Egyptian-Jewish Bohème

Lydia D. Goehr
{"title":"Egyptian-Jewish Bohème","authors":"Lydia D. Goehr","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197572443.003.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent histories addressing the modern conceptualization of bohème, the Egyptian-origin thesis, even while known, is rarely subjected to vigorous enquiry. This is less true of histories written about the Gypsies, from which we learn that, around 1800, the thesis was rejected, and partly by being made explicit within the new sciences of the Enlightenment. Various disciplinary perspectives were engaged to prove that if the Gypsies originated in one place, then the place was not Egypt but India. But this thesis proved no less contrived than the rejected one. Chapter 11 focuses on the Egyptian-origin thesis, where the wandering of the Egyptian-Gypsies was brought into constant comparison and contrast with that of the Jews.","PeriodicalId":62574,"journal":{"name":"红树林","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"红树林","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197572443.003.0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent histories addressing the modern conceptualization of bohème, the Egyptian-origin thesis, even while known, is rarely subjected to vigorous enquiry. This is less true of histories written about the Gypsies, from which we learn that, around 1800, the thesis was rejected, and partly by being made explicit within the new sciences of the Enlightenment. Various disciplinary perspectives were engaged to prove that if the Gypsies originated in one place, then the place was not Egypt but India. But this thesis proved no less contrived than the rejected one. Chapter 11 focuses on the Egyptian-origin thesis, where the wandering of the Egyptian-Gypsies was brought into constant comparison and contrast with that of the Jews.
Egyptian-Jewish Boheme
在最近的历史中,关于boh的现代概念,埃及起源的论点,即使是已知的,也很少受到有力的调查。关于吉普赛人的历史就不那么真实了,我们从中得知,在1800年左右,这个论点被拒绝了,部分原因是在启蒙运动的新科学中得到了明确的阐述。各种学科的观点都被用来证明,如果吉普赛人起源于一个地方,那么这个地方不是埃及,而是印度。但事实证明,这一论点与被拒绝的论点一样做作。第11章着重于埃及起源的论点,其中埃及-吉普赛人的流浪与犹太人的流浪不断地被比较和对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信