Assessing Mathematics and Science Self-Efficacy Beliefs for Teaching

IF 2.8 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Edmund Anamboi Aduko, Emmanuel Issah Azuuga, Adakudugu Edward Apenen, Anthony Baawuo
{"title":"Assessing Mathematics and Science Self-Efficacy Beliefs for Teaching","authors":"Edmund Anamboi Aduko, Emmanuel Issah Azuuga, Adakudugu Edward Apenen, Anthony Baawuo","doi":"10.5296/jse.v12i3.20010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study used a questionnaire survey to collect quantitative data from respondents. The independent variables of interest were level of math and science self-efficacy beliefs, as well as self-efficacy for teaching math and science. The questionnaire survey was voluntarily completed by 60 teachers, comprising 45 male and 15 female. The respondents ranged in age from 19 to 38 years. The findings of the study revealed that the mathematics and science teachers at the basic school had high level of self-efficacy beliefs. The study further discovered that though not strong, there is a positive relationship between math and science teachers’ self-efficacy and their ability to teach math and science. The findings also found that math and science teachers’ scores on the MSSEB scale for mathematics and science self-efficacy beliefs were generally higher than their scores on the SETMS scale for self-efficacy for teaching mathematics and science. The ability to effectively explain math /science concepts to students received the lowest mean rating in comparison to others. Teachers' self-efficacy beliefs and self-efficacy can be important considerations for teacher professional development training as a powerful intervening factor for teacher effectiveness and student performance outcomes.","PeriodicalId":47802,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Studies in International Education","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Studies in International Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5296/jse.v12i3.20010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study used a questionnaire survey to collect quantitative data from respondents. The independent variables of interest were level of math and science self-efficacy beliefs, as well as self-efficacy for teaching math and science. The questionnaire survey was voluntarily completed by 60 teachers, comprising 45 male and 15 female. The respondents ranged in age from 19 to 38 years. The findings of the study revealed that the mathematics and science teachers at the basic school had high level of self-efficacy beliefs. The study further discovered that though not strong, there is a positive relationship between math and science teachers’ self-efficacy and their ability to teach math and science. The findings also found that math and science teachers’ scores on the MSSEB scale for mathematics and science self-efficacy beliefs were generally higher than their scores on the SETMS scale for self-efficacy for teaching mathematics and science. The ability to effectively explain math /science concepts to students received the lowest mean rating in comparison to others. Teachers' self-efficacy beliefs and self-efficacy can be important considerations for teacher professional development training as a powerful intervening factor for teacher effectiveness and student performance outcomes.
数学与科学教学自我效能信念之评估
该研究采用问卷调查的方式收集受访者的定量数据。感兴趣的自变量为数学和科学自我效能感信念水平,以及数学和科学教学自我效能感。问卷调查由60名教师自愿完成,其中男45名,女15名。受访者的年龄从19岁到38岁不等。研究发现,基础学校数理教师具有较高的自我效能感信念。研究进一步发现,虽然数学和科学教师的自我效能感与他们的数学和科学教学能力之间存在着不强的正相关关系。研究结果还发现,数学和科学教师在MSSEB数学和科学自我效能感量表上的得分普遍高于他们在SETMS数学和科学教学自我效能感量表上的得分。有效地向学生解释数学/科学概念的能力与其他能力相比得到了最低的平均评分。教师的自我效能感信念和自我效能感是教师专业发展培训的重要考虑因素,是教师效能感和学生绩效结果的有力干预因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Studies in International Education
Journal of Studies in International Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: To broaden the discourse on the role of international cooperation and exchange in developing the human capacity to work in a global setting, the Journal of Studies in International Education provides a forum combining the research of scholars, models from practitioners in the public or private sector, and essays. The journal publishes research, essays, and reviews on international education. Articles place issues at the primary, secondary, higher education, professional exchange, and lifelong learning levels in a global context. Topics include: study abroad; curriculum reform; faculty development; and development assistance. Articles on related topics such as public policy and internationalization strategies also appear in the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信