The urban block in Western Serbia boroughs in the 19th century

Dusko Kuzovic
{"title":"The urban block in Western Serbia boroughs in the 19th century","authors":"Dusko Kuzovic","doi":"10.5937/ZRGFUB1901015K","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Boroughs in southwestern Serbia were created during the 19th century. Development began after 1830, primarily through the construction of planned settlements (Požega, 1832; Rogačica, 1839; Bajina Bašta,1858). Thereafter, the reconstruction of old settlements (Užice,1863) or settlements previously founded according to plans that were not respected began (Ivanjica, 1848). In the third phase, it was accessed by the regulation of the boroughs were formed on the routes of important roads (Kosjerić, 1892) or in addition to important church centres (Arilje, 1880). As one of the important elements of the settlement stands out the urban block. The paper research: the relationship between the block and the street/street front, block and plot, and block and neighbourhood units. The geometry of the block in the planned townships was the result of a definition of the street network. Through the plans, the street network was first defined and the space between the streets was reserved for the block. The block was not the goal of the planning process but the traffic network. In the spontaneously formed towns, the main street was formed along the route of the roads. In Užice, through two plans (1863,1891) has been finished corrections of the geometry of the blocks, retaining the existing routes of the streets. The plotting within the block depends on the time and the way the borough was formed. In the plan of Požega (1832), only the network of streets and squares is defined (no parcels are planned within the block). The mistakes were partially corrected in the plan of Rogačica (1839), where the plots did not have the necessary site-related characteristics (centre zone of the settlement was not different from the periphery). The final improvement was made on the plan of Bajina Bašta (1858), 1 Corresponding author: D. Kuzović, College of Engineering, Depratment of Architecture Engineering, Dhofar Univesity, Salalah, Sultanate of Oman; e-mail: dusko.kuzovic@gmail.com","PeriodicalId":32584,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Radova Geografski Fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Radova Geografski Fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/ZRGFUB1901015K","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Boroughs in southwestern Serbia were created during the 19th century. Development began after 1830, primarily through the construction of planned settlements (Požega, 1832; Rogačica, 1839; Bajina Bašta,1858). Thereafter, the reconstruction of old settlements (Užice,1863) or settlements previously founded according to plans that were not respected began (Ivanjica, 1848). In the third phase, it was accessed by the regulation of the boroughs were formed on the routes of important roads (Kosjerić, 1892) or in addition to important church centres (Arilje, 1880). As one of the important elements of the settlement stands out the urban block. The paper research: the relationship between the block and the street/street front, block and plot, and block and neighbourhood units. The geometry of the block in the planned townships was the result of a definition of the street network. Through the plans, the street network was first defined and the space between the streets was reserved for the block. The block was not the goal of the planning process but the traffic network. In the spontaneously formed towns, the main street was formed along the route of the roads. In Užice, through two plans (1863,1891) has been finished corrections of the geometry of the blocks, retaining the existing routes of the streets. The plotting within the block depends on the time and the way the borough was formed. In the plan of Požega (1832), only the network of streets and squares is defined (no parcels are planned within the block). The mistakes were partially corrected in the plan of Rogačica (1839), where the plots did not have the necessary site-related characteristics (centre zone of the settlement was not different from the periphery). The final improvement was made on the plan of Bajina Bašta (1858), 1 Corresponding author: D. Kuzović, College of Engineering, Depratment of Architecture Engineering, Dhofar Univesity, Salalah, Sultanate of Oman; e-mail: dusko.kuzovic@gmail.com
19世纪塞尔维亚西部市镇的城市街区
塞尔维亚西南部的自治市镇建于19世纪。1830年后开始发展,主要是通过建设规划的定居点(Požega, 1832;Rogačica, 1839;Bajina英航š助教,1858)。此后,开始重建旧定居点(Užice,1863)或先前根据不受尊重的计划建立的定居点(Ivanjica, 1848)。在第三阶段,它通过在重要道路(kosjeriki, 1892年)或重要教堂中心(Arilje, 1880年)的路线上形成的行政区的规定进入。城市街区是聚落的重要组成部分之一。本文主要研究街区与街道/街面、街区与地块、街区与邻里单元之间的关系。在规划的城镇中,街区的几何形状是街道网络定义的结果。通过规划,街道网络首先被定义,街道之间的空间被保留给街区。街区不是规划过程的目标,而是交通网络。在自发形成的城镇中,主要街道沿着道路的路线形成。在Užice,通过两个计划(1863年,1891年)已经完成了修正的几何块,保留现有的街道路线。街区内的绘图取决于自治市镇形成的时间和方式。在Požega(1832)的规划中,只定义了街道和广场的网络(在街区内没有规划地块)。在roga ica(1839年)的规划中,这些错误得到了部分纠正,其中的地块没有必要的与基地相关的特征(聚落的中心区与外围没有什么不同)。最后的改进是在Bajina的计划Bašta(1858), 1通讯作者:D. kuzoviki,工程学院,建筑工程系,佐法尔大学,萨拉拉,阿曼苏丹国;电子邮件:dusko.kuzovic@gmail.com
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信