Impact Bias in Regret: Comparisons Between Within-Subjects and Between-Subjects Designs, Kokaishita and Kuyashi, and the Presence and Absence of Reward1,2

IF 0.8 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Kenshiro Ichimura, Daiki Taoka, Rina Miyahara
{"title":"Impact Bias in Regret: Comparisons Between Within-Subjects and Between-Subjects Designs, Kokaishita and Kuyashi, and the Presence and Absence of Reward1,2","authors":"Kenshiro Ichimura,&nbsp;Daiki Taoka,&nbsp;Rina Miyahara","doi":"10.1111/jpr.12423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>When people anticipate future regret, they overestimate its strength compared to experienced regret. Two experiments investigated this impact bias of regret by manipulating regret type (anticipated/experienced) in a within-subjects design. Regret was measured using the Japanese words <i>kokaishita</i> (後悔した) and <i>kuyashi</i> (悔しい), which are both translated as “regret” in English but differ in nuance in Japanese. We compared the participants' feelings of <i>kokaishita</i> and <i>kuyashi</i> when they failed at tasks in which their decisions did or did not affect the outcome. In Experiment 1 but not Experiment 2, the participants were offered an additional reward for task success. The results suggested that (a) impact bias occurs robustly when the same person both anticipates and experiences regret; (b) <i>kokaishita</i> is felt in response to decision failures, while <i>kuyashi</i> is felt for any kind of task failure; and (c) the presence of additional rewards influences the intensity of <i>kokaishita</i> but not that of <i>kuyashi</i> or impact bias.</p>","PeriodicalId":46699,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Psychological Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jpr.12423","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Psychological Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpr.12423","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When people anticipate future regret, they overestimate its strength compared to experienced regret. Two experiments investigated this impact bias of regret by manipulating regret type (anticipated/experienced) in a within-subjects design. Regret was measured using the Japanese words kokaishita (後悔した) and kuyashi (悔しい), which are both translated as “regret” in English but differ in nuance in Japanese. We compared the participants' feelings of kokaishita and kuyashi when they failed at tasks in which their decisions did or did not affect the outcome. In Experiment 1 but not Experiment 2, the participants were offered an additional reward for task success. The results suggested that (a) impact bias occurs robustly when the same person both anticipates and experiences regret; (b) kokaishita is felt in response to decision failures, while kuyashi is felt for any kind of task failure; and (c) the presence of additional rewards influences the intensity of kokaishita but not that of kuyashi or impact bias.

Abstract Image

后悔的影响偏差:对象内设计和对象间设计、Kokaishita 和 Kuyashi 以及有无奖励的比较1,2
与经历过的后悔相比,当人们预期未来会后悔时,他们会高估后悔的强度。有两项实验通过在被试内设计中操纵后悔类型(预期的/经历过的)来研究后悔的影响偏差。我们使用日语单词 kokaishita(后悔した)和 kuyashi(悔しい)来测量 "后悔",这两个单词在英语中都被翻译为 "后悔",但在日语中却有细微差别。我们比较了参与者在任务失败时的 "悔下 "和 "悔上 "感受。在实验 1(而非实验 2)中,参与者在任务成功后会获得额外奖励。结果表明:(a) 当同一个人既预期到后悔又体验到后悔时,影响偏差就会发生;(b) 对决策失败的反应是 "后悔"(kokaishita),而对任何类型的任务失败都会产生 "后悔"(kuyashi);(c) 额外奖励的存在会影响 "后悔"(kokaishita)的强度,但不会影响 "后悔"(kuyashi)或影响偏差的强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Japanese Psychological Research
Japanese Psychological Research PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Each volume of Japanese Psychological Research features original contributions from members of the Japanese Psychological Association and other leading international researchers. The journal"s analysis of problem-orientated research contributes significantly to all fields of psychology and raises awareness of psychological research in Japan amongst psychologists world-wide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信