Evaluation for the Novel mecC MethicillinResistance among Methicillin ResistantStaphylococcal Isolates in two EgyptianUniversity Hospitals

Rania Aa, Nsreen Mk, R. Hel, Mona Ma
{"title":"Evaluation for the Novel mecC MethicillinResistance among Methicillin ResistantStaphylococcal Isolates in two EgyptianUniversity Hospitals","authors":"Rania Aa, Nsreen Mk, R. Hel, Mona Ma","doi":"10.4172/1989-8436.100071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Methicillin resistance adds to the threat of staphylococcal infections in humans. The gene for methicillin resistance in staphylococci is not only mecA gene as it was thought. The recently discovered mecC gene in animal and human isolates also encodes for methicillin resistance. The prevalence of the novel gene may be underestimated. It is discovered so far in Europe with low prevalence. This study evaluates the existence of mecC gene in two Egyptian university hospitals. A total of 600 methicillin resistant (520 MRSA and 80 MRCoNS) isolates from two university hospitals were screened for discrepancy in susceptibility between cefoxitin (30 μg) and oxacillin (1 μg) by disc diffusion as a method that could be used to predict the potential existence of mecC gene whose protein product has noticeably higher affinity for oxacillin. Discordant isolates included in selected 150 samples (110 MRSA and 40 MR-CoNS) were tested by PBP2a latex agglutination test, and or conventional PCR for mecA gene. Samples negative for mecA gene were tested for oxacillin and cefoxitin MIC by Vitec II and for mecC gene by PCR. All discrepant isolates were positive for PBP2a latex agglutination and mecA PCR, while the 6 isolates (5.5%) negative for mecA by PCR were resistant to both cefoxitin and oxacillin by disc diffusion and by Vitec II. In addition, those 6 isolates negative for mecA were also negative for mecC gene. Thus mecC gene for methicillin resistance couldn’t be detected in this study, though this may be baseline for further prevalence studies.","PeriodicalId":8142,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Microbiology","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/1989-8436.100071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Methicillin resistance adds to the threat of staphylococcal infections in humans. The gene for methicillin resistance in staphylococci is not only mecA gene as it was thought. The recently discovered mecC gene in animal and human isolates also encodes for methicillin resistance. The prevalence of the novel gene may be underestimated. It is discovered so far in Europe with low prevalence. This study evaluates the existence of mecC gene in two Egyptian university hospitals. A total of 600 methicillin resistant (520 MRSA and 80 MRCoNS) isolates from two university hospitals were screened for discrepancy in susceptibility between cefoxitin (30 μg) and oxacillin (1 μg) by disc diffusion as a method that could be used to predict the potential existence of mecC gene whose protein product has noticeably higher affinity for oxacillin. Discordant isolates included in selected 150 samples (110 MRSA and 40 MR-CoNS) were tested by PBP2a latex agglutination test, and or conventional PCR for mecA gene. Samples negative for mecA gene were tested for oxacillin and cefoxitin MIC by Vitec II and for mecC gene by PCR. All discrepant isolates were positive for PBP2a latex agglutination and mecA PCR, while the 6 isolates (5.5%) negative for mecA by PCR were resistant to both cefoxitin and oxacillin by disc diffusion and by Vitec II. In addition, those 6 isolates negative for mecA were also negative for mecC gene. Thus mecC gene for methicillin resistance couldn’t be detected in this study, though this may be baseline for further prevalence studies.
埃及两所大学医院耐甲氧西林葡萄球菌新型耐甲氧西林葡萄球菌的评价
甲氧西林耐药性增加了人类葡萄球菌感染的威胁。葡萄球菌耐甲氧西林基因并不像以前认为的那样仅仅是mecA基因。最近在动物和人类分离株中发现的mecC基因也编码甲氧西林耐药性。这种新基因的流行程度可能被低估了。到目前为止,在欧洲发现的发病率很低。本研究评估了埃及两所大学医院中mecC基因的存在。对两所大学医院的600株耐甲氧西林菌株(520株MRSA和80株MRCoNS)进行盘片扩散筛选,检测头孢西丁(30 μg)和奥西林(1 μg)的敏感性差异,预测其蛋白产物对奥西林具有明显较高亲和力的mecC基因是否存在。采用PBP2a胶乳凝集试验和常规PCR对150个样本(110株MRSA和40株MR-CoNS)中不一致的分离株进行mecA基因检测。对mecA基因阴性的样品,分别用Vitecⅱ检测oxacillin和头孢西丁MIC, PCR检测mecC基因。PBP2a胶乳凝集和mecA PCR检测均为阳性,mecA PCR检测为阴性的6株(5.5%)对头孢西丁和邻苯西林均耐药。此外,mecA阴性的6株菌株mecC基因也呈阴性。因此,本研究未检测到甲氧西林耐药的mecC基因,但这可能是进一步流行病学研究的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信