Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimation Based on Cystatin C Formulas among Neonates

N. Khalesi, Farnoosh Seirafianpour, R. Hoseini, H. Otukesh, N. Rahimzadeh, S. Nakhaie, G. Gohardehi, P. Mohaghegh
{"title":"Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimation Based on Cystatin C Formulas among Neonates","authors":"N. Khalesi, Farnoosh Seirafianpour, R. Hoseini, H. Otukesh, N. Rahimzadeh, S. Nakhaie, G. Gohardehi, P. Mohaghegh","doi":"10.22038/IJN.2021.43684.1727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is the best indicator to assess renal function; however, it is difficult to perform it, especially in neonates. Serum creatinine is the most commonly used marker of GFR; nevertheless, it has some limitations since it can be affected by factors other than renal function. Cystatin C, another endogenous marker used to estimate GFR, is not affected by non-renal factors. The results of some studies suggest that serum cystatin C levels are more accurate tests of kidney function than serum creatinine levels. This study aimed to estimate GFR with cystatin C-based formulas among neonates and determine the correlations between these methods and the Schwartz formula. Methods: The population of this research consisted of 99 neonates whose serum creatinine and cystatin C levels were measured concurrently. Moreover, the glomerular filtration rate was estimated using the Schwartz formula and 14 cystatin C-based formulas separately. Results: Based on the findings, all GFR values based on cystatin C formulas correlated significantly with each other (p 0.05). The only cystatin C formula that yielded values correlating with the Schwartz formula was CysCrEq, which used serum cystatin C and creatinine concomitantly. Conclusion: It can be concluded that since all GFR values based on cystatin C correlated significantly and cystatin Cwasindependent of non-renal factors, cystatin C reflected the real GFR more accurately than serum creatinine. Nonetheless, further studies with gold standard techniques are required to verify the usefulness of cystatin C-based formulas.","PeriodicalId":14584,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Neonatology IJN","volume":"14 1","pages":"21-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Neonatology IJN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/IJN.2021.43684.1727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is the best indicator to assess renal function; however, it is difficult to perform it, especially in neonates. Serum creatinine is the most commonly used marker of GFR; nevertheless, it has some limitations since it can be affected by factors other than renal function. Cystatin C, another endogenous marker used to estimate GFR, is not affected by non-renal factors. The results of some studies suggest that serum cystatin C levels are more accurate tests of kidney function than serum creatinine levels. This study aimed to estimate GFR with cystatin C-based formulas among neonates and determine the correlations between these methods and the Schwartz formula. Methods: The population of this research consisted of 99 neonates whose serum creatinine and cystatin C levels were measured concurrently. Moreover, the glomerular filtration rate was estimated using the Schwartz formula and 14 cystatin C-based formulas separately. Results: Based on the findings, all GFR values based on cystatin C formulas correlated significantly with each other (p 0.05). The only cystatin C formula that yielded values correlating with the Schwartz formula was CysCrEq, which used serum cystatin C and creatinine concomitantly. Conclusion: It can be concluded that since all GFR values based on cystatin C correlated significantly and cystatin Cwasindependent of non-renal factors, cystatin C reflected the real GFR more accurately than serum creatinine. Nonetheless, further studies with gold standard techniques are required to verify the usefulness of cystatin C-based formulas.
基于胱抑素C配方估算新生儿肾小球滤过率
背景:肾小球滤过率(Glomerular filtration rate, GFR)是评估肾功能的最佳指标;然而,它很难执行,特别是在新生儿中。血清肌酐是GFR最常用的标志物;然而,它也有一定的局限性,因为它可以受到肾功能以外的因素的影响。胱抑素C是另一种用于估计GFR的内源性标志物,不受非肾因素的影响。一些研究结果表明,血清胱抑素C水平比血清肌酐水平更准确地检测肾功能。本研究旨在评估基于胱抑素c配方的新生儿GFR,并确定这些方法与Schwartz配方之间的相关性。方法:以99例新生儿为研究对象,同时测定血清肌酐和胱抑素C水平。此外,分别使用Schwartz公式和基于胱抑素c的14种公式估算肾小球滤过率。结果:基于胱抑素C公式的所有GFR值具有显著相关性(p < 0.05)。唯一产生与Schwartz公式相关值的胱抑素C公式是cycreq,它同时使用血清胱抑素C和肌酐。结论:基于胱抑素C的GFR各值相关性显著,且胱抑素C与非肾因素无关,因此胱抑素C比血清肌酐更能准确反映真实GFR。尽管如此,还需要金标准技术的进一步研究来验证基于胱抑素c的配方的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信