What really matters mobility of middle-aged and older adults: low muscle mass or obesity?

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 PHYSIOLOGY
Chiao-Nan Chen, Kuo-Jen Hsu, Shu-Chen Chen, Kuei-Yu Chien
{"title":"What really matters mobility of middle-aged and older adults: low muscle mass or obesity?","authors":"Chiao-Nan Chen, Kuo-Jen Hsu, Shu-Chen Chen, Kuei-Yu Chien","doi":"10.1152/physiol.2023.38.s1.5730639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study objective: This study explored which body size–adjusted skeletal muscle indices (SMI) has a better correlation with mobility and cardiometabolic health. Additionally, the roles of low muscle mass and obesity in the mobility and cardiometabolic health of individuals were identified. We hypothesized that body mass index (BMI)-or body weight (Wt)-adjusted SMI had a better correlation with mobility in middle-aged and older adults with obesity than did body height (Ht)-adjusted SMI. Methods: 427 community-dwelling middle-aged and older adults (age: 66.0±9.0 years) underwent assessments of body composition (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and waist circumference [WC]), grip strength, and mobility (timed up-and-go test and chair stand test). WC was used as a surrogate for obesity. Chi-square test and one-way analysis of variance were used to compare grip strength, mobility, and cardiometabolic health among individuals with normal body composition (N), only low muscle mass (S), only obesity (O), and low muscle mass plus obesity (SO). Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to examine the correlation between muscle strength/mobility and different body size–adjusted SMI. Regression models were used to examine the factors independently associated with muscle strength, mobility, and cardiometabolic health. The significance level was set at α<0.05. Results: The O group, but not the S group, had poorer mobility than the N group, regardless of the SMI used to define low muscle mass. The O and SO groups had a higher prevalence of cardiometabolic diseases. The relationship between muscle mass and mobility existed in individuals with obesity, but not in individuals without obesity. After adjusting for age, sex, and WC, ASM/BMI was the only SMI that was correlated with grip strength. Similarly, only ASM/BMI was positively correlated with performance on the timed up-and-go test in the population with obesity (p<0.05). When age and sex were controlled, WC, but not SMI (regardless of adjusting for Ht, Wt, or BMI), was associated with mobility and cardiometabolic health. Conclusion: BMI-adjusted SMI had a better correlation with mobility in middle-aged and older adults with obesity than did Ht- and Wt-adjusted SMI. Obesity plays a more independent role in mobility and cardiometabolic health than low muscle mass in middle-aged and older adults. This study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2023 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.","PeriodicalId":49694,"journal":{"name":"Physiology","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/physiol.2023.38.s1.5730639","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objective: This study explored which body size–adjusted skeletal muscle indices (SMI) has a better correlation with mobility and cardiometabolic health. Additionally, the roles of low muscle mass and obesity in the mobility and cardiometabolic health of individuals were identified. We hypothesized that body mass index (BMI)-or body weight (Wt)-adjusted SMI had a better correlation with mobility in middle-aged and older adults with obesity than did body height (Ht)-adjusted SMI. Methods: 427 community-dwelling middle-aged and older adults (age: 66.0±9.0 years) underwent assessments of body composition (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and waist circumference [WC]), grip strength, and mobility (timed up-and-go test and chair stand test). WC was used as a surrogate for obesity. Chi-square test and one-way analysis of variance were used to compare grip strength, mobility, and cardiometabolic health among individuals with normal body composition (N), only low muscle mass (S), only obesity (O), and low muscle mass plus obesity (SO). Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to examine the correlation between muscle strength/mobility and different body size–adjusted SMI. Regression models were used to examine the factors independently associated with muscle strength, mobility, and cardiometabolic health. The significance level was set at α<0.05. Results: The O group, but not the S group, had poorer mobility than the N group, regardless of the SMI used to define low muscle mass. The O and SO groups had a higher prevalence of cardiometabolic diseases. The relationship between muscle mass and mobility existed in individuals with obesity, but not in individuals without obesity. After adjusting for age, sex, and WC, ASM/BMI was the only SMI that was correlated with grip strength. Similarly, only ASM/BMI was positively correlated with performance on the timed up-and-go test in the population with obesity (p<0.05). When age and sex were controlled, WC, but not SMI (regardless of adjusting for Ht, Wt, or BMI), was associated with mobility and cardiometabolic health. Conclusion: BMI-adjusted SMI had a better correlation with mobility in middle-aged and older adults with obesity than did Ht- and Wt-adjusted SMI. Obesity plays a more independent role in mobility and cardiometabolic health than low muscle mass in middle-aged and older adults. This study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2023 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.
到底是什么影响了中老年人的运动能力:肌肉量低还是肥胖?
研究目的:探讨哪种体型调整骨骼肌指数(SMI)与运动能力和心脏代谢健康有更好的相关性。此外,还确定了低肌肉质量和肥胖在个体运动和心脏代谢健康中的作用。我们假设体重指数(BMI)或体重(Wt)调整的SMI与中老年肥胖患者的活动能力的相关性优于身高(Ht)调整的SMI。方法:对427名居住在社区的中老年人(年龄:66.0±9.0岁)进行了身体组成(双能x线吸收仪和腰围[WC])、握力和活动能力(定时站起和站立测试)的评估。WC被用来代替肥胖。采用卡方检验和单因素方差分析比较正常身体成分(N)、低肌肉量(S)、肥胖(O)和低肌肉量加肥胖(SO)个体的握力、活动能力和心脏代谢健康状况。使用Pearson相关系数来检验肌肉力量/活动性与不同体型调整的SMI之间的相关性。回归模型用于检查与肌肉力量、活动能力和心脏代谢健康相关的独立因素。显著性水平设为α<0.05。结果:无论用SMI来定义低肌肉量,O组的活动能力比N组差,而S组则没有。O组和SO组有较高的心脏代谢疾病患病率。肌肉质量与活动能力之间的关系存在于肥胖个体中,而不存在于肥胖个体中。在调整了年龄、性别和腰围后,ASM/BMI是唯一与握力相关的SMI。同样,在肥胖人群中,只有ASM/BMI与计时起跑测试的表现呈正相关(p<0.05)。当控制年龄和性别时,WC与运动能力和心脏代谢健康相关,而非SMI(不考虑Ht、Wt或BMI)。结论:与Ht和wt调整的SMI相比,bmi调整的SMI与中老年肥胖患者的活动能力有更好的相关性。在中老年人中,肥胖在运动能力和心脏代谢健康方面的作用比低肌肉量更独立。这是在2023年美国生理学峰会上发表的全文摘要,仅以HTML格式提供。此摘要没有附加版本或附加内容。生理学没有参与同行评议过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiology
Physiology 医学-生理学
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Physiology journal features meticulously crafted review articles penned by esteemed leaders in their respective fields. These articles undergo rigorous peer review and showcase the forefront of cutting-edge advances across various domains of physiology. Our Editorial Board, comprised of distinguished leaders in the broad spectrum of physiology, convenes annually to deliberate and recommend pioneering topics for review articles, as well as select the most suitable scientists to author these articles. Join us in exploring the forefront of physiological research and innovation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信