A Comparative Study of the Static and Dynamic Characteristics of Jute and Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polyester Composites

IF 1.5 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
M. Rizal, A.Z. Mubarak, T.R. Alhaidar
{"title":"A Comparative Study of the Static and Dynamic Characteristics of Jute and Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polyester Composites","authors":"M. Rizal,&nbsp;A.Z. Mubarak,&nbsp;T.R. Alhaidar","doi":"10.1007/s40799-023-00655-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Natural and synthetic fiber-reinforced composites are currently being applied in practically every engineering subfield. Therefore, this study was conducted to compare the static and dynamic behaviors of composite materials produced using jute and glass fiber-reinforced polyesters. This was achieved by evaluating their static mechanical parameters such as elastic modulus, tensile strength, flexural strength, and critical buckling load. Impulse Excitation Method (IET) was also used to determine the dynamic elastic and shear modulus as well as the damping performance of the composite under dynamic response. The results showed that the tensile strength of glass fiber-reinforced polyester (GFRP) was 38.19% higher than the jute fiber-reinforced polyester (JFRP). Meanwhile, both composites had comparable mechanical properties such as almost the same flexural strength. The IET tests conducted also showed that the dynamic shear modulus and damping performance of both composites had a similar level of effectiveness. This means non-destructive tests such as the IET test can be used to determine the properties of a composite board quantitatively as well as to monitor the structural integrity of the board and the quality of its fabrication.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":553,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Techniques","volume":"48 2","pages":"229 - 237"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40799-023-00655-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Natural and synthetic fiber-reinforced composites are currently being applied in practically every engineering subfield. Therefore, this study was conducted to compare the static and dynamic behaviors of composite materials produced using jute and glass fiber-reinforced polyesters. This was achieved by evaluating their static mechanical parameters such as elastic modulus, tensile strength, flexural strength, and critical buckling load. Impulse Excitation Method (IET) was also used to determine the dynamic elastic and shear modulus as well as the damping performance of the composite under dynamic response. The results showed that the tensile strength of glass fiber-reinforced polyester (GFRP) was 38.19% higher than the jute fiber-reinforced polyester (JFRP). Meanwhile, both composites had comparable mechanical properties such as almost the same flexural strength. The IET tests conducted also showed that the dynamic shear modulus and damping performance of both composites had a similar level of effectiveness. This means non-destructive tests such as the IET test can be used to determine the properties of a composite board quantitatively as well as to monitor the structural integrity of the board and the quality of its fabrication.

Abstract Image

黄麻和玻璃纤维增强聚酯复合材料静态和动态特性比较研究
目前,天然纤维和合成纤维增强复合材料实际上已被应用于各个工程子领域。因此,本研究对使用黄麻和玻璃纤维增强聚酯生产的复合材料的静态和动态行为进行了比较。具体方法是评估它们的静态机械参数,如弹性模量、拉伸强度、弯曲强度和临界屈曲载荷。此外,还采用脉冲激励法(IET)测定了复合材料在动态响应下的动态弹性模量、剪切模量和阻尼性能。结果表明,玻璃纤维增强聚酯(GFRP)的拉伸强度比黄麻纤维增强聚酯(JFRP)高 38.19%。同时,两种复合材料的机械性能相当,如抗弯强度几乎相同。所进行的 IET 测试还表明,两种复合材料的动态剪切模量和阻尼性能具有相似的效果。这意味着 IET 试验等非破坏性试验可用于定量确定复合板的性能,以及监测复合板的结构完整性和制造质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Experimental Techniques
Experimental Techniques 工程技术-材料科学:表征与测试
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
88
审稿时长
5.2 months
期刊介绍: Experimental Techniques is a bimonthly interdisciplinary publication of the Society for Experimental Mechanics focusing on the development, application and tutorial of experimental mechanics techniques. The purpose for Experimental Techniques is to promote pedagogical, technical and practical advancements in experimental mechanics while supporting the Society''s mission and commitment to interdisciplinary application, research and development, education, and active promotion of experimental methods to: - Increase the knowledge of physical phenomena - Further the understanding of the behavior of materials, structures, and systems - Provide the necessary physical observations necessary to improve and assess new analytical and computational approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信