Students' Feedback: An Imperative to Enhance Quality of Engineering Education

C. S. Nair
{"title":"Students' Feedback: An Imperative to Enhance Quality of Engineering Education","authors":"C. S. Nair","doi":"10.4018/ijqaete.2011010105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"aBstract The collection of stakeholder feedback has been gradually increasing in universities around the world. The most common practice is the use of surveys to evaluate student perceptions of their units (subjects), courses, programs and overall learning experience. The elements of a good quality system involve not only collecting evaluation information but making improvements based on it. This article gives an overview of the importance of student evaluations, the research supporting such feedback and a case study that illustrates how evaluation and improvement enhance the learning and teaching environment. Bennett and Nair (2010) list the major purposes of such feedback as:(a) Diagnostic feedback that aids in the devel-opment and improvement of teaching and learning environments;(b) Research data useful for guiding the redesign of units (subjects), courses, curriculum;(c) Information on teaching effectiveness that may be used in administrative decision making; and,(d) Measures useful for judging the quality of units and courses which may be tied to funding.The first two purposes describe the gener-ally recognised rationale for student surveys and course evaluations (Nair & Fisher, 2001).","PeriodicalId":13684,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Qual. Assur. Eng. Technol. Educ.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Qual. Assur. Eng. Technol. Educ.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijqaete.2011010105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

aBstract The collection of stakeholder feedback has been gradually increasing in universities around the world. The most common practice is the use of surveys to evaluate student perceptions of their units (subjects), courses, programs and overall learning experience. The elements of a good quality system involve not only collecting evaluation information but making improvements based on it. This article gives an overview of the importance of student evaluations, the research supporting such feedback and a case study that illustrates how evaluation and improvement enhance the learning and teaching environment. Bennett and Nair (2010) list the major purposes of such feedback as:(a) Diagnostic feedback that aids in the devel-opment and improvement of teaching and learning environments;(b) Research data useful for guiding the redesign of units (subjects), courses, curriculum;(c) Information on teaching effectiveness that may be used in administrative decision making; and,(d) Measures useful for judging the quality of units and courses which may be tied to funding.The first two purposes describe the gener-ally recognised rationale for student surveys and course evaluations (Nair & Fisher, 2001).
学生反馈:提高工程教育质量的必要条件
在世界各地的大学中,利益相关者反馈的收集正在逐渐增加。最常见的做法是使用调查来评估学生对其单元(科目)、课程、项目和整体学习经验的看法。良好质量体系的要素不仅包括收集评价信息,还包括在此基础上进行改进。本文概述了学生评价的重要性,支持这种反馈的研究,并通过一个案例来说明评价和改进如何改善学习和教学环境。Bennett和Nair(2010)列出了这些反馈的主要目的:(a)有助于发展和改进教学环境的诊断性反馈;(b)有助于指导单元(科目)、课程、课程的重新设计的研究数据;(c)可用于行政决策的教学有效性信息;(d)对判断可能与经费有关的单位和课程的质素有用的措施。前两个目的描述了普遍认可的学生调查和课程评估的基本原理(Nair & Fisher, 2001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信