Respuestas metabólicas y fisiológicas de tres métodos de entrenamiento de fuerza en mujeres entrenadas

IF 0.3 Q4 SPORT SCIENCES
Daniel Tenerife, Nicollas Arakaki, Diego Santos, Leonardo Enmanuel de Medeiros Lima, E. Miguel, Krom Marsili Guedes, Aexandre Correia Rocha, D. Guedes, Rodrigo Pereira da Silva
{"title":"Respuestas metabólicas y fisiológicas de tres métodos de entrenamiento de fuerza en mujeres entrenadas","authors":"Daniel Tenerife, Nicollas Arakaki, Diego Santos, Leonardo Enmanuel de Medeiros Lima, E. Miguel, Krom Marsili Guedes, Aexandre Correia Rocha, D. Guedes, Rodrigo Pereira da Silva","doi":"10.53820/rpcafd.v8i1.1064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective:Analyze the acute effects of the alternate repeat, bilateral fixed series and unilateral fixed series methods in trained women. Methodology:The research was composed by 10 female individuals with at least 4 years of bodybuilding practice. Each one of them did a 4 days try-out, which the first day evaluate the maximum load, and the other days concluded the alternating regressive repetition (RRA), bilateral fixed series (SFB) and unilateral fixed series (SFU). Total time, repetitions performed, blood lactate, maximum heart rate, pain perception and effort using the Borg and Omni scales were measured. Results: There was a significant difference (p < 0,01) in the repetition between the methods: SFB -41,4 ± 9,40; SFU -79,1 ± 13,3 e RRA -72,0 ± 0,0. And total time RRA with 114 seconds, 77 and 150 seconds difference for SFB and SFU respectively. In the other analyzes, no significant difference was observed between the methods. Conclusion:The present research didn’t find any significant difference in the blood lactate, volume, Borg and Omnis cales between the methods. However, there was a significant difference in the time variation of the alternating regressive repetition method for the others.","PeriodicalId":42012,"journal":{"name":"Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencias de la Actividad Fisica y el Deporte","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencias de la Actividad Fisica y el Deporte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53820/rpcafd.v8i1.1064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective:Analyze the acute effects of the alternate repeat, bilateral fixed series and unilateral fixed series methods in trained women. Methodology:The research was composed by 10 female individuals with at least 4 years of bodybuilding practice. Each one of them did a 4 days try-out, which the first day evaluate the maximum load, and the other days concluded the alternating regressive repetition (RRA), bilateral fixed series (SFB) and unilateral fixed series (SFU). Total time, repetitions performed, blood lactate, maximum heart rate, pain perception and effort using the Borg and Omni scales were measured. Results: There was a significant difference (p < 0,01) in the repetition between the methods: SFB -41,4 ± 9,40; SFU -79,1 ± 13,3 e RRA -72,0 ± 0,0. And total time RRA with 114 seconds, 77 and 150 seconds difference for SFB and SFU respectively. In the other analyzes, no significant difference was observed between the methods. Conclusion:The present research didn’t find any significant difference in the blood lactate, volume, Borg and Omnis cales between the methods. However, there was a significant difference in the time variation of the alternating regressive repetition method for the others.
三种力量训练方法对训练女性的代谢和生理反应
目的:分析交替重复、双侧固定系列和单侧固定系列方法在女性训练中的急性疗效。研究方法:该研究由10名至少有4年健身练习的女性组成。每人进行4天的试验,第一天评估最大负荷,其余天进行交替回归重复(RRA)、双侧固定序列(SFB)和单侧固定序列(SFU)。使用Borg和Omni量表测量总时间、重复次数、血乳酸、最大心率、痛觉和努力。结果:两种方法的重复次数差异有统计学意义(p < 0.01): SFB -41、4±9、40;SFU -79,1±13,3;RRA -72,0±0,0;SFB和SFU的总时间RRA分别差114秒、77秒和150秒。在其他分析中,两种方法之间没有显著差异。结论:两种方法在血乳酸、血容量、博格钙、欧米尼钙等指标上均无显著差异。而交替回归重复法在时间变化方面存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信