O. Moran, Dina Nikitina, A. Gunasekara, M. Yaffe, K. Metcalfe, S. Narod, J. Kotsopoulos
{"title":"Abstract B12: The effect of physical activity and body size on mammographic density in high-risk, BRCA mutation-negative women","authors":"O. Moran, Dina Nikitina, A. Gunasekara, M. Yaffe, K. Metcalfe, S. Narod, J. Kotsopoulos","doi":"10.1158/1538-7755.CARISK16-B12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Mammographic density (MD) reflects the proportion of dense tissue in relation to non-dense tissue in the breast and is the strongest biological marker of breast cancer risk. MD is known to be higher among women with a family history compared to women in the general population. We have previously demonstrated that women with a strong family history of breast cancer but no BRCA mutation face an elevated lifetime risk of breast cancer estimated at 40% compared to 11% in the general population. Various lifestyle factors, such as physical activity and body mass index (BMI), have been shown to modify MD in the general population. It is of interest to determine if such an association exists among high-risk women. Objective: To evaluate the relationship between physical activity, BMI and MD in high-risk women. Methods: This study included 100 women enrolled in an on-going prospective study of high-risk women with a strong family history of breast cancer (two first-degree relatives with breast cancer under age 50 or three cases at any age) and no identified BRCA mutations in their families. Current physical activity levels and BMI were collected using self-reported questionnaires. Physical activity was defined as moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Two dichotomous variables were created to define high vs. low MVPA levels: 1) based on the Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology guideline of 2.5 hours of MVPA per week and 2) the 75th percentile of MVPA in the sample (3.5 hours per week). A BMI of 25 or more was defined as high using the World Health Organization criteria of overweight. Mammograms were assigned a percentage of density (0 - 100%) using a computer-assisted method (Cumulus 6). Multivariate linear regression modelling was used to evaluate the relationships between both MVPA and BMI with MD while adjusting for age, menopausal status, and parity. BMI models also adjusted for MVPA (continuous) and MVPA models adjusted for BMI (continuous). Results: Among all women, those with a high BMI had significantly lower mean percent density compared to women with a low BMI (13% vs. 23%; P = 0.01). This association was stronger for premenopausal (27% vs. 37%; P = 0.06) vs. postmenopausal (12% vs. 20%; P = 0.10) women. Women who engaged in MVPA for 2.5 hours per week or more had significantly greater mean percent density compared to women who were less physically active (29% vs. 22%; P = 0.04). This relationship did not vary by menopausal status (P ≥ 0.15). Based on the 75th percentile of MVPA, women with high MVPA levels had significantly greater mean percent density compared to women with low MVPA levels (31% vs. 22%; P = 0.02). This relationship was significant for postmenopausal (26% vs. 13%; P = 0.04) but not premenopausal (31% vs. 25%; P = 0.27) women. Conclusion: In this cohort of high-risk women, high BMI was associated with lower MD that was suggestively stronger for premenopausal women. Although preliminary, these findings suggest a possible mechanism by which a lifestyle factor may influence MD, and possibly breast cancer risk, in high-risk women. Further evaluation with a larger sample size is needed to elucidate the relationships between physical activity, as well as other modifiable factors, and MD in this cohort of women. This study adds to the growing evidence supporting the inclusion of MD into breast cancer risk prediction models, in order to improve individualized treatments and prevention strategies for women at an increased risk for disease. Citation Format: Olivia M. Moran, Dina Nikitina, Anoma Gunasekara, Martin J. Yaffe, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Steven A. Narod, Joanne Kotsopoulos. The effect of physical activity and body size on mammographic density in high-risk, BRCA mutation-negative women. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Improving Cancer Risk Prediction for Prevention and Early Detection; Nov 16-19, 2016; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2017;26(5 Suppl):Abstract nr B12.","PeriodicalId":9487,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Biomarkers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Biomarkers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7755.CARISK16-B12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Mammographic density (MD) reflects the proportion of dense tissue in relation to non-dense tissue in the breast and is the strongest biological marker of breast cancer risk. MD is known to be higher among women with a family history compared to women in the general population. We have previously demonstrated that women with a strong family history of breast cancer but no BRCA mutation face an elevated lifetime risk of breast cancer estimated at 40% compared to 11% in the general population. Various lifestyle factors, such as physical activity and body mass index (BMI), have been shown to modify MD in the general population. It is of interest to determine if such an association exists among high-risk women. Objective: To evaluate the relationship between physical activity, BMI and MD in high-risk women. Methods: This study included 100 women enrolled in an on-going prospective study of high-risk women with a strong family history of breast cancer (two first-degree relatives with breast cancer under age 50 or three cases at any age) and no identified BRCA mutations in their families. Current physical activity levels and BMI were collected using self-reported questionnaires. Physical activity was defined as moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Two dichotomous variables were created to define high vs. low MVPA levels: 1) based on the Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology guideline of 2.5 hours of MVPA per week and 2) the 75th percentile of MVPA in the sample (3.5 hours per week). A BMI of 25 or more was defined as high using the World Health Organization criteria of overweight. Mammograms were assigned a percentage of density (0 - 100%) using a computer-assisted method (Cumulus 6). Multivariate linear regression modelling was used to evaluate the relationships between both MVPA and BMI with MD while adjusting for age, menopausal status, and parity. BMI models also adjusted for MVPA (continuous) and MVPA models adjusted for BMI (continuous). Results: Among all women, those with a high BMI had significantly lower mean percent density compared to women with a low BMI (13% vs. 23%; P = 0.01). This association was stronger for premenopausal (27% vs. 37%; P = 0.06) vs. postmenopausal (12% vs. 20%; P = 0.10) women. Women who engaged in MVPA for 2.5 hours per week or more had significantly greater mean percent density compared to women who were less physically active (29% vs. 22%; P = 0.04). This relationship did not vary by menopausal status (P ≥ 0.15). Based on the 75th percentile of MVPA, women with high MVPA levels had significantly greater mean percent density compared to women with low MVPA levels (31% vs. 22%; P = 0.02). This relationship was significant for postmenopausal (26% vs. 13%; P = 0.04) but not premenopausal (31% vs. 25%; P = 0.27) women. Conclusion: In this cohort of high-risk women, high BMI was associated with lower MD that was suggestively stronger for premenopausal women. Although preliminary, these findings suggest a possible mechanism by which a lifestyle factor may influence MD, and possibly breast cancer risk, in high-risk women. Further evaluation with a larger sample size is needed to elucidate the relationships between physical activity, as well as other modifiable factors, and MD in this cohort of women. This study adds to the growing evidence supporting the inclusion of MD into breast cancer risk prediction models, in order to improve individualized treatments and prevention strategies for women at an increased risk for disease. Citation Format: Olivia M. Moran, Dina Nikitina, Anoma Gunasekara, Martin J. Yaffe, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Steven A. Narod, Joanne Kotsopoulos. The effect of physical activity and body size on mammographic density in high-risk, BRCA mutation-negative women. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Improving Cancer Risk Prediction for Prevention and Early Detection; Nov 16-19, 2016; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2017;26(5 Suppl):Abstract nr B12.
目的:乳腺密度(MD)反映乳腺中致密组织相对于非致密组织的比例,是乳腺癌风险最强的生物学标志物。众所周知,有家族病史的女性患MD的几率比一般人群中的女性高。我们之前已经证明,有强烈的乳腺癌家族史但没有BRCA突变的女性一生中患乳腺癌的风险估计为40%,而普通人群的这一风险为11%。各种生活方式因素,如体力活动和身体质量指数(BMI),已被证明可以改变普通人群的MD。确定这种关联是否存在于高危妇女中是有意义的。目的:探讨高危女性身体活动、BMI与MD的关系。方法:本研究纳入了100名女性,她们参加了一项正在进行的前瞻性研究,这些女性具有强烈的乳腺癌家族史(两名一级亲属患有50岁以下的乳腺癌或三例任何年龄的乳腺癌),她们的家庭中没有发现BRCA突变。目前的身体活动水平和身体质量指数是通过自我报告的问卷收集的。体力活动定义为中度至剧烈体力活动(MVPA)。创建了两个二分类变量来定义高与低MVPA水平:1)基于加拿大运动生理学协会每周2.5小时的MVPA指南,2)样本中第75百分位的MVPA(每周3.5小时)。根据世界卫生组织(World Health Organization)的超重标准,BMI≥25被定义为超重。使用计算机辅助方法(Cumulus 6)为乳房x线照片分配密度百分比(0 - 100%)。在调整年龄、绝经状态和胎次的同时,使用多元线性回归模型评估MVPA和BMI与MD之间的关系。BMI模型也根据MVPA(连续)和MVPA模型根据BMI(连续)进行调整。结果:在所有女性中,BMI指数高的女性的平均百分比密度明显低于BMI指数低的女性(13%对23%;P = 0.01)。绝经前患者的相关性更强(27% vs 37%;P = 0.06) vs.绝经后(12% vs. 20%;P = 0.10)。每周从事MVPA 2.5小时或更长时间的女性与体力活动较少的女性相比,其平均百分比密度显著更高(29%对22%;P = 0.04)。这种关系没有因绝经状态而改变(P≥0.15)。根据MVPA的第75百分位,MVPA水平高的女性比MVPA水平低的女性有更大的平均百分比密度(31%比22%;P = 0.02)。这种关系在绝经后人群中更为显著(26% vs. 13%;P = 0.04),但绝经前(31% vs. 25%;P = 0.27)。结论:在这组高危妇女中,高BMI与低MD相关,绝经前妇女的低MD更明显。虽然是初步的,但这些发现提示了一种可能的机制,即生活方式因素可能影响高危女性的MD,并可能影响乳腺癌风险。需要更大样本量的进一步评估来阐明体力活动以及其他可改变因素与该女性队列中MD之间的关系。越来越多的证据支持将MD纳入乳腺癌风险预测模型,从而为患病风险增加的女性改善个体化治疗和预防策略。引文格式:Olivia M. Moran, Dina Nikitina, Anoma Gunasekara, Martin J. Yaffe, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Steven A. Narod, Joanne Kotsopoulos。BRCA突变阴性的高危女性,体力活动和体型对乳房x线摄影密度的影响[摘要]。摘自:AACR特别会议论文集:改进癌症风险预测以预防和早期发现;2016年11月16日至19日;费城(PA): AACR;Cancer epidemiology Biomarkers pre2017;26(5增刊):摘要nr B12。