A scoping review of the literature on embodied instructional videos

IF 3.1 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Ecenaz Alemdag
{"title":"A scoping review of the literature on embodied instructional videos","authors":"Ecenaz Alemdag","doi":"10.58459/rptel.2023.18029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although it is prevalent to use embodied modes of information (e.g., instructors’ movements and gestures) in instructional videos, there is a lack of comprehensive review elucidating how this type of information is designed and investigated in research studies. This scoping review of the literature examined 55 empirical research articles with 71 separate studies regarding embodied instructional videos to reveal their characteristics and design factors and provide key findings regarding their effects. The results revealed that most videos included slides for the lecture and demonstration of science subjects. The following design factors were determined in embodied instructional videos: instructor demeanor, instructor visual presence, generative activities, learner characteristics, content, instructional media, and scene. The findings regarding their influence on learning supported existing embodiment principles. They also uncovered the contributing or moderating effect of instructors’ deictic gestures, facial expressions, and intimate behaviors, students’ prior knowledge and actions during learning, and the complexity of the video subject. Overall, this review provides helpful information for practitioners based on empirical evidence and indicates research gaps in the literature on embodied instructional videos.","PeriodicalId":37055,"journal":{"name":"Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning","volume":"25 1","pages":"29"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2023.18029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Although it is prevalent to use embodied modes of information (e.g., instructors’ movements and gestures) in instructional videos, there is a lack of comprehensive review elucidating how this type of information is designed and investigated in research studies. This scoping review of the literature examined 55 empirical research articles with 71 separate studies regarding embodied instructional videos to reveal their characteristics and design factors and provide key findings regarding their effects. The results revealed that most videos included slides for the lecture and demonstration of science subjects. The following design factors were determined in embodied instructional videos: instructor demeanor, instructor visual presence, generative activities, learner characteristics, content, instructional media, and scene. The findings regarding their influence on learning supported existing embodiment principles. They also uncovered the contributing or moderating effect of instructors’ deictic gestures, facial expressions, and intimate behaviors, students’ prior knowledge and actions during learning, and the complexity of the video subject. Overall, this review provides helpful information for practitioners based on empirical evidence and indicates research gaps in the literature on embodied instructional videos.
具身教学录影的文献综述
虽然在教学视频中普遍使用具体的信息模式(例如,教师的动作和手势),但缺乏全面的审查来阐明如何在研究中设计和调查这类信息。本文对55篇实证研究文章和71项关于具体化教学视频的独立研究进行了范围审查,以揭示其特征和设计因素,并提供有关其效果的关键发现。结果显示,大多数视频都包含科学科目讲座和演示的幻灯片。在具身教学视频中确定了以下设计因素:教师举止、教师视觉存在、生成性活动、学习者特征、内容、教学媒介和场景。关于他们对学习的影响的研究结果支持了现有的体现原则。他们还发现了教师的指示手势、面部表情和亲密行为、学生在学习过程中的先验知识和行为以及视频主题的复杂性的促进或调节作用。总体而言,本综述为实践者提供了基于经验证据的有用信息,并指出了具体化教学视频文献中的研究空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
3.10%
发文量
28
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信