Trans-Action: A Processual and Relational Approach to Organizations

Philippe Lorino
{"title":"Trans-Action: A Processual and Relational Approach to Organizations","authors":"Philippe Lorino","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198753216.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A theoretical problem has haunted organization studies for decades: How can we move from the “micro” level of individual sense-making and action to the “macro” level of organizational sense-making and action? The very dichotomy micro–macro refers to a dualist opposition between “individual” and “organizational” which has been criticized as static and irrelevant. This critique has prompted many organization scholars to look for a more relational and dynamic perspective, abandoning the traditional view of organizations as structures and replacing it with a dynamic view of organizations as organizing processes that continuously adapt the relationships between actors, artefacts and situations. But the theoretical frameworks available to study organizations must then be thoroughly revised. This chapter examines the potential contribution of the pragmatist concept of trans-action to a processual and relational approach to organizations. It applies this approach to the analysis of a merger between two large retailers and its concrete impact on ordinary logistic tasks, for example loading and unloading pallets. Controversies do not only lead to new work methods, but also to an emergent and radical redefinition of the situation and of its participating entities, including human actors. Apart from a deep renewal of organizational theory, the trans-actional framework supports research methods based on exploratory inquiries that involve field actors and researchers as co-inquirers.","PeriodicalId":14746,"journal":{"name":"John Dewey and the Notion of Trans-action","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"John Dewey and the Notion of Trans-action","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198753216.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A theoretical problem has haunted organization studies for decades: How can we move from the “micro” level of individual sense-making and action to the “macro” level of organizational sense-making and action? The very dichotomy micro–macro refers to a dualist opposition between “individual” and “organizational” which has been criticized as static and irrelevant. This critique has prompted many organization scholars to look for a more relational and dynamic perspective, abandoning the traditional view of organizations as structures and replacing it with a dynamic view of organizations as organizing processes that continuously adapt the relationships between actors, artefacts and situations. But the theoretical frameworks available to study organizations must then be thoroughly revised. This chapter examines the potential contribution of the pragmatist concept of trans-action to a processual and relational approach to organizations. It applies this approach to the analysis of a merger between two large retailers and its concrete impact on ordinary logistic tasks, for example loading and unloading pallets. Controversies do not only lead to new work methods, but also to an emergent and radical redefinition of the situation and of its participating entities, including human actors. Apart from a deep renewal of organizational theory, the trans-actional framework supports research methods based on exploratory inquiries that involve field actors and researchers as co-inquirers.
交易-行动:组织的过程和关系方法
一个理论问题困扰了组织研究几十年:我们如何从个人的“微观”层面的意义制定和行动转移到组织的“宏观”层面的意义制定和行动?微观和宏观的二分法是指“个人”和“组织”之间的二元对立,这种对立被批评为静态的和不相关的。这种批评促使许多组织学者寻找一种更具关联性和动态性的观点,放弃将组织视为结构的传统观点,代之以一种将组织视为组织过程的动态观点,这种组织过程不断地适应行动者、人工制品和情况之间的关系。但是,用于研究组织的理论框架必须彻底修改。本章探讨了实用主义交易概念对组织过程和关系方法的潜在贡献。它将这种方法应用于分析两家大型零售商之间的合并及其对普通物流任务(例如装卸托盘)的具体影响。争议不仅导致新的工作方法,而且还导致对局势及其参与实体(包括人类行动者)的紧急和彻底的重新定义。除了组织理论的深度更新之外,交易-行为框架还支持基于探索性调查的研究方法,该研究方法涉及领域参与者和研究人员作为共同调查者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信