Overcoming Barriers: The Local and the Innovative Dimensions of Inclusive Socio-Educational Practices

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Fátima Antunes, J. Lúcio
{"title":"Overcoming Barriers: The Local and the Innovative Dimensions of Inclusive Socio-Educational Practices","authors":"Fátima Antunes, J. Lúcio","doi":"10.17583/REMIE.2019.4200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses some results of a broader research, focusing on a set of eleven socio-educational practices aiming to overcome school failure and dropout, developed in Portugal, giving particular attention to the local and innovative dimensions. This research aims to understand the point of view of the several actors involved, about which factors, processes and relationships contribute the most to building such practices. Data was gathered through documental analysis and semi-structured interviews with those (institutionally) responsible for each practice under study, and was analysed using two instruments. From the point of view of the people responsible, the practices that contribute the most to overcoming school failure and dropout fall into one of four categories: Study Support (4 Practices), Student Grouping (3), Mediation (3) and Pedagogical Differentiation (1). Some practices mobilise resources; others interfere with learning and life contexts, in order to confront institutional, situational and dispositional barriers to participation and learning. Those practices seem to have an impact on school-family communication. Formal schooling, as well as the socio-cultural inclusion of youth from disadvantaged backgrounds, are seen as relevant; yet, we can observe a somewhat fragile involvement of families and communities in practices aimed at promoting their youth’s educational success.","PeriodicalId":42901,"journal":{"name":"REMIE-Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REMIE-Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17583/REMIE.2019.4200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This paper discusses some results of a broader research, focusing on a set of eleven socio-educational practices aiming to overcome school failure and dropout, developed in Portugal, giving particular attention to the local and innovative dimensions. This research aims to understand the point of view of the several actors involved, about which factors, processes and relationships contribute the most to building such practices. Data was gathered through documental analysis and semi-structured interviews with those (institutionally) responsible for each practice under study, and was analysed using two instruments. From the point of view of the people responsible, the practices that contribute the most to overcoming school failure and dropout fall into one of four categories: Study Support (4 Practices), Student Grouping (3), Mediation (3) and Pedagogical Differentiation (1). Some practices mobilise resources; others interfere with learning and life contexts, in order to confront institutional, situational and dispositional barriers to participation and learning. Those practices seem to have an impact on school-family communication. Formal schooling, as well as the socio-cultural inclusion of youth from disadvantaged backgrounds, are seen as relevant; yet, we can observe a somewhat fragile involvement of families and communities in practices aimed at promoting their youth’s educational success.
克服障碍:包容性社会教育实践的地方和创新维度
本文讨论了一项更广泛的研究的一些结果,重点是在葡萄牙开发的一套旨在克服学业失败和辍学的11个社会教育实践,特别关注当地和创新方面。这项研究的目的是了解几个参与者的观点,关于哪些因素、过程和关系对建立这样的实践贡献最大。通过文献分析和与负责研究中的每个实践的(机构)人员的半结构化访谈收集数据,并使用两种工具进行分析。从负责人的角度来看,对克服学业失败和辍学贡献最大的做法可分为四类:学习支持(4种做法)、学生分组(3种做法)、调解(3种做法)和教学差异化(1种做法)。另一些人干预学习和生活环境,以面对参与和学习的制度、情境和性格障碍。这些做法似乎对学校与家庭的沟通产生了影响。正规学校教育以及弱势背景青年的社会文化融入被认为是相关的;然而,我们可以观察到,家庭和社区在促进青少年教育成功的实践中多少有些脆弱的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
5
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信