{"title":"Unken Reflex in the California Red-legged Frog Rana draytonii in Western North America","authors":"J. Alvarez, Jennifer L. Haire","doi":"10.3160/0038-3872-120.3.132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interspecific interactions of the California red-legged frog have been much studied in recent decades (Alvarez et al. 2003; Cook and Jennings 2007; Bishop et al. 2014). Nevertheless, behaviors of R. draytonii specifically related to predator avoidance have either been accepted as putative or remain unpublished. Rana draytonii engages in two common defensive behaviors that are typical of most anurans when approached by potential predators: first, immobility, by which the frog eludes notice, and second, a fast leap into surrounding aquatic or upland habitat (Stebbins and Cohen 1995; pers obs.). Less commonly reported, but observed by the senior author, is a third defensive behavior, an alarm call, which is given off by many anurans (Stebbins and Cohen 1995; Duellman and Trueb 1994). Here we report R. draytonii engaged in a likely fourth defensive behavior, the “unken reflex”. While collecting data on the relative abundance of California red-legged frog larvae in the upper Kellogg Creek watershed (aka: Los Vaqueros Watershed) in eastern Contra Costa County, we were dip-netting for the species from numerous cattle stock ponds known to support the species. At the interpretive center pond (location: 37.842275° N, 121.724343° W), we captured an adult male R. draytonii (snout-urostyle length ∼6.5 cm). As we removed it from the net for release, the frog abruptly assumed what has been reported as the unken reflex (see: Duellman and Trueb 1994; Fig. 1), a posture characterized by an arched back and front limbs extended upward. Among anurans, this posture is thought to be used defensively by the yellow-bellied toad (Bombina variegata) and the white-lipped bright-eyed treefrog (Boophis albilabris) and has also been more recently reported for the Florida gopher frog (Lithobates capito aesopus) (Duellman and Trueb 1994; Andreone 2003; Means 2004). The male frog we observed held the position for 45 to 60 sec before being released. As observed in B. variegata, B. albilabris, and L. c. aesopus, the frog was relatively rigid, its front limbs angled upward toward the eyes and the “palms” pointed upward (Fig. 1). Duellman and Trueb (1994) contend that this behavior allows the brightly colored venter to be exhibited to a potential predator, suggesting an aposematic purpose. Means (2004), however, strongly suggested that this behavior in L. c. aesopus is related to protection of the eyes from intraspecific interactions. It may be a combination of these postulated purposes that caused R. draytonii to use this behavior as a defensive mechanism, however, further research is required to fully understand this behavior. Our observation suggests that the unken reflex represents a fourth defensive behavior exhibited by this threatened species.","PeriodicalId":90803,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin (Southern California Academy of Sciences)","volume":"311 1","pages":"132 - 134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin (Southern California Academy of Sciences)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3160/0038-3872-120.3.132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Interspecific interactions of the California red-legged frog have been much studied in recent decades (Alvarez et al. 2003; Cook and Jennings 2007; Bishop et al. 2014). Nevertheless, behaviors of R. draytonii specifically related to predator avoidance have either been accepted as putative or remain unpublished. Rana draytonii engages in two common defensive behaviors that are typical of most anurans when approached by potential predators: first, immobility, by which the frog eludes notice, and second, a fast leap into surrounding aquatic or upland habitat (Stebbins and Cohen 1995; pers obs.). Less commonly reported, but observed by the senior author, is a third defensive behavior, an alarm call, which is given off by many anurans (Stebbins and Cohen 1995; Duellman and Trueb 1994). Here we report R. draytonii engaged in a likely fourth defensive behavior, the “unken reflex”. While collecting data on the relative abundance of California red-legged frog larvae in the upper Kellogg Creek watershed (aka: Los Vaqueros Watershed) in eastern Contra Costa County, we were dip-netting for the species from numerous cattle stock ponds known to support the species. At the interpretive center pond (location: 37.842275° N, 121.724343° W), we captured an adult male R. draytonii (snout-urostyle length ∼6.5 cm). As we removed it from the net for release, the frog abruptly assumed what has been reported as the unken reflex (see: Duellman and Trueb 1994; Fig. 1), a posture characterized by an arched back and front limbs extended upward. Among anurans, this posture is thought to be used defensively by the yellow-bellied toad (Bombina variegata) and the white-lipped bright-eyed treefrog (Boophis albilabris) and has also been more recently reported for the Florida gopher frog (Lithobates capito aesopus) (Duellman and Trueb 1994; Andreone 2003; Means 2004). The male frog we observed held the position for 45 to 60 sec before being released. As observed in B. variegata, B. albilabris, and L. c. aesopus, the frog was relatively rigid, its front limbs angled upward toward the eyes and the “palms” pointed upward (Fig. 1). Duellman and Trueb (1994) contend that this behavior allows the brightly colored venter to be exhibited to a potential predator, suggesting an aposematic purpose. Means (2004), however, strongly suggested that this behavior in L. c. aesopus is related to protection of the eyes from intraspecific interactions. It may be a combination of these postulated purposes that caused R. draytonii to use this behavior as a defensive mechanism, however, further research is required to fully understand this behavior. Our observation suggests that the unken reflex represents a fourth defensive behavior exhibited by this threatened species.
近几十年来,人们对加利福尼亚红腿蛙的种间相互作用进行了大量研究(Alvarez et al. 2003;Cook and Jennings 2007;Bishop et al. 2014)。然而,draytonii的特定行为与捕食者回避有关,要么被认为是假设的,要么尚未发表。当被潜在的捕食者接近时,蛙蛙会有两种常见的防御行为,这是大多数无脊椎动物的典型行为:第一,静止不动,这样青蛙就不会被注意到;第二,快速跳入周围的水生或高地栖息地(Stebbins和Cohen 1995;珀耳斯观察)。很少有人报道,但资深作者观察到了第三种防御行为,一种警报呼叫,这是许多anurans发出的(Stebbins和Cohen 1995;Duellman and Trueb 1994)。在这里,我们报告R. draytonii参与了可能的第四种防御行为,即“不屈服反射”。在康特拉科斯塔县东部的上凯洛格溪流域(又名:洛斯瓦奎罗斯流域)收集加州红腿蛙幼虫相对丰度的数据时,我们从已知支持该物种的众多牛池中对该物种进行了蘸网。在解说中心池塘(位置:37.842275°N, 121.724343°W),我们捕获了一只成年雄性draytoni r.s(长约6.5 cm)。当我们把它从网中拿出来准备释放时,青蛙突然表现出了被报道为未察觉的反射(见:Duellman and Trueb 1994;图1),一种背部弓起,前肢向上伸展的姿势。在无尾目动物中,这种姿势被认为是黄腹蟾蜍(bomina variegata)和白唇亮眼树蛙(Boophis albilabris)的防御姿势,最近也有报道称佛罗里达地鼠蛙(Lithobates capito aesopus) (Duellman and Trueb 1994;Andreone 2003;意味着2004)。我们观察到的雄性青蛙在被释放之前保持这个姿势45到60秒。正如在B. variegata, B. albilabris和L. c. aesopus中观察到的那样,这种青蛙相对来说是僵硬的,它的前肢向上朝向眼睛,“手掌”向上指向(图1)。Duellman和Trueb(1994)认为,这种行为可以让颜色鲜艳的腹部向潜在的捕食者展示,这表明了一种警告的目的。然而,Means(2004)强烈地表明,这种行为在L. c. aesopus中与保护眼睛免受种内相互作用有关。这可能是这些假设目的的结合,导致r.d raytonii使用这种行为作为一种防御机制,然而,需要进一步的研究来充分理解这种行为。我们的观察表明,不屈服反射代表了这个受威胁物种所表现出的第四种防御行为。