Evaluation of Efficacy of Neuro Muscular Electrical Stimulation and Electro Acupuncture in Improving the Pain and Disability in Patients with the Lumbar Degenerative Intervertebral Disk Disease

Zeinab Faraji Qomi, Shahin Salehi, O. Hesami, Mehrshad Poorsaed Esfahani, Amir Hosein Abedi Yekta, M. Hassabi, M. Sohrabi, M. Elahi
{"title":"Evaluation of Efficacy of Neuro Muscular Electrical Stimulation and Electro Acupuncture in Improving the Pain and Disability in Patients with the Lumbar Degenerative Intervertebral Disk Disease","authors":"Zeinab Faraji Qomi, Shahin Salehi, O. Hesami, Mehrshad Poorsaed Esfahani, Amir Hosein Abedi Yekta, M. Hassabi, M. Sohrabi, M. Elahi","doi":"10.22037/NBM.V1I1.29082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) due to the degenerative intervertebral disk diseases is one of the most common musculoskeletal conditions in contemporary societies. A variety of pharmacological, non-pharmacological and surgical options is available for treatment of CLBP. The use of non-pharmacological methods have drastically increased in recent years, offering fewer complications and expenses. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of the neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and electro acupuncture (EAP) with exercise therapy alone in patients with chronic low back pain. Materials and Methods: This was a randomized case-controlled clinical trial. Sixty patients with CLBP were randomly assigned to 3 groups (20 cases each) of the EAP with exercise therapy, NMES with exercise therapy, and exercise therapy only. Severity of pain and disability improvement were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) and Quebec back pain disability scale respectively. Results: A total of 66 individuals were enrolled, out of which 6 were excluded due to patients’ lack of cooperation. A significant decline in the amounts of Quebec and VAS was observed in the three groups ( p <0.001). The pain and disability improvements did not display any significant difference in the NMES or EAP groups compared to the control group. However, the severity of disability and pain in the NMES group were significantly higher than the EAP group ( p <0.05). Conclusion: These findings may indicate an almost identical efficacy of exercise therapy alone compared to the combination with electrical stimulation techniques in improving the pain and disability in patients suffering CLBP.","PeriodicalId":19372,"journal":{"name":"Novelty in Biomedicine","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Novelty in Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/NBM.V1I1.29082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) due to the degenerative intervertebral disk diseases is one of the most common musculoskeletal conditions in contemporary societies. A variety of pharmacological, non-pharmacological and surgical options is available for treatment of CLBP. The use of non-pharmacological methods have drastically increased in recent years, offering fewer complications and expenses. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of the neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and electro acupuncture (EAP) with exercise therapy alone in patients with chronic low back pain. Materials and Methods: This was a randomized case-controlled clinical trial. Sixty patients with CLBP were randomly assigned to 3 groups (20 cases each) of the EAP with exercise therapy, NMES with exercise therapy, and exercise therapy only. Severity of pain and disability improvement were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) and Quebec back pain disability scale respectively. Results: A total of 66 individuals were enrolled, out of which 6 were excluded due to patients’ lack of cooperation. A significant decline in the amounts of Quebec and VAS was observed in the three groups ( p <0.001). The pain and disability improvements did not display any significant difference in the NMES or EAP groups compared to the control group. However, the severity of disability and pain in the NMES group were significantly higher than the EAP group ( p <0.05). Conclusion: These findings may indicate an almost identical efficacy of exercise therapy alone compared to the combination with electrical stimulation techniques in improving the pain and disability in patients suffering CLBP.
神经肌肉电刺激与电针治疗腰椎退行性椎间盘病患者疼痛和残疾的疗效评价
背景:由退变性椎间盘疾病引起的慢性腰痛(CLBP)是当代社会最常见的肌肉骨骼疾病之一。多种药物,非药物和手术选择可用于治疗CLBP。近年来,非药物方法的使用急剧增加,并发症和费用减少。本研究旨在比较神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)和电针(EAP)与单纯运动疗法对慢性腰痛患者的疗效。材料与方法:这是一项随机病例对照临床试验。将60例CLBP患者随机分为EAP联合运动治疗组、NMES联合运动治疗组和仅运动治疗组,每组20例。分别采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和魁北克背痛残疾量表评估疼痛严重程度和残疾改善程度。结果:共纳入66人,其中6人因患者不配合被排除。三组患者的Quebec评分和VAS评分均显著下降(p <0.001)。与对照组相比,NMES组和EAP组的疼痛和残疾改善没有显示出任何显著差异。而NMES组的残疾程度和疼痛程度均显著高于EAP组(p <0.05)。结论:这些发现可能表明,在改善CLBP患者的疼痛和残疾方面,单独运动疗法与联合电刺激技术的疗效几乎相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信