Portare Aldilà? Erik Peterson e la critica della teologia politica di C. Schmitt

Q4 Arts and Humanities
G. Zamagni
{"title":"Portare Aldilà? Erik Peterson e la critica della teologia politica di C. Schmitt","authors":"G. Zamagni","doi":"10.6092/ISSN.2421-4124/5170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his essay, the author analyses Erik Peterson’s early work, more closely The Monotheism as Political Problem, to try to understand more accurately his critic to Carl Schmitt’s Political Theology. This entails also a reconsideration of Peterson’s Theological Tractates (recently published in english by Michael J. Hollerich): their solid and acknowledged philological and historical grounding did not impede a strong stance towards their times (i.e. the mid-30s in Germany), and shows the use of tools nonetheless – such as that of Ubertragung (transfer) – which are relevant within the current debate on Political Theology","PeriodicalId":36096,"journal":{"name":"Montesquieu.it","volume":"66 1","pages":"191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Montesquieu.it","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6092/ISSN.2421-4124/5170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In his essay, the author analyses Erik Peterson’s early work, more closely The Monotheism as Political Problem, to try to understand more accurately his critic to Carl Schmitt’s Political Theology. This entails also a reconsideration of Peterson’s Theological Tractates (recently published in english by Michael J. Hollerich): their solid and acknowledged philological and historical grounding did not impede a strong stance towards their times (i.e. the mid-30s in Germany), and shows the use of tools nonetheless – such as that of Ubertragung (transfer) – which are relevant within the current debate on Political Theology
除了?埃里克·彼得森和C·施密特的政治神学评论家
在本文中,作者分析了埃里克·彼得森的早期作品《作为政治问题的一神教》,试图更准确地理解他对卡尔·施密特的《政治神学》的批判。这也需要重新考虑彼得森的《神学讲义》(最近由迈克尔·j·霍勒里奇出版的英文版):它们坚实而公认的语言学和历史基础并没有阻碍对他们的时代(即德国30年代中期)的强烈立场,并且显示了工具的使用-例如Ubertragung(转移)-这与当前关于政治神学的辩论有关
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Montesquieu.it
Montesquieu.it Arts and Humanities-History
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信