The Reception of The Resisting Reader, Early and Late

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Reception-Texts Readers Audiences History Pub Date : 2021-07-10 DOI:10.5325/reception.13.1.0024

Charlene Avallone

引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract:An analysis of the reviews of The Resisting Reader and of early academic responses shows that literary and feminist scholars quickly welcomed the work, while reader studies came more slowly to a positive appreciation of it. Judith Fetterley’s theory of feminist resistant reading has extended across multiple fields and outside of the academy to become newly relevant today.

查看原文本刊更多论文

抵制读者的接受，早与晚

对《抗拒的读者》的评论和早期学术反应的分析表明，文学和女权主义学者很快就对这部作品表示欢迎，而读者研究对它的积极评价则来得更慢。朱迪思·费特利的女权主义抵抗阅读理论已经扩展到多个领域，并在学术界之外，在今天变得新的相关。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Reception-Texts Readers Audiences History HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

0.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Reception: Texts, Readers, Audiences, History is a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal published once a year. It seeks to promote dialog and discussion among scholars engaged in theoretical and practical analyses in several related fields: reader-response criticism and pedagogy, reception study, history of reading and the book, audience and communication studies, institutional studies and histories, as well as interpretive strategies related to feminism, race and ethnicity, gender and sexuality, and postcolonial studies, focusing mainly but not exclusively on the literature, culture, and media of England and the United States.