A Collaborative Self Study of Critical Digital Pedagogies in Teacher Education

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jamilee Baroud, Pooja Dharamshi
{"title":"A Collaborative Self Study of Critical Digital Pedagogies in Teacher Education","authors":"Jamilee Baroud, Pooja Dharamshi","doi":"10.1080/17425964.2020.1739639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article explores the critical digital practices and pedagogies of two novice teacher educators. Employing self-study research methodologies, we examine our collaborations and integrations of critical digital practices into two literacy methods teacher education courses. Seeking to emphasize the ‘critical’ aspects of critical digital literacies, we co-planned and designed learning opportunities, which deliberately considered social, cultural, and ethical issues related to learning with and from digital technologies. Data were collected from the memos and shared on-line reflections recorded from our weekly meetings over the course of four months. This self-study helped us to understand our conceptualizations and enactments of critical digital pedagogies for teacher education. We developed a deeper understanding of the opportunities and challenges present when integrating critical digital texts into the curriculum. The planning, ongoing reflection and revisions of the course were meaningful, however, were time-consuming in nature. We argue this work should not be left solely to teacher educators; rather, teacher preparation programs must play a larger role in preparing and supporting teacher educators with both the technical and pedagogical know-how of meaningfully designing and integrating critical digital practices into their courses.","PeriodicalId":45793,"journal":{"name":"Studying Teacher Education","volume":"15 1","pages":"164 - 182"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studying Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2020.1739639","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article explores the critical digital practices and pedagogies of two novice teacher educators. Employing self-study research methodologies, we examine our collaborations and integrations of critical digital practices into two literacy methods teacher education courses. Seeking to emphasize the ‘critical’ aspects of critical digital literacies, we co-planned and designed learning opportunities, which deliberately considered social, cultural, and ethical issues related to learning with and from digital technologies. Data were collected from the memos and shared on-line reflections recorded from our weekly meetings over the course of four months. This self-study helped us to understand our conceptualizations and enactments of critical digital pedagogies for teacher education. We developed a deeper understanding of the opportunities and challenges present when integrating critical digital texts into the curriculum. The planning, ongoing reflection and revisions of the course were meaningful, however, were time-consuming in nature. We argue this work should not be left solely to teacher educators; rather, teacher preparation programs must play a larger role in preparing and supporting teacher educators with both the technical and pedagogical know-how of meaningfully designing and integrating critical digital practices into their courses.
教师教育中批判性数字教学法的协同自我研究
本文探讨了两位新教师教育家的关键数字实践和教学法。采用自学研究方法,我们研究了我们的合作和关键数字实践整合到两种素养方法教师教育课程。为了强调关键数字素养的“关键”方面,我们共同规划和设计了学习机会,刻意考虑了与数字技术学习相关的社会、文化和伦理问题。数据是从备忘录中收集的,并在四个月的时间里,从我们每周的会议中记录下来的在线反思中分享。这次自学帮助我们理解了我们对教师教育的关键数字教学法的概念和实施。当将关键的数字文本整合到课程中时,我们对当前的机遇和挑战有了更深入的了解。课程的规划、持续的反思和修订是有意义的,但本质上是耗时的。我们认为这项工作不应该只留给教师教育者;相反,教师培训项目必须发挥更大的作用,为教师教育工作者提供准备和支持,使他们具备有意义地设计和整合关键数字实践的技术和教学知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studying Teacher Education
Studying Teacher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
43.80%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Studying Teacher Education invites submissions from authors who have a strong interest in improving the quality of teaching generally and of teacher education in particular. The central purpose of the journal is to disseminate high-quality research and dialogue in self-study of teacher education practices. Thus the journal is primarily a forum for teacher educators who work in contexts and programs of teacher education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信