Leuprorelin and Triptorelin in the treatment of Prostate Cancer: Medication adherence, Persistence and Economic Evaluation in Five Years of Analysis

F. Santoleri, P. Sorice, R. Lasala
{"title":"Leuprorelin and Triptorelin in the treatment of Prostate Cancer: Medication adherence, Persistence and Economic Evaluation in Five Years of Analysis","authors":"F. Santoleri, P. Sorice, R. Lasala","doi":"10.15344/2394-1502/2014/101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: A successful of home treatment is strongly influenced by patient adherence to treatment. Non-adherence represents not only an important issue for the patient, affecting both the clinical efficacy and safety of the medication regimen, but also has economical and social implication for the community. Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate medication adherence, persistence to treatment and daily cost of therapy in patients with prostate cancer treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists, comparing Leuprorelin 3.75mg-11.25mg and Triptorelin 3.75mg-11.25mg. Materials and Methods: The study was carried out from 2007 to 2012 in an Italian Hospital in Pescara. This is a General Hospital with 800 beds. Medication adherence was measured as the ratio between the Received Daily Dose (RDD) and the Prescribed Daily Dose (PDD), using software developed ad hoc by the hospital pharmacists. The RDD was calculated dividing the dose of drug dispensed in a pharmacy refill by the sum of days between two consecutive drug refills. PDD was determined in basis of the treatment regimen as prescribed by physician. The non-persistence was calculated like the effective days of treatment, that is the sum of days elapsing between the first and the last pharmacy refill, plus the days of treatment supplied with the last refill, minus the days of non-persistence, and it was graphically represented by the Kaplan Meier curves. The daily cost of treatment was calculated on the basis of the RDD. Results: The patients included in this study were 239 for Leuprorelin and 199 for Triptorelin. The adherence values for all drugs ranged between from 0.92 to 1.00, showing good quality management of treatment at home. The analysis of non-persistence conducted in four years (with patients included until 31 December 2007) showed a decrease by a 21% for Leuprorelin and 38% for Triptorelin, using the Log Rank Test the persistence for two drugs are not significantly different. The cost per RDD was of € 2.24 for Leuprorelin and € 2.84 for Triptorelin. Conclusion: Often health personnel have not a precise idea on behavior of patient in home therapy for chronic disease; calculation of adherence is very important to know what the real pharmacoutilization of drugs is, and our results showed a good profile of medication adherence for both drugs studied. Economic results give a difference of 60 cent per day, one year of therapy with Triptorelin is approximately € 219 more expensive than Leuprorelin per patient; we think that this kind of comparisons would be encouraged, that could be really useful for decisors of National Regulatory Agencies to negotiate the pricing of drugs on the basis of the real utilization in clinical practice, and for clinicians to make a good cost-effectiveness choice.","PeriodicalId":90866,"journal":{"name":"International journal of pharmaceutical sciences and research","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of pharmaceutical sciences and research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15344/2394-1502/2014/101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: A successful of home treatment is strongly influenced by patient adherence to treatment. Non-adherence represents not only an important issue for the patient, affecting both the clinical efficacy and safety of the medication regimen, but also has economical and social implication for the community. Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate medication adherence, persistence to treatment and daily cost of therapy in patients with prostate cancer treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists, comparing Leuprorelin 3.75mg-11.25mg and Triptorelin 3.75mg-11.25mg. Materials and Methods: The study was carried out from 2007 to 2012 in an Italian Hospital in Pescara. This is a General Hospital with 800 beds. Medication adherence was measured as the ratio between the Received Daily Dose (RDD) and the Prescribed Daily Dose (PDD), using software developed ad hoc by the hospital pharmacists. The RDD was calculated dividing the dose of drug dispensed in a pharmacy refill by the sum of days between two consecutive drug refills. PDD was determined in basis of the treatment regimen as prescribed by physician. The non-persistence was calculated like the effective days of treatment, that is the sum of days elapsing between the first and the last pharmacy refill, plus the days of treatment supplied with the last refill, minus the days of non-persistence, and it was graphically represented by the Kaplan Meier curves. The daily cost of treatment was calculated on the basis of the RDD. Results: The patients included in this study were 239 for Leuprorelin and 199 for Triptorelin. The adherence values for all drugs ranged between from 0.92 to 1.00, showing good quality management of treatment at home. The analysis of non-persistence conducted in four years (with patients included until 31 December 2007) showed a decrease by a 21% for Leuprorelin and 38% for Triptorelin, using the Log Rank Test the persistence for two drugs are not significantly different. The cost per RDD was of € 2.24 for Leuprorelin and € 2.84 for Triptorelin. Conclusion: Often health personnel have not a precise idea on behavior of patient in home therapy for chronic disease; calculation of adherence is very important to know what the real pharmacoutilization of drugs is, and our results showed a good profile of medication adherence for both drugs studied. Economic results give a difference of 60 cent per day, one year of therapy with Triptorelin is approximately € 219 more expensive than Leuprorelin per patient; we think that this kind of comparisons would be encouraged, that could be really useful for decisors of National Regulatory Agencies to negotiate the pricing of drugs on the basis of the real utilization in clinical practice, and for clinicians to make a good cost-effectiveness choice.
雷连林和雷普雷林治疗前列腺癌:五年的药物依从性、持久性和经济评价分析
背景:家庭治疗的成功与否很大程度上取决于患者对治疗的依从性。不依从性不仅是患者的一个重要问题,影响到药物治疗方案的临床疗效和安全性,而且对社区也具有经济和社会意义。目的:评价促性腺激素释放激素激动剂治疗前列腺癌患者的药物依从性、治疗持久性和每日治疗费用,比较Leuprorelin 3.75mg-11.25mg和Triptorelin 3.75mg-11.25mg。材料与方法:研究于2007年至2012年在佩斯卡拉的一家意大利医院进行。这是一家有800张床位的综合医院。使用医院药剂师专门开发的软件,以每日接受剂量(RDD)与处方每日剂量(PDD)之间的比率来测量药物依从性。RDD的计算方法是将药房重新配药的药物剂量除以两次连续配药之间的天数之和。PDD是根据医生规定的治疗方案确定的。非持续性的计算方法类似于有效治疗天数,即从第一次和最后一次补药之间的天数总和,加上最后一次补药提供的治疗天数,减去非持续性的天数,用Kaplan Meier曲线图形化地表示。根据RDD计算每日治疗费用。结果:Leuprorelin患者239例,Triptorelin患者199例。所有药物的依从性值在0.92 ~ 1.00之间,表明家庭治疗管理质量良好。在四年的非持续性分析中(包括2007年12月31日之前的患者),使用Log Rank检验显示,Leuprorelin和Triptorelin的持久性下降了21%和38%,两种药物的持久性没有显著差异。Leuprorelin和Triptorelin的RDD成本分别为2.24欧元和2.84欧元。结论:在慢性病家庭治疗中,卫生人员往往对患者的行为缺乏准确的认识;依从性的计算对于了解药物的真正药物利用是非常重要的,我们的结果显示两种药物的药物依从性都很好。经济结果显示,每天的差异为60美分,使用雷普雷林治疗一年的费用比每位患者使用雷普雷林大约贵219欧元;我们认为这种比较是值得鼓励的,这对国家监管机构的决策者在临床实践中根据实际使用情况来协商药物定价非常有用,也有助于临床医生做出一个好的成本效益选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信