Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Belly Syndrome: Challenges of a Changing Paradigm

Archana Priyadarshi, M. Hinder, N. Badawi, M. Luig, M. Tracy
{"title":"Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Belly Syndrome: Challenges of a Changing Paradigm","authors":"Archana Priyadarshi, M. Hinder, N. Badawi, M. Luig, M. Tracy","doi":"10.14740/IJCP352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In extreme preterm infants, early use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for respiratory support reduces the incidence of chronic lung disease. However, as a sequel, inadvertent passage of air into the gastrointestinal tract leads to abdominal distension often with visibly dilated loops. The first description of “CPAP belly syndrome” in 1992, originates from the study in premature infants weighing less than 1,000 g and managed on nasal CPAP. The description of this phenomenon included benign episodic abdominal distension, with no associations to feed intolerance, and no radiological evidence of bowel wall thickening, pneumatosis or free air. With improving perinatal care, lesser gestational age infants are increasingly managed on early CPAP with resultant more frequent occurrence of CPAP belly syndrome. When extreme preterm infants on CPAP develop tense, marked abdominal distension, clinical decisions to cease feeds, administer empiric antibiotics and perform plain abdominal radiographs are all justified to screen for potentially serious causes. With rampant use of non-invasive respiratory support in extreme preterm infants, the occurrence of severe CPAP belly syndrome now extends to include clinical scenario mimicking a “necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) scare”. We present the case of an extreme preterm infant with severe CPAP belly syndrome that required rescue intubation due to a massively distended abdomen. The emergency management included change to invasive ventilation and exclusion of serious intestinal conditions such as NEC. In retrospect, the life-threatening marked abdominal distension was due to severe CPAP belly syndrome, contrary to its well-recognized benign description, three decades ago. The clinical paradigm of CPAP belly syndrome is evolving, and in its severe form in extreme preterm infants, warrants vigilant monitoring to differentiate it from severe progressive intestinal conditions, such as NEC. Further research is required to describe its causes, associated morbidities and the need to evaluate the utility of other diagnostic modalities to reassure clinicians. Int J Clin Pediatr. 2020;9(1):9-15 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/ijcp352","PeriodicalId":13773,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics","volume":"43 1","pages":"9-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/IJCP352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

In extreme preterm infants, early use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for respiratory support reduces the incidence of chronic lung disease. However, as a sequel, inadvertent passage of air into the gastrointestinal tract leads to abdominal distension often with visibly dilated loops. The first description of “CPAP belly syndrome” in 1992, originates from the study in premature infants weighing less than 1,000 g and managed on nasal CPAP. The description of this phenomenon included benign episodic abdominal distension, with no associations to feed intolerance, and no radiological evidence of bowel wall thickening, pneumatosis or free air. With improving perinatal care, lesser gestational age infants are increasingly managed on early CPAP with resultant more frequent occurrence of CPAP belly syndrome. When extreme preterm infants on CPAP develop tense, marked abdominal distension, clinical decisions to cease feeds, administer empiric antibiotics and perform plain abdominal radiographs are all justified to screen for potentially serious causes. With rampant use of non-invasive respiratory support in extreme preterm infants, the occurrence of severe CPAP belly syndrome now extends to include clinical scenario mimicking a “necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) scare”. We present the case of an extreme preterm infant with severe CPAP belly syndrome that required rescue intubation due to a massively distended abdomen. The emergency management included change to invasive ventilation and exclusion of serious intestinal conditions such as NEC. In retrospect, the life-threatening marked abdominal distension was due to severe CPAP belly syndrome, contrary to its well-recognized benign description, three decades ago. The clinical paradigm of CPAP belly syndrome is evolving, and in its severe form in extreme preterm infants, warrants vigilant monitoring to differentiate it from severe progressive intestinal conditions, such as NEC. Further research is required to describe its causes, associated morbidities and the need to evaluate the utility of other diagnostic modalities to reassure clinicians. Int J Clin Pediatr. 2020;9(1):9-15 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/ijcp352
持续气道正压腹综合征:改变范式的挑战
在极早产儿中,早期使用持续气道正压通气(CPAP)进行呼吸支持可减少慢性肺病的发病率。然而,其后果是,无意中空气进入胃肠道导致腹胀,通常伴有明显的扩张袢。1992年首次对“CPAP腹部综合征”进行了描述,起源于对体重小于1000g的早产儿进行鼻腔CPAP治疗的研究。这种现象的描述包括良性的间歇性腹胀,与喂养不耐受无关,也没有肠壁增厚、肺病或自由空气的放射证据。随着围产期护理的改善,越来越多的小胎龄婴儿接受早期CPAP治疗,导致CPAP腹部综合征的发生率更高。当使用CPAP的极度早产儿出现紧张、明显腹胀时,临床决定停止喂养、使用经验性抗生素和进行腹部x线平片检查,以筛查潜在的严重原因都是合理的。随着无创呼吸支持在极早产儿中的广泛应用,严重CPAP腹部综合征的发生现已扩展到包括模拟“坏死性小肠结肠炎(NEC)恐慌”的临床场景。我们提出的情况下,极端早产儿与严重的CPAP腹部综合征,需要抢救插管,由于腹部大量膨胀。紧急处理包括改变有创通气和排除严重的肠道疾病,如NEC。回想起来,危及生命的明显腹胀是由于严重的CPAP腹部综合征,与30年前公认的良性描述相反。CPAP腹部综合征的临床模式正在演变,其在极端早产儿中的严重形式需要警惕监测,以将其与严重的进行性肠道疾病(如NEC)区分开来。需要进一步的研究来描述其原因、相关的发病率和评估其他诊断方式的实用性的必要性,以使临床医生放心。国际儿科临床杂志,2020;9(1):9-15 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/ijcp352
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信