A pilot study to evaluate the influence of implant supported prosthesis framework material on the stress distribution in peri-implant bone in anterior mandible: A three dimensional finite element analysis

Nikita Jaiswal, A. Raut, P. Mishra, Crown
{"title":"A pilot study to evaluate the influence of implant supported prosthesis framework material on the stress distribution in peri-implant bone in anterior mandible: A three dimensional finite element analysis","authors":"Nikita Jaiswal, A. Raut, P. Mishra, Crown","doi":"10.18311/jpfa/2020/25512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Original research. Aims: The aim of the present study to evaluate the effects of prosthetic material on the stress distribution of implant-supported prosthesis in the bone around implants using finite element analysis and to draw a comparison so as to which material causes the least amount of stress on the bone. Settings and Design: In vitro finite element analysis - Comparative study. Methods and Materials: Models of the implants and the mandible were constructed using SOLID WORKS software and then they were transferred to another software ANSYS Work bench for FEA. A four-unit prosthesis was designed in the region of anterior mandible with implants being placed in 32 and 42 regions. The prosthesis was made of different materials in different models, M1 was of made of cobalt chromium framework, M2 was made of Titanium framework, M3 was made of zirconia framework each with layered ceramic. M4 was a monolithic zirconia prosthesis. The values of the Von Mises stresses generated in the implant, superstructure and alveolar bone around were calculated. The total deformation and stress generated in different models were calculated and compared. Statistical analysis used: Von mises Stress Analysis, Unpaired t test. Results: Zirconia and Monolithic zirconia showed comparatively less total deformation and stress levels in peri-implant bone. Titanium prosthesis caused less total deformation and stress distribution as compared to cobalt chromium. Conclusions: The distribution of stress in peri implant bone is evidently dependent on the prosthesis material and different materials cause different amount of deformations as they differ in their clinical properties.","PeriodicalId":77222,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pierre Fauchard Academy (Pierre Fauchard Academy. India Section)","volume":"71 1","pages":"118-130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pierre Fauchard Academy (Pierre Fauchard Academy. India Section)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18311/jpfa/2020/25512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Original research. Aims: The aim of the present study to evaluate the effects of prosthetic material on the stress distribution of implant-supported prosthesis in the bone around implants using finite element analysis and to draw a comparison so as to which material causes the least amount of stress on the bone. Settings and Design: In vitro finite element analysis - Comparative study. Methods and Materials: Models of the implants and the mandible were constructed using SOLID WORKS software and then they were transferred to another software ANSYS Work bench for FEA. A four-unit prosthesis was designed in the region of anterior mandible with implants being placed in 32 and 42 regions. The prosthesis was made of different materials in different models, M1 was of made of cobalt chromium framework, M2 was made of Titanium framework, M3 was made of zirconia framework each with layered ceramic. M4 was a monolithic zirconia prosthesis. The values of the Von Mises stresses generated in the implant, superstructure and alveolar bone around were calculated. The total deformation and stress generated in different models were calculated and compared. Statistical analysis used: Von mises Stress Analysis, Unpaired t test. Results: Zirconia and Monolithic zirconia showed comparatively less total deformation and stress levels in peri-implant bone. Titanium prosthesis caused less total deformation and stress distribution as compared to cobalt chromium. Conclusions: The distribution of stress in peri implant bone is evidently dependent on the prosthesis material and different materials cause different amount of deformations as they differ in their clinical properties.
评估种植体支撑假体框架材料对前下颌种植周骨应力分布影响的初步研究:三维有限元分析
背景:原创性研究。目的:本研究的目的是通过有限元分析来评价不同的假体材料对种植体支撑假体在种植体周围骨内应力分布的影响,并比较哪种材料对骨的应力最小。设置和设计:体外有限元分析-比较研究。方法与材料:采用solidworks软件建立种植体和下颌骨模型,并将模型转移到ANSYS workbench中进行有限元分析。在前下颌骨区域设计了一个四单元的假体,种植体放置在32和42区域。不同型号的假体采用不同的材料,M1为钴铬框架,M2为钛框架,M3为氧化锆框架,各采用层状陶瓷。M4是一个单片氧化锆假体。计算种植体、上部结构和牙槽骨周围产生的Von Mises应力值。计算并比较了不同模型下产生的总变形和总应力。统计分析采用:Von mises应力分析,Unpaired t检验。结果:氧化锆和整体氧化锆在种植体周围骨的总变形和应力水平相对较小。与钴铬假体相比,钛假体引起的总变形和应力分布较小。结论:种植体周围骨的应力分布明显依赖于假体材料,不同材料的临床性能不同,造成的变形量也不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信