Human Sciences: Another Experience of Substantiating Socio-Humanitarian Knowledge

Ольга Васильевна Плебанек, O. Plebanek
{"title":"Human Sciences: Another Experience of Substantiating Socio-Humanitarian Knowledge","authors":"Ольга Васильевна Плебанек, O. Plebanek","doi":"10.32603/2412-8562-2023-9-3-5-17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The  article  raises  the  problem  of  methodological  foundations  of  sociohumanitarian knowledge. The opinion that has been established since the constitution of the  social  and  humanitarian  sciences  that  there  are  fundamental  differences  in  the methodology of natural science and socio-humanitarian knowledge has become perceived as an axiom. This situation did not contribute to the creation of an adequate theory capable of sufficiently implementing the explanatory and predictive functions of science in this area.Methodology and sources. Obstacles to the creation of an adequate methodology for the study of human existence are misunderstood thesis about the specifics of socio-humanitarian knowledge and inadequate understanding of the nature of the object of socio-humanitarian knowledge. The unity of criteria and standards of scientific research in the natural sciences and socio-humanitarian sciences is achieved on the basis of the post-non-classical model of science. The concept of scientific paradigms developed by V.S. Stepin can serve as a source of a new approach to the formation of the methodology of socio-humanitarian knowledge.Results and discussion. The classical model of scientific research posited the opposite of the method of natural and socio-humanitarian sciences on the basis of the opposite of the methods of mastering the objects of research: sensory means and intelligible. In this way, indeed, it is impossible to combine the criteria and standards of science in relation to natural science and socio-humanitarian research.Conclusion. The post-non-classical model of science is based on the understanding of the research  object  from  the  point  of  view  of  its  structure,  which  allows  us  to  consider  the phenomena of human existence as having a single nature with the object of natural science, since in both cases, objects have a complex, systemic nature and belong to self-developing objects.","PeriodicalId":75784,"journal":{"name":"Dental Discourse","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Discourse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2023-9-3-5-17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The  article  raises  the  problem  of  methodological  foundations  of  sociohumanitarian knowledge. The opinion that has been established since the constitution of the  social  and  humanitarian  sciences  that  there  are  fundamental  differences  in  the methodology of natural science and socio-humanitarian knowledge has become perceived as an axiom. This situation did not contribute to the creation of an adequate theory capable of sufficiently implementing the explanatory and predictive functions of science in this area.Methodology and sources. Obstacles to the creation of an adequate methodology for the study of human existence are misunderstood thesis about the specifics of socio-humanitarian knowledge and inadequate understanding of the nature of the object of socio-humanitarian knowledge. The unity of criteria and standards of scientific research in the natural sciences and socio-humanitarian sciences is achieved on the basis of the post-non-classical model of science. The concept of scientific paradigms developed by V.S. Stepin can serve as a source of a new approach to the formation of the methodology of socio-humanitarian knowledge.Results and discussion. The classical model of scientific research posited the opposite of the method of natural and socio-humanitarian sciences on the basis of the opposite of the methods of mastering the objects of research: sensory means and intelligible. In this way, indeed, it is impossible to combine the criteria and standards of science in relation to natural science and socio-humanitarian research.Conclusion. The post-non-classical model of science is based on the understanding of the research  object  from  the  point  of  view  of  its  structure,  which  allows  us  to  consider  the phenomena of human existence as having a single nature with the object of natural science, since in both cases, objects have a complex, systemic nature and belong to self-developing objects.
人文科学:社会人文知识实体化的另一种经验
介绍。本文提出了社会人道主义知识的方法论基础问题。自社会科学和人道主义科学成立以来所确立的观点,即自然科学和社会人道主义知识的方法论存在根本差异,已被视为一个公理。这种情况无助于创造一种适当的理论,能够充分发挥科学在这一领域的解释和预测功能。方法和来源。建立研究人类存在的适当方法的障碍是对社会-人道主义知识的特殊性的误解和对社会-人道主义知识对象的性质的不充分理解。自然科学与社会人文科学研究标准的统一是在后非经典科学模式的基础上实现的。由V.S. Stepin发展的科学范式概念可以作为形成社会人道主义知识方法论的新途径的来源。结果和讨论。科学研究的经典模式假定了自然科学和社会人文科学方法的对立面,其基础是掌握研究对象的方法的对立面:感官手段和可理解性。这样,就不可能把科学的标准和标准与自然科学和社会人文主义研究结合起来。后非经典的科学模式是建立在从研究对象的结构角度来理解研究对象的基础上的,它允许我们将人类存在的现象与自然科学的对象看作是具有单一性质的,因为在这两种情况下,对象都具有复杂的、系统的性质,并且属于自我发展的对象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信