Diagnostic Model of In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Used Artificial Intelligence Methods

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yong Li
{"title":"Diagnostic Model of In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Used Artificial Intelligence Methods","authors":"Yong Li","doi":"10.1155/2022/8758617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Preventing in-hospital mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a crucial step. Objectives The objective of our research was to develop and externally validate the diagnostic model of in-hospital mortality in acute STEMI patients used artificial intelligence methods. Methods We divided nonrandomly the American population with acute STEMI into a training set, a test set, and a validation set. We converted the unbalanced data into balanced data. We used artificial intelligence methods to develop and externally validate several diagnostic models. We used confusion matrix combined with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to evaluate the pros and cons of the above models. Results The strongest predictors of in-hospital mortality were age, gender, cardiogenic shock, atrial fibrillation (AF), ventricular fibrillation (VF), third degree atrioventricular block, in-hospital bleeding, underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during hospitalization, underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) during hospitalization, hypertension history, diabetes history, and myocardial infarction history. The F2 score of logistic regression in the training set, the test set, and the validation dataset was 0.81, 0.6, and 0.59, respectively. The AUC of logistic regression in the training set, the test set, and the validation data set was 0.77, 0.78, and 0.8, respectively. The diagnostic model built by logistic regression was the best. Conclusion The strongest predictors of in-hospital mortality were age, gender, cardiogenic shock, AF, VF, third degree atrioventricular block, in-hospital bleeding, underwent PCI during hospitalization, underwent CABG during hospitalization, hypertension history, diabetes history, and myocardial infarction history. We had used artificial intelligence methods developed and externally validated several diagnostic models of in-hospital mortality in acute STEMI patients. The diagnostic model built by logistic regression was the best. We registered this study with the registration number ChiCTR1900027129 (the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) on 1 November 2019).","PeriodicalId":9494,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research and Practice","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8758617","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Preventing in-hospital mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a crucial step. Objectives The objective of our research was to develop and externally validate the diagnostic model of in-hospital mortality in acute STEMI patients used artificial intelligence methods. Methods We divided nonrandomly the American population with acute STEMI into a training set, a test set, and a validation set. We converted the unbalanced data into balanced data. We used artificial intelligence methods to develop and externally validate several diagnostic models. We used confusion matrix combined with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to evaluate the pros and cons of the above models. Results The strongest predictors of in-hospital mortality were age, gender, cardiogenic shock, atrial fibrillation (AF), ventricular fibrillation (VF), third degree atrioventricular block, in-hospital bleeding, underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during hospitalization, underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) during hospitalization, hypertension history, diabetes history, and myocardial infarction history. The F2 score of logistic regression in the training set, the test set, and the validation dataset was 0.81, 0.6, and 0.59, respectively. The AUC of logistic regression in the training set, the test set, and the validation data set was 0.77, 0.78, and 0.8, respectively. The diagnostic model built by logistic regression was the best. Conclusion The strongest predictors of in-hospital mortality were age, gender, cardiogenic shock, AF, VF, third degree atrioventricular block, in-hospital bleeding, underwent PCI during hospitalization, underwent CABG during hospitalization, hypertension history, diabetes history, and myocardial infarction history. We had used artificial intelligence methods developed and externally validated several diagnostic models of in-hospital mortality in acute STEMI patients. The diagnostic model built by logistic regression was the best. We registered this study with the registration number ChiCTR1900027129 (the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) on 1 November 2019).
基于人工智能方法的急性st段抬高型心肌梗死住院死亡率诊断模型
预防st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的住院死亡率是至关重要的一步。本研究的目的是利用人工智能方法开发并外部验证急性STEMI患者住院死亡率的诊断模型。方法:我们将美国急性STEMI患者非随机分为训练组、测试组和验证组。我们将不平衡数据转换为平衡数据。我们使用人工智能方法开发和外部验证了几个诊断模型。我们使用混淆矩阵结合受者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)来评价上述模型的优缺点。结果院内死亡率最强预测因子为年龄、性别、心源性休克、房颤(AF)、室颤(VF)、房室传导阻滞、院内出血、住院期间行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)、住院期间行冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)、高血压史、糖尿病史、心肌梗死史。logistic回归在训练集、测试集和验证集上的F2得分分别为0.81、0.6和0.59。训练集、测试集和验证数据集的logistic回归AUC分别为0.77、0.78和0.8。采用logistic回归建立的诊断模型效果最好。结论年龄、性别、心源性休克、房颤、室颤、三度房室传导阻滞、院内出血、住院期间行PCI、住院期间行冠脉搭桥、高血压史、糖尿病史、心梗史是院内死亡率的最强预测因子。我们使用人工智能方法开发并外部验证了急性STEMI患者住院死亡率的几种诊断模型。采用logistic回归建立的诊断模型效果最好。我们于2019年11月1日在世卫组织国际临床试验注册平台(ictr1900027129)注册了该研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiology Research and Practice
Cardiology Research and Practice Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Cardiology Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies that focus on the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. The journal welcomes submissions related to systemic hypertension, arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, vascular disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信