The Last Cigarette
IF 0.1
4区 艺术学
0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION
Daniel Eltringham
求助PDF
{"title":"The Last Cigarette","authors":"Daniel Eltringham","doi":"10.13110/criticism.63.3.0313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Criticism 63.3_07_Eltringham.indd Page 313 12/07/21 6:09 pm Criticism Summer 2021, Vol. 63, No. 3, pp. 313–318. ISSN 0011-1589. doi: 10.13110/criticism.63.3.0313 © 2021 by Wayne State University Press, Detroit, Michigan 48201-1309 As a temporal category “the Anthropocene” makes a fundamental claim about periodicity: the geological age of the anthropos is upon us, or “we” have ushered it in, and it is categorically distinct from what came before (geologically, the Holocene). Subjectively, this idea induces the nauseous vertigo of living as subjects in two radically incommensurate times at once: what Anne-Lise François calls “the simultaneity of speed and slow time. . . . To listen to the geologists, the Anthropocene would be humanity’s last cigarette, a name for the fast consumption of deep time.” Such a disjunctive “poetics of thick time,” to name one of the central modes David Farrier identifies in Anthropocene Poetics, is corralled in a particularly persistent way, he argues, by “lyric’s capacity to pull multiple temporalities and scales within a single frame” (9). One of the many virtues of this book is the way in which Farrier’s sustained focus on the viscous “now” of lyric address enables his close-reading practice to trespass the bounds of the words on the page, in order to access deep times that he reveals to be snagged in the trellises of stanzaic structure. Throughout, these textures of violence or tenderness are shown to add up to a “form of knowledge in the traffic between entities,” a politics of matter and relation to the more-than-human world (19). THE LAST CIGARETTE Daniel Eltringham","PeriodicalId":42834,"journal":{"name":"FILM CRITICISM","volume":"3 1","pages":"313 - 318"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FILM CRITICISM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13110/criticism.63.3.0313","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
Abstract
Criticism 63.3_07_Eltringham.indd Page 313 12/07/21 6:09 pm Criticism Summer 2021, Vol. 63, No. 3, pp. 313–318. ISSN 0011-1589. doi: 10.13110/criticism.63.3.0313 © 2021 by Wayne State University Press, Detroit, Michigan 48201-1309 As a temporal category “the Anthropocene” makes a fundamental claim about periodicity: the geological age of the anthropos is upon us, or “we” have ushered it in, and it is categorically distinct from what came before (geologically, the Holocene). Subjectively, this idea induces the nauseous vertigo of living as subjects in two radically incommensurate times at once: what Anne-Lise François calls “the simultaneity of speed and slow time. . . . To listen to the geologists, the Anthropocene would be humanity’s last cigarette, a name for the fast consumption of deep time.” Such a disjunctive “poetics of thick time,” to name one of the central modes David Farrier identifies in Anthropocene Poetics, is corralled in a particularly persistent way, he argues, by “lyric’s capacity to pull multiple temporalities and scales within a single frame” (9). One of the many virtues of this book is the way in which Farrier’s sustained focus on the viscous “now” of lyric address enables his close-reading practice to trespass the bounds of the words on the page, in order to access deep times that he reveals to be snagged in the trellises of stanzaic structure. Throughout, these textures of violence or tenderness are shown to add up to a “form of knowledge in the traffic between entities,” a politics of matter and relation to the more-than-human world (19). THE LAST CIGARETTE Daniel Eltringham
最后一支烟
63.3 _07_eltringham批评。第313页21年7月12日下午6:09批评夏季2021,卷63,第3号,第313 - 318页。ISSN 0011 - 1589。作为一个时间范畴,“人类世”提出了一个关于周期性的基本主张:人类的地质时代就在我们面前,或者“我们”已经迎来了它,它与之前的时代(地质学上,全新世)截然不同。主观上,这种想法引起了作为主体同时生活在两个根本不相称的时代的令人作呕的眩晕:安妮-丽丝·弗朗索瓦称之为“快时间和慢时间的同时性. . . .”听地质学家的话,人类世将是人类的最后一支烟,是一个快速消耗深层时间的名字。”这种分离的“厚重时间的诗学”,大卫·法里尔(David Farrier)在《人类世诗学》(Anthropocene Poetics)中指出的一种中心模式,以一种特别持久的方式被包围,他认为,“抒情的能力将多个时间和尺度拉进一个单一的框架”(9)。这本书的众多优点之一是,法里尔持续关注抒情的粘性“现在”,使他的近距离阅读实践超越了页面上文字的界限。为了深入时代,他揭示了自己被困在stanzaic结构的格子里。自始至终,这些暴力或温柔的纹理被显示为一种“实体之间交通中的知识形式”,一种物质政治以及与超越人类的世界的关系(19)。最后一根烟丹尼尔·埃尔特林汉姆
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
来源期刊
期刊介绍:
Film Criticism is a peer-reviewed, online publication whose aim is to bring together scholarship in the field of cinema and media studies in order to present the finest work in this area, foregrounding textual criticism as a primary value. Our readership is academic, although we strive to publish material that is both accessible to undergraduates and engaging to established scholars. With over 40 years of continuous publication, Film Criticism is the third oldest academic film journal in the United States. We have published work by such international scholars as Dudley Andrew, David Bordwell, David Cook, Andrew Horton, Ann Kaplan, Marcia Landy, Peter Lehman, Janet Staiger, and Robin Wood. Equally important, FC continues to present work from emerging generations of film and media scholars representing multiple critical, cultural and theoretical perspectives. Film Criticism is an open access academic journal that allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, and link to the full texts of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose except where otherwise noted.