A Comparison of the Effect of Short Abdominal Skin-To-Skin Contact and Kangaroo Skin Contact on Initiation of Successful Breastfeeding

Q4 Medicine
M. Adeli, S. Alirezaei, M. Kabiriyan, M. Safei
{"title":"A Comparison of the Effect of Short Abdominal Skin-To-Skin Contact and Kangaroo Skin Contact on Initiation of Successful Breastfeeding","authors":"M. Adeli, S. Alirezaei, M. Kabiriyan, M. Safei","doi":"10.18869/ACADPUB.JBUMS.20.2.70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Kangaroo skin contact is an important factor in breastfeeding. However, in contrast to abdominal contact, it is considered timely. Therefore, while shortening the contact time, this study aims at comparing the effects of short abdominal skin-to-skin contact and Kangaroo skin contact on successful breastfeeding. METHODS: This clinical trial study was conducted among pregnant women in maternity hospitals of Torbat Heydarieh in 2015. Sixty-eight primigravida women with term pregnancy and aged 18-40 years were selected through convenience sampling and were divided into two groups of intervention (Kangaroo skin contact) and control (abdominal skin contact). Questionnaires about demographic, fertility and medical data were completed for both groups. Infants with 8-10 Apgar and birth weight of 2500 – 4000 g were exposed to Kangaroo skin and abdominal skin contact for 5-10 minutes. After delivery, The Infant Breastfeeding Assessment Tool (IBFAT) was completed and the mean values of feeding desire, searching, latch on and sucking pattern were analyzed (IRCT: 2014090419039N1). FINDINGS: The mean feeding desire in the intervention group was 2.63±0.6 and in the control group was 2.61±0.6, searching was 2.76±0.43 and 2.73±0.44, latch on was 2.76±0.43 and 2.79±0.41, sucking pattern was 2.82±0.54 and 2.64±0.64, and total score was 11.84±5.10 and 10.79±1.82, respectively, indicating no significant difference in any of","PeriodicalId":15108,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences","volume":"26 1","pages":"70-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18869/ACADPUB.JBUMS.20.2.70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Kangaroo skin contact is an important factor in breastfeeding. However, in contrast to abdominal contact, it is considered timely. Therefore, while shortening the contact time, this study aims at comparing the effects of short abdominal skin-to-skin contact and Kangaroo skin contact on successful breastfeeding. METHODS: This clinical trial study was conducted among pregnant women in maternity hospitals of Torbat Heydarieh in 2015. Sixty-eight primigravida women with term pregnancy and aged 18-40 years were selected through convenience sampling and were divided into two groups of intervention (Kangaroo skin contact) and control (abdominal skin contact). Questionnaires about demographic, fertility and medical data were completed for both groups. Infants with 8-10 Apgar and birth weight of 2500 – 4000 g were exposed to Kangaroo skin and abdominal skin contact for 5-10 minutes. After delivery, The Infant Breastfeeding Assessment Tool (IBFAT) was completed and the mean values of feeding desire, searching, latch on and sucking pattern were analyzed (IRCT: 2014090419039N1). FINDINGS: The mean feeding desire in the intervention group was 2.63±0.6 and in the control group was 2.61±0.6, searching was 2.76±0.43 and 2.73±0.44, latch on was 2.76±0.43 and 2.79±0.41, sucking pattern was 2.82±0.54 and 2.64±0.64, and total score was 11.84±5.10 and 10.79±1.82, respectively, indicating no significant difference in any of
短腹部皮肤接触与袋鼠皮肤接触对成功启动母乳喂养效果的比较
背景与目的:袋鼠皮肤接触是影响母乳喂养的重要因素。然而,与腹部接触相比,它被认为是及时的。因此,在缩短接触时间的同时,本研究旨在比较腹部短皮肤接触和袋鼠皮肤接触对母乳喂养成功的影响。方法:本临床试验研究于2015年在Torbat Heydarieh妇产医院的孕妇中进行。采用方便抽样的方法,选取18 ~ 40岁足月初产妇68例,分为干预组(袋鼠皮肤接触组)和对照组(腹部皮肤接触组)。两组都完成了关于人口、生育和医疗数据的问卷调查。8-10 Apgar,出生体重2500 - 4000 g的婴儿与袋鼠皮肤和腹部皮肤接触5-10分钟。分娩后完成婴儿母乳喂养评估工具(IBFAT),分析喂养欲望、寻找、吸乳方式的平均值(IRCT: 2014090419039N1)。结果:干预组和对照组的平均喂饲欲望分别为2.63±0.6和2.61±0.6,搜索分别为2.76±0.43和2.73±0.44,闩合分别为2.76±0.43和2.79±0.41,吸吮方式分别为2.82±0.54和2.64±0.64,总分分别为11.84±5.10和10.79±1.82,差异均无统计学意义
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信