R. Shrestha, Shova Kunwar, Suman Gurung, A. Pokharel
{"title":"Usefulness of prostate specific antigen density in detecting prostate carcinoma: A hospital-based study in patients with prostate biopsies","authors":"R. Shrestha, Shova Kunwar, Suman Gurung, A. Pokharel","doi":"10.3126/jpn.v12i1.41841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Prostate-specific antigen density has been suggested to enhance the diagnostic efficacy of serum prostate-specific antigen alone in detecting prostate cancer, thereby reducing unnecessary biopsies and associated morbidities. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of prostate-specific antigen density in detecting prostate cancer.\nMaterials and methods: A retrospective analysis of histologically proven benign and malignant prostate diseases, submitted in the histopathology department was performed from April 2019 to March 2020. The diagnostic performance of prostate-specific antigen density was assessed and its optimum cut-off value was determined using the receiver operating characteristic curves. The diagnostic efficacy of prostate-specific antigen density was also compared with prostate-specific antigen in detecting prostate cancer.\nResults: The AUC to predict prostate cancer was 0.89 (95% CI 0.79-0.98. p <0.001) for prostate-specific antigen density. The diagnostic performance of prostate-specific antigen density at cut-off 0.18 ng/ml/cc was better than prostate-specific antigen alone (AUC, 0.838 vs 0.662). Sensitivity was 80% for both prostate-specific antigen density at cut-off 0.18 ng/ml/cc and prostate-specific antigen. But, prostate-specific antigen density had a higher specificity of 87.7 % than prostate-specific antigen (52.3%)and thus it could better distinguish benign diseases from prostate cancer. It would have reduced unnecessary biopsy by 35%.\nConclusions: The diagnostic efficacy of prostate-specific antigen density was good and it was found to be a better predictor of prostate cancer at the cut-off value of 0.18ng/ml/cc when compared to prostate-specific antigen alone.","PeriodicalId":31517,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathology of Nepal","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathology of Nepal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/jpn.v12i1.41841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Prostate-specific antigen density has been suggested to enhance the diagnostic efficacy of serum prostate-specific antigen alone in detecting prostate cancer, thereby reducing unnecessary biopsies and associated morbidities. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of prostate-specific antigen density in detecting prostate cancer.
Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis of histologically proven benign and malignant prostate diseases, submitted in the histopathology department was performed from April 2019 to March 2020. The diagnostic performance of prostate-specific antigen density was assessed and its optimum cut-off value was determined using the receiver operating characteristic curves. The diagnostic efficacy of prostate-specific antigen density was also compared with prostate-specific antigen in detecting prostate cancer.
Results: The AUC to predict prostate cancer was 0.89 (95% CI 0.79-0.98. p <0.001) for prostate-specific antigen density. The diagnostic performance of prostate-specific antigen density at cut-off 0.18 ng/ml/cc was better than prostate-specific antigen alone (AUC, 0.838 vs 0.662). Sensitivity was 80% for both prostate-specific antigen density at cut-off 0.18 ng/ml/cc and prostate-specific antigen. But, prostate-specific antigen density had a higher specificity of 87.7 % than prostate-specific antigen (52.3%)and thus it could better distinguish benign diseases from prostate cancer. It would have reduced unnecessary biopsy by 35%.
Conclusions: The diagnostic efficacy of prostate-specific antigen density was good and it was found to be a better predictor of prostate cancer at the cut-off value of 0.18ng/ml/cc when compared to prostate-specific antigen alone.