Microbial fuel cell: a prospective sustainable solution for energy and environmental crisis

P. Mukherjee, P. Mishra, P. Saravanan
{"title":"Microbial fuel cell: a prospective sustainable solution for energy and environmental crisis","authors":"P. Mukherjee, P. Mishra, P. Saravanan","doi":"10.15406/IJBSBE.2018.04.00124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Microbial fuel cell or microbial electrochemical cell is a novel and sustainable approach to harvest electricity through biological route. It utilises organic rich wastewater with predominately carbohydrates as an electrolyte and thereby paradigm has been shifted, as the waste is metabolised to electrical energy.1 The MFC combines the conventional electrochemical cell with the bio-catalytic actions of microbes to harvest the bio-electricity. The idea of metabolicelectricity was first proposed by Potter in 1911 to draw electricity by utilization of bio-catalytic activity of exoelectrogens.2 In recent years, it has emerged as a multidimensional technology owing to its numerous advantages over the both conventional energy resources and existing wastewater treatment system. In addition, this versatile utility has great affinity to remove the total nitrogen, BOD and COD and can be utilized as biosensor to evaluate the organics.3 Moreover, this emerging technology is significantly devoted to alleviate the environmental stress associated in the emission of greenhouse gases into the environment. Also the world’s demand for energy per capita is surging annually proportionate to the economic growth of the nation in order to leap their industrial and technical advancement. Hence, this emerging green technology could be an intensive alternative to reduce the burden of increased energy crisis and meet the societal needs.4 As it is well known that most conventional wastewater treatment technology is not as efficient to remove the substantial amount of pollutants from grey water.5 Moreover, these adopts expensive technologies employing sophisticated instruments, infrastructures and occupies huge land area. Thus adopting MFCs instead of the above said conventional process would be a preferable option to harvest apparently pollution-free energy from wastewater. However, before leaping the technology to commercial level significant enhancement need to be undertaken as an intensive concern by researchers to develop a robust system.5 For an instance, implementation of two stage MFC in the place traditional single stages is a most simple prevailing alternative. Provided the two stage has to be constructed with inert material along with intact proton exchange membrane and a high potential electrode.3, 6 The functional properties of MFC would depends upon the metabolic activity of exoelectrogens, suitability of the electrode material for bio film formation, efficiency of electrode materials in harvesting the electrons and finally the electron shuttle system.7 The prime and foremost constraint of microbial fuel cells is its low power output as compared to the conventional fuel cells. This limitation is mainly incurred due to ohmic losses, activation losses and concentration losses etc.8 The second major limitation for MFC’s commercialization is the high installation cost. The aforesaid mentioned ohmic resistance problem is resolved by decreasing the electrode spacing and increasing the conductivity of analyte. Where else the activation losses are eliminated using three dimensional electrode configurations. The latter concentration losses are reduced by modifying the operation and surface characteristics of the electrode system and electrode material i.e., rotating electrode system9 and increasing the porosity of anode.10 The major installation cost of MFC in commercial scale is incurred by the proton exchange membrane and platinum used in cathode catalyst. Both these limitations are being worked out by using alternatives like polybenzenidizole,11 poly ether ketone, polystyrene12 in PEM and MnO2, MnS2, bio cathodes as non-platinum cathode catalyst. Alternatively novel osmotic MFCs are developed using forward osmosis membrane in place of cation exchange membrane showing better proton transport.13 In the present scenario all these modifications have dramatically improved the power output from less than 1mW/m2 to maximum of 4W/m2 .8 Most recent advancement in MFC technology includes modification and optimisation of various operating parameters. A novel system employing multiple anode chambers but single cathode chamber showed better power production and COD removal as compared to conventional microbial fuel cells.14 Various conductive polymers like polyaniline, PEDOT,15 polypyrrole etc. have been used as anode modifiers to improve anode’s biocompatibility.10 Fluidized capacitive activated carbon granule was used as a bio anode, for a noble and cost effective reactor configuration.16 MOFs can be used as cathode catalyst","PeriodicalId":15247,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biosensors and Bioelectronics","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biosensors and Bioelectronics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/IJBSBE.2018.04.00124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Microbial fuel cell or microbial electrochemical cell is a novel and sustainable approach to harvest electricity through biological route. It utilises organic rich wastewater with predominately carbohydrates as an electrolyte and thereby paradigm has been shifted, as the waste is metabolised to electrical energy.1 The MFC combines the conventional electrochemical cell with the bio-catalytic actions of microbes to harvest the bio-electricity. The idea of metabolicelectricity was first proposed by Potter in 1911 to draw electricity by utilization of bio-catalytic activity of exoelectrogens.2 In recent years, it has emerged as a multidimensional technology owing to its numerous advantages over the both conventional energy resources and existing wastewater treatment system. In addition, this versatile utility has great affinity to remove the total nitrogen, BOD and COD and can be utilized as biosensor to evaluate the organics.3 Moreover, this emerging technology is significantly devoted to alleviate the environmental stress associated in the emission of greenhouse gases into the environment. Also the world’s demand for energy per capita is surging annually proportionate to the economic growth of the nation in order to leap their industrial and technical advancement. Hence, this emerging green technology could be an intensive alternative to reduce the burden of increased energy crisis and meet the societal needs.4 As it is well known that most conventional wastewater treatment technology is not as efficient to remove the substantial amount of pollutants from grey water.5 Moreover, these adopts expensive technologies employing sophisticated instruments, infrastructures and occupies huge land area. Thus adopting MFCs instead of the above said conventional process would be a preferable option to harvest apparently pollution-free energy from wastewater. However, before leaping the technology to commercial level significant enhancement need to be undertaken as an intensive concern by researchers to develop a robust system.5 For an instance, implementation of two stage MFC in the place traditional single stages is a most simple prevailing alternative. Provided the two stage has to be constructed with inert material along with intact proton exchange membrane and a high potential electrode.3, 6 The functional properties of MFC would depends upon the metabolic activity of exoelectrogens, suitability of the electrode material for bio film formation, efficiency of electrode materials in harvesting the electrons and finally the electron shuttle system.7 The prime and foremost constraint of microbial fuel cells is its low power output as compared to the conventional fuel cells. This limitation is mainly incurred due to ohmic losses, activation losses and concentration losses etc.8 The second major limitation for MFC’s commercialization is the high installation cost. The aforesaid mentioned ohmic resistance problem is resolved by decreasing the electrode spacing and increasing the conductivity of analyte. Where else the activation losses are eliminated using three dimensional electrode configurations. The latter concentration losses are reduced by modifying the operation and surface characteristics of the electrode system and electrode material i.e., rotating electrode system9 and increasing the porosity of anode.10 The major installation cost of MFC in commercial scale is incurred by the proton exchange membrane and platinum used in cathode catalyst. Both these limitations are being worked out by using alternatives like polybenzenidizole,11 poly ether ketone, polystyrene12 in PEM and MnO2, MnS2, bio cathodes as non-platinum cathode catalyst. Alternatively novel osmotic MFCs are developed using forward osmosis membrane in place of cation exchange membrane showing better proton transport.13 In the present scenario all these modifications have dramatically improved the power output from less than 1mW/m2 to maximum of 4W/m2 .8 Most recent advancement in MFC technology includes modification and optimisation of various operating parameters. A novel system employing multiple anode chambers but single cathode chamber showed better power production and COD removal as compared to conventional microbial fuel cells.14 Various conductive polymers like polyaniline, PEDOT,15 polypyrrole etc. have been used as anode modifiers to improve anode’s biocompatibility.10 Fluidized capacitive activated carbon granule was used as a bio anode, for a noble and cost effective reactor configuration.16 MOFs can be used as cathode catalyst
微生物燃料电池:能源和环境危机的可持续解决方案
微生物燃料电池或微生物电化学电池是一种新型的、可持续的通过生物途径获取电能的方法。它利用富含有机的废水,主要是碳水化合物作为电解质,因此模式已经转变,因为废物被代谢成电能MFC结合了传统的电化学电池和微生物的生物催化作用来收集生物电。代谢电的概念最早是由波特在1911年提出的,他利用外生电的生物催化活性来发电近年来,由于其与传统能源和现有废水处理系统相比具有许多优势,它已成为一种多维技术。此外,该多功能工具对去除总氮、BOD和COD有很大的亲和力,可以用作生物传感器来评价有机物此外,这一新兴技术显著地致力于减轻温室气体排放到环境中的环境压力。此外,世界人均能源需求每年都在飙升,与国家的经济增长成正比,以实现工业和技术的飞跃。因此,这种新兴的绿色技术可以成为减轻日益严重的能源危机负担和满足社会需求的一种强有力的替代方案众所周知,大多数传统的废水处理技术都不能有效地从灰水中去除大量的污染物此外,这些采用昂贵的技术,采用先进的仪器和基础设施,占用巨大的土地面积。因此,采用mfc代替上述传统工艺将是一个更好的选择,从废水中收集明显无污染的能源。然而,在将技术提升到商业水平之前,研究人员需要进行重大的改进,以开发一个强大的系统例如,在传统的单阶段MFC中实现两阶段MFC是最简单的替代方案。假设两级必须由惰性材料以及完整的质子交换膜和高电位电极构成。MFC的功能特性取决于外源电的代谢活性、电极材料对生物膜形成的适用性、电极材料收集电子的效率以及最终的电子穿梭系统与传统燃料电池相比,微生物燃料电池的主要和最重要的限制是其低功率输出。这种限制主要是由于欧姆损耗、活化损耗和浓度损耗等造成的。8 MFC商业化的第二个主要限制是安装成本高。通过减小电极间距和增加分析物的电导率来解决上述欧姆电阻问题。在其他地方,使用三维电极结构消除了激活损失。后一种浓度损失可以通过改变电极系统和电极材料的操作和表面特性,即旋转电极系统9和增加阳极的孔隙率10来减少工业规模MFC的主要安装成本是质子交换膜和阴极催化剂使用的铂。通过在PEM中使用聚苯二唑、11聚醚酮、聚苯乙烯和MnO2、MnS2等生物阴极作为非铂阴极催化剂,这些限制都得到了解决。另外,利用正向渗透膜代替阳离子交换膜开发了新型渗透性mfc,显示出更好的质子传输在目前的情况下,所有这些改进都极大地提高了功率输出,从不足1mW/m2到最大4W/m2。8 MFC技术的最新进展包括修改和优化各种操作参数。与传统的微生物燃料电池相比,采用多个阳极室和单个阴极室的新型系统具有更好的发电量和COD去除率各种导电聚合物如聚苯胺、PEDOT、聚吡咯等被用作阳极改性剂,以提高阳极的生物相容性流态化电容活性炭颗粒被用作生物阳极,这是一种高贵且经济有效的反应器配置mof可以用作阴极催化剂
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信