Management of returned anti-neoplastic treatments and their reuse in oncology patients

D. Yuste-Vila , A. Albert-Mari , V. Jiménez-Arenas , N.V. Jiménez-Torres
{"title":"Management of returned anti-neoplastic treatments and their reuse in oncology patients","authors":"D. Yuste-Vila ,&nbsp;A. Albert-Mari ,&nbsp;V. Jiménez-Arenas ,&nbsp;N.V. Jiménez-Torres","doi":"10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70087-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Analyse the profile of parenteral preparation and treatment (anti-neoplastic and supplementary) that were dispensed and returned to the Pharmacy Department, the reasons why they were not administered, their reuse and the associated direct costs.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Longitudinal study over 8 months (October 2004-May 2005) in a tertiary hospital with centre for preparing anti-neoplastic agents (including supplementary treatment) in its Pharmacy Department. The variables studied, downloaded from the Oncofarm® application, are as follows: a) patients and diagnostics; b) returned treatments, classified by reason returned, pharmaco-therapeutic scheme, cycle, and day; c) returned preparations (anti-neoplastic and supplementary) that were reused; and d) direct costs.</p><p>Data is presented with its absolute and relative frequencies and confidence intervals of 95% normalised at 1000 patients/day.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eighty-four treatments were returned by 66 patients for a total of 139 preparations corresponding to 3429 patients/day. This figure represents 24.5 (95% CI, 19.6-30.2) treatments that were prepared and not administered per 1000 patients/day, mainly due to clinical causes (n=47). Colon neoplasia and treatment with 5-fluorouracil and levofolinic acid presented the highest number of returns. The returned preparations made up 1.45% (95% CI, 1.2-1.7) of those produced. The percentage of reuse is 98%, which results in savings of €10 432.55 (90% of the cost of the treatments that are returned).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The application of quality, effectiveness, and safety criteria to anti-neoplastic treatments that are prepared and returned to the Pharmacy Department allows a more efficient preparation process.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100521,"journal":{"name":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","volume":"33 4","pages":"Pages 217-223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70087-5","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173508509700875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective

Analyse the profile of parenteral preparation and treatment (anti-neoplastic and supplementary) that were dispensed and returned to the Pharmacy Department, the reasons why they were not administered, their reuse and the associated direct costs.

Method

Longitudinal study over 8 months (October 2004-May 2005) in a tertiary hospital with centre for preparing anti-neoplastic agents (including supplementary treatment) in its Pharmacy Department. The variables studied, downloaded from the Oncofarm® application, are as follows: a) patients and diagnostics; b) returned treatments, classified by reason returned, pharmaco-therapeutic scheme, cycle, and day; c) returned preparations (anti-neoplastic and supplementary) that were reused; and d) direct costs.

Data is presented with its absolute and relative frequencies and confidence intervals of 95% normalised at 1000 patients/day.

Results

Eighty-four treatments were returned by 66 patients for a total of 139 preparations corresponding to 3429 patients/day. This figure represents 24.5 (95% CI, 19.6-30.2) treatments that were prepared and not administered per 1000 patients/day, mainly due to clinical causes (n=47). Colon neoplasia and treatment with 5-fluorouracil and levofolinic acid presented the highest number of returns. The returned preparations made up 1.45% (95% CI, 1.2-1.7) of those produced. The percentage of reuse is 98%, which results in savings of €10 432.55 (90% of the cost of the treatments that are returned).

Conclusions

The application of quality, effectiveness, and safety criteria to anti-neoplastic treatments that are prepared and returned to the Pharmacy Department allows a more efficient preparation process.

肿瘤患者复发抗肿瘤治疗的管理及再用药
目的分析我院配发后退回药物科的非肠外制剂及治疗(抗肿瘤及补充)的情况、未给药原因、重复使用情况及相关直接费用。方法2004年10月- 2005年5月,在某三级医院药学部设有抗肿瘤药物(含辅助治疗)制备中心,进行为期8个月的纵向研究。从Oncofarm®应用程序下载的研究变量如下:a)患者和诊断;B)返回治疗,按返回原因、药物治疗方案、周期和天数分类;C)退回的重复使用的制剂(抗肿瘤制剂和补充制剂);d)直接成本。数据以绝对频率和相对频率呈现,95%的置信区间以1000例/天归一化。结果66例患者返回84个治疗方案,共139个制剂,对应3429例患者/天。这一数字代表了每1000名患者/天中有24.5 (95% CI, 19.6-30.2)种治疗方法被准备好但没有被使用,主要是由于临床原因(n=47)。结肠肿瘤和5-氟尿嘧啶和左旋亚油酸治疗的复发率最高。返回制剂占生产制剂的1.45% (95% CI, 1.2-1.7)。再利用的百分比为98%,节省了10432.55欧元(90%的处理成本被回收)。结论将质量、有效性和安全性标准应用于制备和返回药房的抗肿瘤药物,可以提高制备过程的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信