The Edge of the “Stone Raft”. From euro-enthusiasm to moderate scepticism in Portuguese History textbooks (2000-2020)

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Sérgio Neto, Clara Serrano
{"title":"The Edge of the “Stone Raft”. From euro-enthusiasm to moderate scepticism in Portuguese History textbooks (2000-2020)","authors":"Sérgio Neto, Clara Serrano","doi":"10.5565/rev/rubrica.270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to study how issues related to the European Economic Community/European Union (EEC/EU) are presented in Portuguese 9th-grade History textbooks. The methodological approach is mainly qualitative, based on a content analysis of ten textbooks, but some quantitative data was also considered in order to determine the importance given to the EEC/EU construction process and Portugal’s integration into it. It can be concluded that although the history textbooks contain some information about the political construction process, the institutions of the EEC/EU and its economic and social policies, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of Portugal’s integration into the EU, the information is mainly presented from a linear perspective and does not prioritise the development of students’ critical thinking. This study also points to a predominance of content related to national citizenship, the concept of European citizenship being presented in a brief and normative way. Our intention, in the near future, is to expand on this study, with a comparative study between Portugal and Spain, thus encompassing the Stone raft.","PeriodicalId":36376,"journal":{"name":"Rubrica Contemporanea","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rubrica Contemporanea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/rubrica.270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to study how issues related to the European Economic Community/European Union (EEC/EU) are presented in Portuguese 9th-grade History textbooks. The methodological approach is mainly qualitative, based on a content analysis of ten textbooks, but some quantitative data was also considered in order to determine the importance given to the EEC/EU construction process and Portugal’s integration into it. It can be concluded that although the history textbooks contain some information about the political construction process, the institutions of the EEC/EU and its economic and social policies, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of Portugal’s integration into the EU, the information is mainly presented from a linear perspective and does not prioritise the development of students’ critical thinking. This study also points to a predominance of content related to national citizenship, the concept of European citizenship being presented in a brief and normative way. Our intention, in the near future, is to expand on this study, with a comparative study between Portugal and Spain, thus encompassing the Stone raft.
“石筏”的边缘。葡萄牙历史教科书从欧元热情到适度怀疑(2000-2020)
本文旨在研究与欧洲经济共同体/欧盟(EEC/EU)有关的问题如何在葡萄牙九年级历史教科书中呈现。方法方法主要是定性的,基于十本教科书的内容分析,但也考虑了一些定量数据,以确定欧洲经济共同体/欧盟建设过程和葡萄牙融入其中的重要性。可以得出结论,虽然历史教科书中包含了一些关于政治建设过程,欧洲经济共同体/欧盟的制度及其经济和社会政策,以及葡萄牙加入欧盟的利弊的信息,但这些信息主要是从线性角度呈现的,并没有优先考虑学生批判性思维的发展。这项研究还指出,与国家公民身份有关的内容占主导地位,欧洲公民身份的概念以一种简短而规范的方式提出。在不久的将来,我们的意图是扩展这项研究,在葡萄牙和西班牙之间进行比较研究,从而包括石头筏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rubrica Contemporanea
Rubrica Contemporanea Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信