{"title":"Microbial fuel cell: a prospective sustainable solution for energy and environmental crisis","authors":"P. Mukherjee, P. Mishra, P. Saravanan","doi":"10.15406/IJBSBE.2018.04.00124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Microbial fuel cell or microbial electrochemical cell is a novel and sustainable approach to harvest electricity through biological route. It utilises organic rich wastewater with predominately carbohydrates as an electrolyte and thereby paradigm has been shifted, as the waste is metabolised to electrical energy.1 The MFC combines the conventional electrochemical cell with the bio-catalytic actions of microbes to harvest the bio-electricity. The idea of metabolicelectricity was first proposed by Potter in 1911 to draw electricity by utilization of bio-catalytic activity of exoelectrogens.2 In recent years, it has emerged as a multidimensional technology owing to its numerous advantages over the both conventional energy resources and existing wastewater treatment system. In addition, this versatile utility has great affinity to remove the total nitrogen, BOD and COD and can be utilized as biosensor to evaluate the organics.3 Moreover, this emerging technology is significantly devoted to alleviate the environmental stress associated in the emission of greenhouse gases into the environment. Also the world’s demand for energy per capita is surging annually proportionate to the economic growth of the nation in order to leap their industrial and technical advancement. Hence, this emerging green technology could be an intensive alternative to reduce the burden of increased energy crisis and meet the societal needs.4 As it is well known that most conventional wastewater treatment technology is not as efficient to remove the substantial amount of pollutants from grey water.5 Moreover, these adopts expensive technologies employing sophisticated instruments, infrastructures and occupies huge land area. Thus adopting MFCs instead of the above said conventional process would be a preferable option to harvest apparently pollution-free energy from wastewater. However, before leaping the technology to commercial level significant enhancement need to be undertaken as an intensive concern by researchers to develop a robust system.5 For an instance, implementation of two stage MFC in the place traditional single stages is a most simple prevailing alternative. Provided the two stage has to be constructed with inert material along with intact proton exchange membrane and a high potential electrode.3, 6 The functional properties of MFC would depends upon the metabolic activity of exoelectrogens, suitability of the electrode material for bio film formation, efficiency of electrode materials in harvesting the electrons and finally the electron shuttle system.7 The prime and foremost constraint of microbial fuel cells is its low power output as compared to the conventional fuel cells. This limitation is mainly incurred due to ohmic losses, activation losses and concentration losses etc.8 The second major limitation for MFC’s commercialization is the high installation cost. The aforesaid mentioned ohmic resistance problem is resolved by decreasing the electrode spacing and increasing the conductivity of analyte. Where else the activation losses are eliminated using three dimensional electrode configurations. The latter concentration losses are reduced by modifying the operation and surface characteristics of the electrode system and electrode material i.e., rotating electrode system9 and increasing the porosity of anode.10 The major installation cost of MFC in commercial scale is incurred by the proton exchange membrane and platinum used in cathode catalyst. Both these limitations are being worked out by using alternatives like polybenzenidizole,11 poly ether ketone, polystyrene12 in PEM and MnO2, MnS2, bio cathodes as non-platinum cathode catalyst. Alternatively novel osmotic MFCs are developed using forward osmosis membrane in place of cation exchange membrane showing better proton transport.13 In the present scenario all these modifications have dramatically improved the power output from less than 1mW/m2 to maximum of 4W/m2 .8 Most recent advancement in MFC technology includes modification and optimisation of various operating parameters. A novel system employing multiple anode chambers but single cathode chamber showed better power production and COD removal as compared to conventional microbial fuel cells.14 Various conductive polymers like polyaniline, PEDOT,15 polypyrrole etc. have been used as anode modifiers to improve anode’s biocompatibility.10 Fluidized capacitive activated carbon granule was used as a bio anode, for a noble and cost effective reactor configuration.16 MOFs can be used as cathode catalyst","PeriodicalId":15247,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biosensors and Bioelectronics","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biosensors and Bioelectronics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/IJBSBE.2018.04.00124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Abstract
Microbial fuel cell or microbial electrochemical cell is a novel and sustainable approach to harvest electricity through biological route. It utilises organic rich wastewater with predominately carbohydrates as an electrolyte and thereby paradigm has been shifted, as the waste is metabolised to electrical energy.1 The MFC combines the conventional electrochemical cell with the bio-catalytic actions of microbes to harvest the bio-electricity. The idea of metabolicelectricity was first proposed by Potter in 1911 to draw electricity by utilization of bio-catalytic activity of exoelectrogens.2 In recent years, it has emerged as a multidimensional technology owing to its numerous advantages over the both conventional energy resources and existing wastewater treatment system. In addition, this versatile utility has great affinity to remove the total nitrogen, BOD and COD and can be utilized as biosensor to evaluate the organics.3 Moreover, this emerging technology is significantly devoted to alleviate the environmental stress associated in the emission of greenhouse gases into the environment. Also the world’s demand for energy per capita is surging annually proportionate to the economic growth of the nation in order to leap their industrial and technical advancement. Hence, this emerging green technology could be an intensive alternative to reduce the burden of increased energy crisis and meet the societal needs.4 As it is well known that most conventional wastewater treatment technology is not as efficient to remove the substantial amount of pollutants from grey water.5 Moreover, these adopts expensive technologies employing sophisticated instruments, infrastructures and occupies huge land area. Thus adopting MFCs instead of the above said conventional process would be a preferable option to harvest apparently pollution-free energy from wastewater. However, before leaping the technology to commercial level significant enhancement need to be undertaken as an intensive concern by researchers to develop a robust system.5 For an instance, implementation of two stage MFC in the place traditional single stages is a most simple prevailing alternative. Provided the two stage has to be constructed with inert material along with intact proton exchange membrane and a high potential electrode.3, 6 The functional properties of MFC would depends upon the metabolic activity of exoelectrogens, suitability of the electrode material for bio film formation, efficiency of electrode materials in harvesting the electrons and finally the electron shuttle system.7 The prime and foremost constraint of microbial fuel cells is its low power output as compared to the conventional fuel cells. This limitation is mainly incurred due to ohmic losses, activation losses and concentration losses etc.8 The second major limitation for MFC’s commercialization is the high installation cost. The aforesaid mentioned ohmic resistance problem is resolved by decreasing the electrode spacing and increasing the conductivity of analyte. Where else the activation losses are eliminated using three dimensional electrode configurations. The latter concentration losses are reduced by modifying the operation and surface characteristics of the electrode system and electrode material i.e., rotating electrode system9 and increasing the porosity of anode.10 The major installation cost of MFC in commercial scale is incurred by the proton exchange membrane and platinum used in cathode catalyst. Both these limitations are being worked out by using alternatives like polybenzenidizole,11 poly ether ketone, polystyrene12 in PEM and MnO2, MnS2, bio cathodes as non-platinum cathode catalyst. Alternatively novel osmotic MFCs are developed using forward osmosis membrane in place of cation exchange membrane showing better proton transport.13 In the present scenario all these modifications have dramatically improved the power output from less than 1mW/m2 to maximum of 4W/m2 .8 Most recent advancement in MFC technology includes modification and optimisation of various operating parameters. A novel system employing multiple anode chambers but single cathode chamber showed better power production and COD removal as compared to conventional microbial fuel cells.14 Various conductive polymers like polyaniline, PEDOT,15 polypyrrole etc. have been used as anode modifiers to improve anode’s biocompatibility.10 Fluidized capacitive activated carbon granule was used as a bio anode, for a noble and cost effective reactor configuration.16 MOFs can be used as cathode catalyst