satisfaction With Clinical Pharmacist Services in an Obstetrics and Gynecology Teaching Clinic

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Alicia B. Forinash, Danielle Chamness, Abigail M. Yancey, K. Mathews, Collin Miller, Judy Thompson, T. Myles
{"title":"Physician Satisfaction With Clinical Pharmacist Services in an Obstetrics and Gynecology Teaching Clinic","authors":"Alicia B. Forinash, Danielle Chamness, Abigail M. Yancey, K. Mathews, Collin Miller, Judy Thompson, T. Myles","doi":"10.1177/8755122516658767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate physician satisfaction with clinical pharmacy services in an obstetrics teaching clinic. Study Design: A 35-question survey was created to evaluate demographics and provider satisfaction with clinical pharmacy services using 5-point Likert scale and open response questions. Surveys were administered to all clinic attendings, maternal fetal medicine fellows, and OB/Gyn residents in June 2014 via Survey Monkey. Results: Thirty-one physicians (83.8%) completed the survey. The first set of questions utilized a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from “poor” (1) to “excellent” (5) and evaluated respondents’ impressions of the clinical pharmacists’ clinical knowledge and professional behavior. The median score was 5 (“excellent”) on all items in the survey, and many demonstrated an average response of 4.81 to 4.9 or higher, demonstrating that almost all respondents chose “excellent.” The next set of questions assessed the clinical pharmacist’s role with the clinic’s multidisciplinary team and asked respondents to answer questions based on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from “strongly disagree” (1) to “strongly agree” (5). The majority of responses to questions in this section were between 4.19 and 4.84. Reasons for referring patients to the clinical pharmacist were smoking cessation, asthma management, psych medication use/issues, adherence/polypharmacy, medication reconciliation, counseling on medication safety in pregnancy, insulin/heparin administration, and substance abuse. Conclusions: Overall, the survey identified a positive response and high level of physician satisfaction with clinical pharmacy services. Clinical pharmacy has the capacity to enhance pregnancy care and should be more routinely integrated into the prenatal care team.","PeriodicalId":16796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":"19 1","pages":"191 - 195"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/8755122516658767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate physician satisfaction with clinical pharmacy services in an obstetrics teaching clinic. Study Design: A 35-question survey was created to evaluate demographics and provider satisfaction with clinical pharmacy services using 5-point Likert scale and open response questions. Surveys were administered to all clinic attendings, maternal fetal medicine fellows, and OB/Gyn residents in June 2014 via Survey Monkey. Results: Thirty-one physicians (83.8%) completed the survey. The first set of questions utilized a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from “poor” (1) to “excellent” (5) and evaluated respondents’ impressions of the clinical pharmacists’ clinical knowledge and professional behavior. The median score was 5 (“excellent”) on all items in the survey, and many demonstrated an average response of 4.81 to 4.9 or higher, demonstrating that almost all respondents chose “excellent.” The next set of questions assessed the clinical pharmacist’s role with the clinic’s multidisciplinary team and asked respondents to answer questions based on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from “strongly disagree” (1) to “strongly agree” (5). The majority of responses to questions in this section were between 4.19 and 4.84. Reasons for referring patients to the clinical pharmacist were smoking cessation, asthma management, psych medication use/issues, adherence/polypharmacy, medication reconciliation, counseling on medication safety in pregnancy, insulin/heparin administration, and substance abuse. Conclusions: Overall, the survey identified a positive response and high level of physician satisfaction with clinical pharmacy services. Clinical pharmacy has the capacity to enhance pregnancy care and should be more routinely integrated into the prenatal care team.
某妇产科教学门诊医师对临床药师服务的满意度
目的:评价妇产科教学门诊医师对临床药学服务的满意度。研究设计:采用5点李克特量表和开放式回答问题,设计了一项包含35个问题的调查,以评估人口统计学特征和提供者对临床药学服务的满意度。2014年6月,通过Survey Monkey对所有门诊主治医师、母胎医学研究员和妇产科住院医师进行调查。结果:完成调查的医师31名,占83.8%。第一组问题采用李克特5分量表,从“差”(1)到“优”(5),评估被调查者对临床药师临床知识和专业行为的印象。所有调查项目的中位数得分为5分(“优秀”),许多人的平均回答为4.81至4.9或更高,表明几乎所有受访者都选择了“优秀”。下一组问题评估临床药剂师在临床多学科团队中的作用,并要求受访者根据5点李克特量表回答从“非常不同意”(1)到“非常同意”(5)的问题。这部分问题的大多数回答在4.19到4.84之间。将患者转介给临床药师的原因包括戒烟、哮喘管理、精神药物使用/问题、依从性/多重用药、药物和解、妊娠期用药安全咨询、胰岛素/肝素给药和药物滥用。结论:总体而言,调查确定了积极的反应和高水平的医生对临床药学服务的满意度。临床药学有能力加强妊娠护理,应更常规地纳入产前护理团队。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Technology
Journal of Pharmacy Technology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: For both pharmacists and technicians, jPT provides valuable information for those interested in the entire body of pharmacy practice. jPT covers new drugs, products, and equipment; therapeutic trends; organizational, legal, and educational activities; drug distribution and administration; and includes continuing education articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信