UX test in the academic information system of vocational higher education

Direstu Amalia, Dwi Cahyono, Virma Septiani, M. Kristiawan
{"title":"UX test in the academic information system of vocational higher education","authors":"Direstu Amalia, Dwi Cahyono, Virma Septiani, M. Kristiawan","doi":"10.29210/021583jpgi0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to evaluate the user experience (UX) of academic information system (SIAKAD) using the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ). Although SIAKAD has been running for two years, user experience testing has not yet been carried out to assess whether this application is sufficient to meet user needs or not. Questionnaires were distributed to all lecturers, administrative units, and cadets and 70 people filled out the survey. The results showed positive values on the scale of attractiveness, clarity, efficiency, accuracy, and stimulation with means > 0,8. The negative values are finding on the novelty scale where the mean is < 0,8 or 0.564. The reliability test showed that five of the six aspects were good with Cronbach-alpha > 0.7, while the UEQ weakness was on the novelty scale with an Alpha score of 0.16. A benchmark study conducts, and results shows a scale of accuracy, attractiveness, and stimulation to get an “Excellent” Product rating. Clarity and efficiency scale reach a “Good” category. Poor rating with “Below Average” obtained by novelty scale. Suggestions for further improvement is to re-evaluate the novelty aspect of SIAKAD with important points that must be considered related to innovation, invention, and creative design.","PeriodicalId":17526,"journal":{"name":"JPGI (Jurnal Penelitian Guru Indonesia)","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JPGI (Jurnal Penelitian Guru Indonesia)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29210/021583jpgi0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the user experience (UX) of academic information system (SIAKAD) using the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ). Although SIAKAD has been running for two years, user experience testing has not yet been carried out to assess whether this application is sufficient to meet user needs or not. Questionnaires were distributed to all lecturers, administrative units, and cadets and 70 people filled out the survey. The results showed positive values on the scale of attractiveness, clarity, efficiency, accuracy, and stimulation with means > 0,8. The negative values are finding on the novelty scale where the mean is < 0,8 or 0.564. The reliability test showed that five of the six aspects were good with Cronbach-alpha > 0.7, while the UEQ weakness was on the novelty scale with an Alpha score of 0.16. A benchmark study conducts, and results shows a scale of accuracy, attractiveness, and stimulation to get an “Excellent” Product rating. Clarity and efficiency scale reach a “Good” category. Poor rating with “Below Average” obtained by novelty scale. Suggestions for further improvement is to re-evaluate the novelty aspect of SIAKAD with important points that must be considered related to innovation, invention, and creative design.
高职院校学术信息系统中的UX测试
本研究的目的是使用用户体验问卷(UEQ)来评估学术信息系统(SIAKAD)的用户体验(UX)。虽然SIAKAD已经运行了两年,但用户体验测试尚未进行,以评估该应用程序是否足以满足用户需求。问卷发放给所有讲师、行政单位和学员,共有70人填写了调查问卷。结果在吸引力、清晰度、效率、准确性和刺激的量表上均为正值,平均值为> 0,8。在平均值< 0,8或0.564的新颖性尺度上发现负值。信度检验显示,6个方面中有5个方面表现良好,Cronbach-alpha评分为0.7,而UEQ的弱点在新颖性量表上,Alpha评分为0.16。进行基准研究,结果显示了准确性,吸引力和刺激程度,以获得“优秀”产品评级。清晰度和效率量表达到“良好”类别。新颖性评分为“低于平均水平”。进一步改进的建议是重新评估SIAKAD的新颖性方面,必须考虑与创新,发明和创意设计相关的要点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信