Description and Pilot Evaluation of a Dreamer Ally Training for Higher Education Staff and Faculty

Q2 Social Sciences
E. McWhirter, Kristin E. Yarris, B. O. Rojas-Araúz
{"title":"Description and Pilot Evaluation of a Dreamer Ally Training for Higher Education Staff and Faculty","authors":"E. McWhirter, Kristin E. Yarris, B. O. Rojas-Araúz","doi":"10.33043/jsacp.13.1.2-22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We describe a Dreamer Ally training provided to staff and faculty on a university campus and present results of a pilot evaluation of this training. The Dreamer Ally training was designed to (a) increase university faculty and staff awareness, understanding, and self-efficacy for working with Dreamer students and (b) stimulate action to make the campus more responsive to the challenges and contributions of Dreamer students. For the purpose of this study we define Dreamer students as inclusive of undocumented students, students with the temporary protection of DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals), students who qualify for the state’s tuition equity program, and students from mixed legal status families. Study goals were to describe the training, gather pilot data on participant learning goals, post-training satisfaction and self-efficacy for supporting Dreamer students, and generate participant feedback about utility of training components and their plans for subsequent action. Participants completed questionnaires before and after the training. Responses to open-ended questions indicated that most participants attended in order to learn how to better support Dreamer students. Paired samples (pre and post) t-tests indicated significantly higher self-efficacy for supporting Dreamer students at posttest. Participant satisfaction with the training was high and found the information session content and working through different Dreamer student scenarios most useful. Action plans included changing program or unit websites to be more inclusive of Dreamers. Limitations include the absence of a control group. Findings can inform institutional efforts to raise faculty and staff awareness of and responsiveness to the challenges facing Dreamer students.","PeriodicalId":37436,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Social Action in Counseling and Psychology","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Social Action in Counseling and Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33043/jsacp.13.1.2-22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

We describe a Dreamer Ally training provided to staff and faculty on a university campus and present results of a pilot evaluation of this training. The Dreamer Ally training was designed to (a) increase university faculty and staff awareness, understanding, and self-efficacy for working with Dreamer students and (b) stimulate action to make the campus more responsive to the challenges and contributions of Dreamer students. For the purpose of this study we define Dreamer students as inclusive of undocumented students, students with the temporary protection of DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals), students who qualify for the state’s tuition equity program, and students from mixed legal status families. Study goals were to describe the training, gather pilot data on participant learning goals, post-training satisfaction and self-efficacy for supporting Dreamer students, and generate participant feedback about utility of training components and their plans for subsequent action. Participants completed questionnaires before and after the training. Responses to open-ended questions indicated that most participants attended in order to learn how to better support Dreamer students. Paired samples (pre and post) t-tests indicated significantly higher self-efficacy for supporting Dreamer students at posttest. Participant satisfaction with the training was high and found the information session content and working through different Dreamer student scenarios most useful. Action plans included changing program or unit websites to be more inclusive of Dreamers. Limitations include the absence of a control group. Findings can inform institutional efforts to raise faculty and staff awareness of and responsiveness to the challenges facing Dreamer students.
高等教育教职员工梦想家联盟培训的描述与试点评估
我们描述了在大学校园里为教职员工提供的梦想家联盟培训,并介绍了对该培训进行试点评估的结果。“梦想家联盟”培训旨在:(a)提高大学教职员工与梦想家学生合作的意识、理解和自我效能感;(b)激发行动,使校园对梦想家学生的挑战和贡献做出更积极的回应。为了本研究的目的,我们将“梦想家学生”定义为包括无证学生、获得DACA临时保护的学生、符合州学费公平计划资格的学生以及来自混合合法身份家庭的学生。研究目标是描述培训,收集关于参与者学习目标、培训后满意度和自我效能的试点数据,以支持梦想家学生,并生成参与者关于培训内容的效用和他们后续行动计划的反馈。参与者在培训前后都完成了问卷调查。对开放式问题的回答表明,大多数参与者参加活动是为了学习如何更好地支持梦想家学生。配对样本(前后)t检验显示,支持梦想家学生的自我效能在后测中显著提高。参与者对培训的满意度很高,并发现信息会议的内容和通过不同的梦想家学生场景的工作最有用。行动计划包括改变项目或单位网站,使之更加包容梦想家。局限性包括没有对照组。研究结果可以为机构提供信息,以提高教职员工对梦想家学生面临的挑战的认识和反应能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal for Social Action in Counseling and Psychology
Journal for Social Action in Counseling and Psychology Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: The Journal for Social Action in Counseling and Psychology promotes deep reflection on community change and system transformation in which counselors, psychologists, and other human service professionals play a role. This open access journal aims to highlight ‘engaged scholarship’ and the very important social change work done by professionals and activists that would not normally find its way into publication. The journal attempts to break down the divide between theory and practice in one of the most critical areas of our work: social transformation toward social and ecological justice and peace. This journal features action oriented articles, meaning manuscripts that discuss actual work (e.g., advocacy, activism, research, policy formulation and implementation, training, legislation) that has been conducted by the submitting author(s) and not proposed work or simple conceptualizations of issues. JSACP features four unique sections: -Activism and Advocacy -Education and Training -Policy and Theory -Program Development and Evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信