Trainees’ perceptions on learning environment based on the level of training in a pediatric training program in Indonesia

IF 0.2 Q4 PEDIATRICS
R. Triasih, Felisia Ang, Weda Kusuma, Gandes Retni Rahayu
{"title":"Trainees’ perceptions on learning environment based on the level of training in a pediatric training program in Indonesia","authors":"R. Triasih, Felisia Ang, Weda Kusuma, Gandes Retni Rahayu","doi":"10.14238/pi62.4.2022.249-56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Learning environment in a pediatric specialist training program is complex and may influence trainees’ performance and achievement. We evaluated the trainees’ perception on learning environment and compared it between levels of the training. \nMethods We conducted a cross-sectional study to pediatric trainees in Pediatric Specialist Training Program at Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia in May 2019. The data was collected online using the Postgraduate Hospital Educational Environment Measure (PHEEM) questionnaire, which was translated into Indonesian language and was self-completed by the trainees. \nResults All (136) trainees, which consisted of 35 (25.7%) junior, 44 (32.3%) middle, and 57 (42%) senior levels, completed the survey. The mean total score of PHEEM for all trainees was 108.10 (+ 17.03), which was not different between levels of the trainees. The mean scores for the role of autonomy, teaching, and social support were not different between levels of training either. Nevertheless, the junior scored less than the middle and senior trainees for questions on performing inappropriate tasks. \nConclusion The learning environment of the pediatric training program in our setting was perceived good but improvement was required. There was no difference in perception of learning environment based on the level of the training.","PeriodicalId":19660,"journal":{"name":"Paediatrica Indonesiana","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatrica Indonesiana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14238/pi62.4.2022.249-56","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Learning environment in a pediatric specialist training program is complex and may influence trainees’ performance and achievement. We evaluated the trainees’ perception on learning environment and compared it between levels of the training. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study to pediatric trainees in Pediatric Specialist Training Program at Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia in May 2019. The data was collected online using the Postgraduate Hospital Educational Environment Measure (PHEEM) questionnaire, which was translated into Indonesian language and was self-completed by the trainees. Results All (136) trainees, which consisted of 35 (25.7%) junior, 44 (32.3%) middle, and 57 (42%) senior levels, completed the survey. The mean total score of PHEEM for all trainees was 108.10 (+ 17.03), which was not different between levels of the trainees. The mean scores for the role of autonomy, teaching, and social support were not different between levels of training either. Nevertheless, the junior scored less than the middle and senior trainees for questions on performing inappropriate tasks. Conclusion The learning environment of the pediatric training program in our setting was perceived good but improvement was required. There was no difference in perception of learning environment based on the level of the training.
基于印度尼西亚儿科培训项目培训水平的受训者对学习环境的看法
背景:儿科专科培训项目的学习环境是复杂的,可能会影响受训者的表现和成就。我们评估了受训者对学习环境的感知,并比较了不同层次的培训。方法我们于2019年5月对印度尼西亚日惹Gadjah Mada大学儿科专家培训项目的儿科学员进行了一项横断面研究。数据是通过研究生医院教育环境测量(PHEEM)问卷在线收集的,该问卷被翻译成印尼语,由学员自行完成。结果136名学员全部完成调查,其中初级35人(25.7%),中级44人(32.3%),高级57人(42%)。所有学员的PHEEM平均总分为108.10分(+ 17.03分),各层次学员的PHEEM得分无显著差异。自主性、教学作用和社会支持的平均得分在不同训练水平之间也没有差异。然而,在执行不恰当任务的问题上,初级学员的得分低于中高级学员。结论我院儿科培训项目的学习环境良好,但仍需改进。不同训练水平的学生对学习环境的感知没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信