The methodological analysis of sediment phosphate research on the coast of Indonesia: a short review

A. Adnan, M. Irham, M. Rusdi, I. Setiawan, S. A. Azis
{"title":"The methodological analysis of sediment phosphate research on the coast of Indonesia: a short review","authors":"A. Adnan, M. Irham, M. Rusdi, I. Setiawan, S. A. Azis","doi":"10.13170/depik.11.1.21604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer method (AAS) and UV-Vis Spectrophotometer method are often used in analyzing elements and compounds in water and sediment. The comparative method of AAS and UV-Vis analysis in sediments in this article is studied to see the accuracy of the equipment used and the efficiency of the resulting analysis. Analysis of the comparative method of phosphate analysis in coastal sediments shows differences and similarities in the use of the two instruments used even though the methods used based on the results of the review do not show significant differences. Methodologically, various types of methods can be carried out to analyze coastal sediment phosphates. The UV-Vis spectrophotometric method is generally more widely used than the AAS method. For a small number of sediment samples, the ASS method is more efficient than the UV-Vis method; however, UV-Vis is more accurate for dissolved samples because less phosphate is released when identified than the AAS method. Based on this, the AAS method is more effective in analyzing phosphate sediments in coastal areas than the UV-Vis method, but the UV-Vis method for wet samples is more accurate.Keywords:Coastal SedimentPhosphateSpectrophotometerUV-VisAAS","PeriodicalId":30450,"journal":{"name":"Depik Jurnal","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Depik Jurnal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13170/depik.11.1.21604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer method (AAS) and UV-Vis Spectrophotometer method are often used in analyzing elements and compounds in water and sediment. The comparative method of AAS and UV-Vis analysis in sediments in this article is studied to see the accuracy of the equipment used and the efficiency of the resulting analysis. Analysis of the comparative method of phosphate analysis in coastal sediments shows differences and similarities in the use of the two instruments used even though the methods used based on the results of the review do not show significant differences. Methodologically, various types of methods can be carried out to analyze coastal sediment phosphates. The UV-Vis spectrophotometric method is generally more widely used than the AAS method. For a small number of sediment samples, the ASS method is more efficient than the UV-Vis method; however, UV-Vis is more accurate for dissolved samples because less phosphate is released when identified than the AAS method. Based on this, the AAS method is more effective in analyzing phosphate sediments in coastal areas than the UV-Vis method, but the UV-Vis method for wet samples is more accurate.Keywords:Coastal SedimentPhosphateSpectrophotometerUV-VisAAS
印度尼西亚海岸沉积物磷酸盐研究的方法学分析:简要回顾
原子吸收分光光度计法(AAS)和紫外可见分光光度计法是分析水和沉积物中元素和化合物的常用方法。本文研究了原子吸收光谱法和紫外可见光谱法在沉积物中的对比分析方法,以了解所使用设备的准确性和分析结果的效率。对沿海沉积物中磷酸盐分析的比较方法的分析显示,尽管根据审查结果所使用的方法没有显示出显着差异,但所使用的两种仪器在使用方面存在差异和相似之处。在方法上,可以采用各种方法来分析沿海沉积物磷酸盐。紫外可见分光光度法通常比原子吸收光谱法应用更广泛。对于少量沉积物样品,ASS法比UV-Vis法效率更高;然而,UV-Vis对溶解样品更准确,因为在鉴定时释放的磷酸盐比原子吸收法少。基于此,原子吸收光谱法比紫外-可见法更有效地分析沿海地区的磷酸盐沉积物,但紫外-可见法对湿样更准确。关键词:沿海SedimentPhosphateSpectrophotometerUV-VisAAS
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信