Left ventricular diastolic function in adult patients with an atrial septal defect and its age-dependent changes over time after transcatheter closure of the defect

I. Kovalchuk, I. R. Rafaeli, V. A. Kryukov, A. Rogatova, A. V. Azarov, S. A. Kurnosov, D. G. Ioseliani
{"title":"Left ventricular diastolic function in adult patients with an atrial septal defect and its age-dependent changes over time after transcatheter closure of the defect","authors":"I. Kovalchuk, I. R. Rafaeli, V. A. Kryukov, A. Rogatova, A. V. Azarov, S. A. Kurnosov, D. G. Ioseliani","doi":"10.18786/2072-0505-2023-51-008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There are no echocardiographic (echoCG) criteria to predict whether adult patients with an atrial septal defect (ASD) will develop post-procedural left ventricular (LV) failure after the defect closure. \nAim: To evaluate the LV diastolic function before and after the intervention in ASD patients depending on their age and, based on this, to identify potential echoCG risk factors for the development of acute heart failure immediately after the ASD closure. \nMaterials and methods: This retrospective study included 69 patients with the mean age of 44.2 14.5 years and 57 (82.6%) being women. The patients were divided into 2 age groups: group 1 included 39 (56.5%) patients aged 18 to 49 years (mean SD, 35.4 9.4 years) and group 2, 30 (43.5%) patients aged 50 to 74 years (mean SD, 60.1 6.1 years). The characteristics of the ASD, heart chambers and LV diastolic function were assessed with transthoracic and transesophageal echoCG. The indexed indicators of the left atrial (LA) and LV volumes were measured before the intervention and in the postoperative period and compared. LV diastolic function was assessed by the e lateral (determined by tissue Doppler imaging, TDI) and E/e ratio (reference values 10 cm/s and 8, respectively). \nResults: The indexed LA volume at baseline in the second group was slightly higher than in the first one (27.6 9.8 ml/m2 and 25.4 7.1 ml/m2; p = 0.311), whereas there was no between-group difference in the baseline indexed LV volume parameters (41.8 7.9 ml/m2 and 42.4 8.6 ml/m2, respectively; p = 0.768). Immediately after the closure of the ASD, LV diastolic function deteriorated. In the patients below 50 years of age, this difference was non-significant, despite significant changes in the E/e values (from 7.6 3.6 to 9.9 4.1; p = 0.012). In the second age group, this parameter increased significantly (from 9.2 5.7 to 13.1 4.3, respectively; p = 0.005). The TDI index (e lateral) decreased in both groups: in the group 1, from 11.9 2.5 to 9.1 2.2 (p 0.001) and in the group 2, from 9.3 3.6 to 7.9 1.6 (p = 0.061). Two patients of the elderly group, in whom sings of LV failure were identified immediately after the defect closure, by echoCG showed the lowest TDI values (е lateral) (7.8 and 8.0 cm/sec before closure and 6.4 and 7.0 cm/sec thereafter), as well as the highest values E/e before closure (13.4 and 13.1, respectively). In the long-term (12.5 6.5 months on average), the E/e index decreased in both age groups, compared to that in the early postoperative period, approaching the preoperative parameters (group 50 years of age: 7.6 3.6 9.9 4.1 8.7 4.8, group 50 years of age, 9.2 5.7 13.1 4.3 10.8 5.6). The TDI e indicators also shifted close to their initial values, increasing from 9.1 2.2 to 11.6 1.9 in the group 50 years of age and from 7.9 1.6 to 8.9 2.8 in the group 50 years of age. In the long-term, the LA volume index in both groups was unchanged, compared to its baseline values. The indexed LV end diastolic volume and end diastolic diameter increased significantly at one year after the ASD closure in both groups; however, they did not fall outside the reference ranges, and the LV systolic function indicators remained at the same level. \nConclusion: LA volumes and LV function demonstrated the expected positive remodeling after the transcatheter ASD closure. Potential echoCG risk factors for the development of acute heart failure immediately after the ASD closure were identified. These were low baseline rates of early diastolic velocity of the mitral ring (TDI e lateral) of less than 8.0 cm/sec and high LV filling pressure (E/e) of more than 13 in the patients with ASD.","PeriodicalId":7638,"journal":{"name":"Almanac of Clinical Medicine","volume":"370 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Almanac of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18786/2072-0505-2023-51-008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There are no echocardiographic (echoCG) criteria to predict whether adult patients with an atrial septal defect (ASD) will develop post-procedural left ventricular (LV) failure after the defect closure. Aim: To evaluate the LV diastolic function before and after the intervention in ASD patients depending on their age and, based on this, to identify potential echoCG risk factors for the development of acute heart failure immediately after the ASD closure. Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 69 patients with the mean age of 44.2 14.5 years and 57 (82.6%) being women. The patients were divided into 2 age groups: group 1 included 39 (56.5%) patients aged 18 to 49 years (mean SD, 35.4 9.4 years) and group 2, 30 (43.5%) patients aged 50 to 74 years (mean SD, 60.1 6.1 years). The characteristics of the ASD, heart chambers and LV diastolic function were assessed with transthoracic and transesophageal echoCG. The indexed indicators of the left atrial (LA) and LV volumes were measured before the intervention and in the postoperative period and compared. LV diastolic function was assessed by the e lateral (determined by tissue Doppler imaging, TDI) and E/e ratio (reference values 10 cm/s and 8, respectively). Results: The indexed LA volume at baseline in the second group was slightly higher than in the first one (27.6 9.8 ml/m2 and 25.4 7.1 ml/m2; p = 0.311), whereas there was no between-group difference in the baseline indexed LV volume parameters (41.8 7.9 ml/m2 and 42.4 8.6 ml/m2, respectively; p = 0.768). Immediately after the closure of the ASD, LV diastolic function deteriorated. In the patients below 50 years of age, this difference was non-significant, despite significant changes in the E/e values (from 7.6 3.6 to 9.9 4.1; p = 0.012). In the second age group, this parameter increased significantly (from 9.2 5.7 to 13.1 4.3, respectively; p = 0.005). The TDI index (e lateral) decreased in both groups: in the group 1, from 11.9 2.5 to 9.1 2.2 (p 0.001) and in the group 2, from 9.3 3.6 to 7.9 1.6 (p = 0.061). Two patients of the elderly group, in whom sings of LV failure were identified immediately after the defect closure, by echoCG showed the lowest TDI values (е lateral) (7.8 and 8.0 cm/sec before closure and 6.4 and 7.0 cm/sec thereafter), as well as the highest values E/e before closure (13.4 and 13.1, respectively). In the long-term (12.5 6.5 months on average), the E/e index decreased in both age groups, compared to that in the early postoperative period, approaching the preoperative parameters (group 50 years of age: 7.6 3.6 9.9 4.1 8.7 4.8, group 50 years of age, 9.2 5.7 13.1 4.3 10.8 5.6). The TDI e indicators also shifted close to their initial values, increasing from 9.1 2.2 to 11.6 1.9 in the group 50 years of age and from 7.9 1.6 to 8.9 2.8 in the group 50 years of age. In the long-term, the LA volume index in both groups was unchanged, compared to its baseline values. The indexed LV end diastolic volume and end diastolic diameter increased significantly at one year after the ASD closure in both groups; however, they did not fall outside the reference ranges, and the LV systolic function indicators remained at the same level. Conclusion: LA volumes and LV function demonstrated the expected positive remodeling after the transcatheter ASD closure. Potential echoCG risk factors for the development of acute heart failure immediately after the ASD closure were identified. These were low baseline rates of early diastolic velocity of the mitral ring (TDI e lateral) of less than 8.0 cm/sec and high LV filling pressure (E/e) of more than 13 in the patients with ASD.
房间隔缺损的成年患者左室舒张功能及其经导管关闭缺损后随时间的年龄依赖性变化
背景:目前还没有超声心动图(echoCG)标准来预测房间隔缺损(ASD)的成年患者在缺损关闭后是否会发生术后左心室(LV)衰竭。目的:评价不同年龄ASD患者干预前后左室舒张功能,并以此为基础,识别ASD闭锁后立即发生急性心力衰竭的潜在超声心动图危险因素。材料和方法:本回顾性研究纳入69例患者,平均年龄44.2 ~ 14.5岁,女性57例(82.6%)。患者分为2个年龄组:1组18 ~ 49岁39例(56.5%),平均SD为35.4 9.4岁;2组50 ~ 74岁30例(43.5%),平均SD为60.1 6.1岁。应用经胸、经食管超声心动图评估ASD特征、心室及左室舒张功能。测量干预前和术后左房(LA)、左室容积指标,并进行比较。左室舒张功能通过e侧位(通过组织多普勒成像,TDI确定)和e /e比值(参考值分别为10 cm/s和8 cm/s)评估。结果:第二组基线时LA指数体积略高于第一组(27.6 9.8 ml/m2和25.4 7.1 ml/m2;p = 0.311),而基线指标左室容积参数组间无差异(分别为41.8 7.9 ml/m2和42.4 8.6 ml/m2;P = 0.768)。ASD关闭后,左室舒张功能立即恶化。在50岁以下的患者中,尽管E/ E值有显著变化(从7.6 3.6到9.9 4.1;P = 0.012)。在第二年龄组,该参数显著增加(分别从9.2 5.7增加到13.1 4.3;P = 0.005)。两组TDI指数(e侧)均下降:组1从11.9 2.5降至9.1 2.2 (p 0.001),组2从9.3 3.6降至7.9 1.6 (p = 0.061)。2例老年组患者在缺损关闭后立即发现左室衰竭,超声心动图显示TDI值(侧位)最低(关闭前7.8和8.0 cm/sec,关闭后6.4和7.0 cm/sec),关闭前E/ E值最高(分别为13.4和13.1)。长期(平均12.5 6.5个月),两组E/ E指数均较术后早期下降,接近术前参数(50岁组:7.6 3.6 9.9 4.1 8.7 4.8,50岁组:9.2 5.7 13.1 4.3 10.8 5.6)。TDI e指标也向初始值靠拢,50岁组从9.1 2.2上升到11.6 1.9,50岁组从7.9 1.6上升到8.9 2.8。长期来看,两组的LA容积指数与其基线值相比没有变化。两组患者在ASD闭合后1年左室舒张末期容积和舒张末期内径指数均显著升高;但均未超出参考范围,左室收缩功能指标维持在同一水平。结论:经导管ASD闭合后左室容积和左室功能表现出预期的阳性重构。确定ASD关闭后立即发生急性心力衰竭的潜在超声心动图危险因素。ASD患者的早期二尖瓣舒张速度(TDI)低于8.0 cm/sec,左室充盈压力(e /e)高于13。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信