The Power of Elites: A Survey Experiment of the Impact of Strategic Messaging on Donations to Nonprofits

IF 2.2 4区 社会学 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
C. Fleming, Anne-Lise K. Velez, Christopher R. Prentice
{"title":"The Power of Elites: A Survey Experiment of the Impact of Strategic Messaging on Donations to Nonprofits","authors":"C. Fleming, Anne-Lise K. Velez, Christopher R. Prentice","doi":"10.1080/23303131.2022.2158152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Nonprofits engage in various service and advocacy efforts to support their missions, and it is critical to effectively communicate the importance of these activities and their missions to donors. In these communications, it remains unclear the extent to which messaging from nonprofit elites such as coalitions and other nonprofit infrastructure organizations (NIOs) shapes donor support for service and advocacy activities, and which messages exhibit the strongest influence on donors. This survey experiment tests the effects of three strategic messages from a fictional NIO on respondents’ allocation of donation budgets between traditionally service-oriented nonprofits engaging in varying levels of service and advocacy activities. Results show messages promoting advocacy and social change yield substantial donation increases to nonprofits engaging in low and high levels of advocacy work. Messages pushing direct service failed to produce effects on donor intentions; however, findings suggest direct service may enjoy an inherent advantage in donor preference.","PeriodicalId":46043,"journal":{"name":"Human Service Organizations Management Leadership & Governance","volume":"12 1","pages":"99 - 121"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Service Organizations Management Leadership & Governance","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2022.2158152","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Nonprofits engage in various service and advocacy efforts to support their missions, and it is critical to effectively communicate the importance of these activities and their missions to donors. In these communications, it remains unclear the extent to which messaging from nonprofit elites such as coalitions and other nonprofit infrastructure organizations (NIOs) shapes donor support for service and advocacy activities, and which messages exhibit the strongest influence on donors. This survey experiment tests the effects of three strategic messages from a fictional NIO on respondents’ allocation of donation budgets between traditionally service-oriented nonprofits engaging in varying levels of service and advocacy activities. Results show messages promoting advocacy and social change yield substantial donation increases to nonprofits engaging in low and high levels of advocacy work. Messages pushing direct service failed to produce effects on donor intentions; however, findings suggest direct service may enjoy an inherent advantage in donor preference.
精英的力量:战略信息对非营利组织捐款影响的调查实验
非营利组织从事各种服务和宣传工作来支持他们的使命,有效地将这些活动和使命的重要性传达给捐助者是至关重要的。在这些沟通中,目前尚不清楚来自非营利精英(如联盟和其他非营利基础设施组织)的信息在多大程度上影响了捐助者对服务和倡导活动的支持,以及哪些信息对捐助者的影响最大。本调查实验测试了一个虚构的NIO的三个战略信息对受访者在从事不同水平的服务和倡导活动的传统服务型非营利组织之间分配捐赠预算的影响。结果显示,倡导倡导和社会变革的信息使从事低水平和高水平倡导工作的非营利组织的捐款大幅增加。推动直接服务的信息未能对捐助者的意图产生影响;然而,研究结果表明,直接服务可能在捐赠者偏好方面具有内在优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信