Predicting Healthy Eating: Conscientiousness versus the Health Belief Model

Q4 Psychology
Claudia Dumitrescu, C. Iacob
{"title":"Predicting Healthy Eating: Conscientiousness versus the Health Belief Model","authors":"Claudia Dumitrescu, C. Iacob","doi":"10.24913/rjap.23.1.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present paper aimed to investigate the incremental validity of conscientiousness over the Health Belief Model (i.e., HBM) components in predicting students' eating habits. Using a non-experimental, longitudinal design, data from 200 Romanian students (181 females; Mage = 20.75, SDage = 3.89) were initially collected (T1). After one month (T2), the second wave of data was received from 150 students. Hierarchical regression results with eating habits from T2 as a criterion showed that self-efficacy for healthy eating was the only significant predictor for students' eating habits (β = .45, t(145) = 5.41, p < .01). Self-efficacy alone explained 27% of the variance in eating habits. Contrary to expectations, the perceived benefits of healthy eating did not correlate with the participants' eating habits. Conscientiousness did not bring additional predictive value, besides the HBM components (β = .03 , t(145) = .38, p = .70 ). These results reinforce the value of the HBM as a frame of reference for explaining eating habits in young people. From a practical standpoint, the findings suggest the need to strengthen self-efficacy in youth, which, in turn, can help them develop healthier eating habits. Limitations and other implications were further discussed.","PeriodicalId":36595,"journal":{"name":"Romanian Journal of Applied Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian Journal of Applied Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24913/rjap.23.1.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The present paper aimed to investigate the incremental validity of conscientiousness over the Health Belief Model (i.e., HBM) components in predicting students' eating habits. Using a non-experimental, longitudinal design, data from 200 Romanian students (181 females; Mage = 20.75, SDage = 3.89) were initially collected (T1). After one month (T2), the second wave of data was received from 150 students. Hierarchical regression results with eating habits from T2 as a criterion showed that self-efficacy for healthy eating was the only significant predictor for students' eating habits (β = .45, t(145) = 5.41, p < .01). Self-efficacy alone explained 27% of the variance in eating habits. Contrary to expectations, the perceived benefits of healthy eating did not correlate with the participants' eating habits. Conscientiousness did not bring additional predictive value, besides the HBM components (β = .03 , t(145) = .38, p = .70 ). These results reinforce the value of the HBM as a frame of reference for explaining eating habits in young people. From a practical standpoint, the findings suggest the need to strengthen self-efficacy in youth, which, in turn, can help them develop healthier eating habits. Limitations and other implications were further discussed.
预测健康饮食:尽责性与健康信念模型
本研究旨在探讨尽责性对健康信念模型(即HBM)成分预测学生饮食习惯的增量效度。采用非实验的纵向设计,数据来自200名罗马尼亚学生(181名女性;Mage = 20.75, SDage = 3.89)初始采集(T1)。一个月后(T2),我们收到了来自150名学生的第二波数据。以T2饮食习惯为标准的层次回归结果显示,健康饮食自我效能感是学生饮食习惯的唯一显著预测因子(β = 0.45, t(145) = 5.41, p < 0.01)。仅自我效能就解释了27%的饮食习惯差异。与预期相反,健康饮食的好处与参与者的饮食习惯无关。责任心不具有额外的预测价值,除了HBM成分(β = 0.03, t(145) = 0.38, p = 0.70)。这些结果强化了HBM作为解释年轻人饮食习惯参考框架的价值。从实际的角度来看,研究结果表明,需要加强年轻人的自我效能感,这反过来又可以帮助他们养成更健康的饮食习惯。进一步讨论了局限性和其他影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Romanian Journal of Applied Psychology
Romanian Journal of Applied Psychology Psychology-Applied Psychology
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信