D. Yuste-Vila , A. Albert-Mari , V. Jiménez-Arenas , N.V. Jiménez-Torres
{"title":"Management of returned anti-neoplastic treatments and their reuse in oncology patients","authors":"D. Yuste-Vila , A. Albert-Mari , V. Jiménez-Arenas , N.V. Jiménez-Torres","doi":"10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70087-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Analyse the profile of parenteral preparation and treatment (anti-neoplastic and supplementary) that were dispensed and returned to the Pharmacy Department, the reasons why they were not administered, their reuse and the associated direct costs.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Longitudinal study over 8 months (October 2004-May 2005) in a tertiary hospital with centre for preparing anti-neoplastic agents (including supplementary treatment) in its Pharmacy Department. The variables studied, downloaded from the Oncofarm® application, are as follows: a) patients and diagnostics; b) returned treatments, classified by reason returned, pharmaco-therapeutic scheme, cycle, and day; c) returned preparations (anti-neoplastic and supplementary) that were reused; and d) direct costs.</p><p>Data is presented with its absolute and relative frequencies and confidence intervals of 95% normalised at 1000 patients/day.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eighty-four treatments were returned by 66 patients for a total of 139 preparations corresponding to 3429 patients/day. This figure represents 24.5 (95% CI, 19.6-30.2) treatments that were prepared and not administered per 1000 patients/day, mainly due to clinical causes (n=47). Colon neoplasia and treatment with 5-fluorouracil and levofolinic acid presented the highest number of returns. The returned preparations made up 1.45% (95% CI, 1.2-1.7) of those produced. The percentage of reuse is 98%, which results in savings of €10 432.55 (90% of the cost of the treatments that are returned).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The application of quality, effectiveness, and safety criteria to anti-neoplastic treatments that are prepared and returned to the Pharmacy Department allows a more efficient preparation process.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100521,"journal":{"name":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","volume":"33 4","pages":"Pages 217-223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70087-5","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173508509700875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Objective
Analyse the profile of parenteral preparation and treatment (anti-neoplastic and supplementary) that were dispensed and returned to the Pharmacy Department, the reasons why they were not administered, their reuse and the associated direct costs.
Method
Longitudinal study over 8 months (October 2004-May 2005) in a tertiary hospital with centre for preparing anti-neoplastic agents (including supplementary treatment) in its Pharmacy Department. The variables studied, downloaded from the Oncofarm® application, are as follows: a) patients and diagnostics; b) returned treatments, classified by reason returned, pharmaco-therapeutic scheme, cycle, and day; c) returned preparations (anti-neoplastic and supplementary) that were reused; and d) direct costs.
Data is presented with its absolute and relative frequencies and confidence intervals of 95% normalised at 1000 patients/day.
Results
Eighty-four treatments were returned by 66 patients for a total of 139 preparations corresponding to 3429 patients/day. This figure represents 24.5 (95% CI, 19.6-30.2) treatments that were prepared and not administered per 1000 patients/day, mainly due to clinical causes (n=47). Colon neoplasia and treatment with 5-fluorouracil and levofolinic acid presented the highest number of returns. The returned preparations made up 1.45% (95% CI, 1.2-1.7) of those produced. The percentage of reuse is 98%, which results in savings of €10 432.55 (90% of the cost of the treatments that are returned).
Conclusions
The application of quality, effectiveness, and safety criteria to anti-neoplastic treatments that are prepared and returned to the Pharmacy Department allows a more efficient preparation process.