Labour market fluctuations: An RBC model for emerging countries

IF 2 Q2 ECONOMICS
Sevgi Coşkun
{"title":"Labour market fluctuations: An RBC model for emerging countries","authors":"Sevgi Coşkun","doi":"10.1016/j.cbrev.2019.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper, we examine the labour market properties of business cycle fluctuations for a group of 15 emerging market economies (EMEs) and the US using annual data from 1970 to 2013. We find that on average, the hours worked and employment volatility (relative to output volatility) are lower, while the volatility of productivity and wages are 2–3 times higher in EMEs compared to the US. We then assess the performance of a standard RBC model and an augmented RBC model with capacity utilization, investment adjustment cost and indivisible labour with temporary and permanent productivity shocks to explain labour market facts observed in the data. We find that these models fail to explain labour market fluctuations in the business cycles of these countries, but the model with investment adjustment cost improves the performance of relative volatility of wages and hours, as well as the cyclicality of hours, compared to the standard RBC model. Lastly, we investigate the cyclical properties of the labour wedge and find that the total labour wedge (relative to output volatility) is more volatile over the business cycle in emerging economies (1.72) compared to the US (0.95). Further, fluctuations in the total labour wedge reflect the ones in the household component rather than the firm component of the wedge in EMEs and the US.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43998,"journal":{"name":"Central Bank Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cbrev.2019.11.002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central Bank Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1303070119300873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we examine the labour market properties of business cycle fluctuations for a group of 15 emerging market economies (EMEs) and the US using annual data from 1970 to 2013. We find that on average, the hours worked and employment volatility (relative to output volatility) are lower, while the volatility of productivity and wages are 2–3 times higher in EMEs compared to the US. We then assess the performance of a standard RBC model and an augmented RBC model with capacity utilization, investment adjustment cost and indivisible labour with temporary and permanent productivity shocks to explain labour market facts observed in the data. We find that these models fail to explain labour market fluctuations in the business cycles of these countries, but the model with investment adjustment cost improves the performance of relative volatility of wages and hours, as well as the cyclicality of hours, compared to the standard RBC model. Lastly, we investigate the cyclical properties of the labour wedge and find that the total labour wedge (relative to output volatility) is more volatile over the business cycle in emerging economies (1.72) compared to the US (0.95). Further, fluctuations in the total labour wedge reflect the ones in the household component rather than the firm component of the wedge in EMEs and the US.

劳动力市场波动:新兴国家的RBC模型
在本文中,我们使用1970年至2013年的年度数据,研究了15个新兴市场经济体(eme)和美国的商业周期波动的劳动力市场属性。我们发现,平均而言,新兴市场国家的工作时间和就业波动性(相对于产出波动性)较低,而生产率和工资的波动性是美国的2-3倍。然后,我们评估了标准RBC模型和增强RBC模型的性能,其中包括产能利用率、投资调整成本和不可分割劳动力,以及暂时性和永久性生产率冲击,以解释数据中观察到的劳动力市场事实。我们发现这些模型无法解释这些国家商业周期中的劳动力市场波动,但与标准RBC模型相比,具有投资调整成本的模型改善了工资和工时的相对波动性以及工时的周期性。最后,我们研究了劳动力楔子的周期性特性,发现新兴经济体的总劳动力楔子(相对于产出波动性)在商业周期中的波动性(1.72)比美国(0.95)更大。此外,在新兴市场经济体和美国,总劳动力楔子的波动反映的是家庭部分的波动,而不是楔子中企业部分的波动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Central Bank Review
Central Bank Review ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信