The Geometric World of Fishes: A Synthesis on Spatial Reorientation in Teleosts.

IF 3.4 2区经济学 Q1 REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING

Planning Theory & Practice Pub Date : 2022-03-30 DOI:10.3390/ani12070881

Greta Baratti, Davide Potrich, Sang Ah Lee, Anastasia Morandi-Raikova, Valeria Anna Sovrano

{"title":"The Geometric World of Fishes: A Synthesis on Spatial Reorientation in Teleosts.","authors":"Greta Baratti, Davide Potrich, Sang Ah Lee, Anastasia Morandi-Raikova, Valeria Anna Sovrano","doi":"10.3390/ani12070881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fishes navigate through underwater environments with remarkable spatial precision and memory. Freshwater and seawater species make use of several orientation strategies for adaptative behavior that is on par with terrestrial organisms, and research on cognitive mapping and landmark use in fish have shown that relational and associative spatial learning guide goal-directed navigation not only in terrestrial but also in aquatic habitats. In the past thirty years, researchers explored spatial cognition in fishes in relation to the use of environmental geometry, perhaps because of the scientific value to compare them with land-dwelling animals. Geometric navigation involves the encoding of macrostructural characteristics of space, which are based on the Euclidean concepts of \"points\", \"surfaces\", and \"boundaries\". The current review aims to inspect the extant literature on navigation by geometry in fishes, emphasizing both the recruitment of visual/extra-visual strategies and the nature of the behavioral task on orientation performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":47693,"journal":{"name":"Planning Theory & Practice","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8997125/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Planning Theory & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12070881","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fishes navigate through underwater environments with remarkable spatial precision and memory. Freshwater and seawater species make use of several orientation strategies for adaptative behavior that is on par with terrestrial organisms, and research on cognitive mapping and landmark use in fish have shown that relational and associative spatial learning guide goal-directed navigation not only in terrestrial but also in aquatic habitats. In the past thirty years, researchers explored spatial cognition in fishes in relation to the use of environmental geometry, perhaps because of the scientific value to compare them with land-dwelling animals. Geometric navigation involves the encoding of macrostructural characteristics of space, which are based on the Euclidean concepts of "points", "surfaces", and "boundaries". The current review aims to inspect the extant literature on navigation by geometry in fishes, emphasizing both the recruitment of visual/extra-visual strategies and the nature of the behavioral task on orientation performance.

查看原文本刊更多论文

鱼类的几何世界：关于远洋鱼类空间定向的综述

鱼类以非凡的空间精确度和记忆力在水下环境中航行。淡水和海水物种利用多种定向策略进行适应行为，与陆生生物不相上下。对鱼类认知图谱和地标使用的研究表明，关系和联想空间学习不仅在陆生生境中，而且在水生生境中都能指导目标定向导航。在过去的三十年中，研究人员探索了鱼类与使用环境几何相关的空间认知，这或许是因为将鱼类与陆栖动物进行比较具有科学价值。几何导航涉及空间宏观结构特征的编码，这些特征基于欧几里得的 "点"、"面 "和 "边界 "概念。本综述旨在考察有关鱼类几何导航的现有文献，强调视觉/超视觉策略的招募以及定向性能行为任务的性质。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Planning Theory & Practice Multiple-

CiteScore

5.40

自引率

5.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： Planning Theory & Practice provides an international focus for the development of theory and practice in spatial planning and a forum to promote the policy dimensions of space and place. Published four times a year in conjunction with the Royal Town Planning Institute, London, it publishes original articles and review papers from both academics and practitioners with the aim of encouraging more effective, two-way communication between theory and practice. The Editors invite robustly researched papers which raise issues at the leading edge of planning theory and practice, and welcome papers on controversial subjects. Contributors in the early stages of their academic careers are encouraged, as are rejoinders to items previously published.