The Development of Two-tier Multiple Choice Assessment Instrument to Measure Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) of The Students on Excretion System Material

Y. Yunita, N. R. Dewi
{"title":"The Development of Two-tier Multiple Choice Assessment Instrument to Measure Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) of The Students on Excretion System Material","authors":"Y. Yunita, N. R. Dewi","doi":"10.15294/usej.v9i1.36472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Science learning based on 2013 curriculum requires the students to be able at analyzing, evaluating, and creating to achieve higher order thinking skills (HOTS). The results of observation at SMP N 2 Sukolilo showed that there was no task or question which was specifically used to measure HOTS of the students. The aim of this study is to analyze the characteristics of two-tier multiple choice assessment instrument and HOTS ability of the students. This research was conducted by using Research and Development (R&D) method. Samples were taken by random sampling technique from the population of class IX students of SMP N 2 Sukolilo in the academic year 2019/2020, then class IX C was selected for small-scale trial, class IX B was selected for large-scale trial, and class IX A was selected for trial use. Data was taken by some methods such as test, questionnaire, and documentation. The characteristics of two-tier multiple choice assessment instrument was analyzed by expert judgment and empirical testing. Whereas, HOTS level of the students was analyzed using the HOTS Category Scale. The results of the analysis of the characteristics of two-tier multiple choice assessment instrument indicated that the developed instrument had fulfilled the requirement as a good instrument, namely (1) valid, with the result of expert validation as many as 79% (feasible) and the results of the item analysis was 0.49 (sufficient ); (2) reliable, with the reliability result was 0.40 (reliable); (3) relevant, representative, practical, and specific as indicated by the results of the teacher's questionnaire responses with the percentage 75% (good); (4) discriminatory power, with the average of analysis result was 0.36 (good); and (5) proportional / difficulty level, with the analysis result of most questions in the moderate category. Furthermore, the analysis results of HOTS level of the students showed that the students on the large-scale trial were mostly in the moderate category (67%) and some of them in a small portion were in the low category (33%). While, HOTS level of the students on the trial use showed that most of the students were in the moderate category (50%), some of them were in the low category (30%), and a small portion of them were in the high category (20%). The conclusion of this study is the developed two-tier multiple choice assessment instrument has been feasible, because it has met the requirements as a good instrument and can be used to measure HOTS of the students.","PeriodicalId":30735,"journal":{"name":"USEJ Unnes Science Education Journal","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"USEJ Unnes Science Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/usej.v9i1.36472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Science learning based on 2013 curriculum requires the students to be able at analyzing, evaluating, and creating to achieve higher order thinking skills (HOTS). The results of observation at SMP N 2 Sukolilo showed that there was no task or question which was specifically used to measure HOTS of the students. The aim of this study is to analyze the characteristics of two-tier multiple choice assessment instrument and HOTS ability of the students. This research was conducted by using Research and Development (R&D) method. Samples were taken by random sampling technique from the population of class IX students of SMP N 2 Sukolilo in the academic year 2019/2020, then class IX C was selected for small-scale trial, class IX B was selected for large-scale trial, and class IX A was selected for trial use. Data was taken by some methods such as test, questionnaire, and documentation. The characteristics of two-tier multiple choice assessment instrument was analyzed by expert judgment and empirical testing. Whereas, HOTS level of the students was analyzed using the HOTS Category Scale. The results of the analysis of the characteristics of two-tier multiple choice assessment instrument indicated that the developed instrument had fulfilled the requirement as a good instrument, namely (1) valid, with the result of expert validation as many as 79% (feasible) and the results of the item analysis was 0.49 (sufficient ); (2) reliable, with the reliability result was 0.40 (reliable); (3) relevant, representative, practical, and specific as indicated by the results of the teacher's questionnaire responses with the percentage 75% (good); (4) discriminatory power, with the average of analysis result was 0.36 (good); and (5) proportional / difficulty level, with the analysis result of most questions in the moderate category. Furthermore, the analysis results of HOTS level of the students showed that the students on the large-scale trial were mostly in the moderate category (67%) and some of them in a small portion were in the low category (33%). While, HOTS level of the students on the trial use showed that most of the students were in the moderate category (50%), some of them were in the low category (30%), and a small portion of them were in the high category (20%). The conclusion of this study is the developed two-tier multiple choice assessment instrument has been feasible, because it has met the requirements as a good instrument and can be used to measure HOTS of the students.
利用排泄系统材料测试学生高阶思维能力的两层选择评估工具的开发
基于2013年课程的科学学习要求学生具备分析、评价和创造的能力,以达到更高层次的思维技能(HOTS)。在苏科利洛SMP N 2的观察结果表明,没有专门用于测量学生HOTS的任务或问题。本研究的目的是分析两层选择题评估工具的特点和学生的HOTS能力。本研究采用研究与开发(R&D)方法进行。采用随机抽样的方法,从2019/2020学年苏科利洛中学九班学生中抽取样本,然后选择IX C班进行小规模试验,选择IX B班进行大规模试验,选择IX A班进行试验。采用测试、问卷调查、文献记录等方法获取数据。采用专家判断和实证检验相结合的方法,分析了双层选择题评价工具的特点。而学生的HOTS水平则采用HOTS类别量表进行分析。对二级选择题评价量表的特征分析结果表明,所研制的二级选择题评价量表达到了良好评价量表的要求,即:(1)有效,专家验证率高达79%(可行),项目分析结果为0.49(充分);(2)可靠,信度结果为0.40(可靠);(3)教师问卷回答结果显示的相关性、代表性、实用性和针对性,百分比为75%(好);(4)判别力,分析结果平均值为0.36(良好);(5)比例/难度等级,大多数问题的分析结果在中等类别。此外,学生的HOTS水平分析结果显示,大规模试验的学生大多处于中等类别(67%),少部分学生处于低类别(33%)。而试用学生的HOTS水平显示,大部分学生处于中等类别(50%),部分学生处于低类别(30%),小部分学生处于高类别(20%)。本研究的结论是,开发的双层选择题评估工具是可行的,因为它已经满足了作为一个很好的工具的要求,可以用来衡量学生的HOTS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信