Efficient Chemical Coagulation-Electrocoagulation-Membrane Filtration Integrated Systems for Baker's Yeast Wastewater Treatment: Experimental and Economic Evaluation

Hossein Nouri Alavijeh , Morteza Sadeghi , Mohammad Reza Khavari Kashani , Ahmad Moheb
{"title":"Efficient Chemical Coagulation-Electrocoagulation-Membrane Filtration Integrated Systems for Baker's Yeast Wastewater Treatment: Experimental and Economic Evaluation","authors":"Hossein Nouri Alavijeh ,&nbsp;Morteza Sadeghi ,&nbsp;Mohammad Reza Khavari Kashani ,&nbsp;Ahmad Moheb","doi":"10.1016/j.clce.2022.100032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present study provides technical and economic comparisons of electrocoagulation (EC), chemical coagulation (CC), integrated EC-CC, and combinations of these techniques with ultrafiltration (UF) and nanofiltration (NF) systems based on baker's yeast wastewater treatment. Key parameters such as initial pH, coagulant dosage, and stirring speed were optimized for both EC and CC methods to achieve higher removal efficiencies at lower operating costs. Evaluating EC and CC indicates EC obtained better performance by removing 77.64% and 97.49% of COD and turbidity, respectively, but higher operating costs for treating baker's yeast wastewater. CC with operating costs of 0.737$/m<sup>3</sup> and 1.427 $/m<sup>3</sup> using lime and polyaluminum chloride (PACl), respectively, is more cost-effective than EC with total operating costs of 3.526 $/m<sup>3</sup>. This study was the first to compare the capital costs of EC and CC, and it was revealed that CC still required less investment than EC. The combination of EC and CC methods was studied for the first time on baker's yeast wastewater. The results showed that combining CC and EC improves COD removal efficiency by 11.2% and 16.1% when compared to single EC and single CC processes, respectively. Two types of hollow fiber membranes made of polypropylene (PP) and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) for the UF process and a polyamide spiral membrane for the NF system were employed in membrane filtration integrated systems. The combination of the EC-CC system with the UF and NF systems resulted in the highest COD removal efficiency, which was around 99.7% for the EC-CC(PACl)-PVDF-NF system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100251,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Chemical Engineering","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100032"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772782322000304/pdfft?md5=0468a9dc711175eea43db8bc68b23b08&pid=1-s2.0-S2772782322000304-main.pdf","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772782322000304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The present study provides technical and economic comparisons of electrocoagulation (EC), chemical coagulation (CC), integrated EC-CC, and combinations of these techniques with ultrafiltration (UF) and nanofiltration (NF) systems based on baker's yeast wastewater treatment. Key parameters such as initial pH, coagulant dosage, and stirring speed were optimized for both EC and CC methods to achieve higher removal efficiencies at lower operating costs. Evaluating EC and CC indicates EC obtained better performance by removing 77.64% and 97.49% of COD and turbidity, respectively, but higher operating costs for treating baker's yeast wastewater. CC with operating costs of 0.737$/m3 and 1.427 $/m3 using lime and polyaluminum chloride (PACl), respectively, is more cost-effective than EC with total operating costs of 3.526 $/m3. This study was the first to compare the capital costs of EC and CC, and it was revealed that CC still required less investment than EC. The combination of EC and CC methods was studied for the first time on baker's yeast wastewater. The results showed that combining CC and EC improves COD removal efficiency by 11.2% and 16.1% when compared to single EC and single CC processes, respectively. Two types of hollow fiber membranes made of polypropylene (PP) and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) for the UF process and a polyamide spiral membrane for the NF system were employed in membrane filtration integrated systems. The combination of the EC-CC system with the UF and NF systems resulted in the highest COD removal efficiency, which was around 99.7% for the EC-CC(PACl)-PVDF-NF system.

Abstract Image

高效化学混凝-电混凝-膜过滤综合系统处理面包酵母废水:实验和经济评价
本研究对电混凝(EC)、化学混凝(CC)、综合电混凝(EC -CC)以及这些技术与超滤(UF)和纳滤(NF)系统组合处理面包酵母废水进行了技术和经济比较。优化了EC法和CC法的关键参数,如初始pH值、混凝剂投加量和搅拌速度,以降低运行成本实现更高的去除效率。对EC和CC的评价表明,EC处理面包酵母废水的COD去除率为77.64%,浊度去除率为97.49%,效果较好,但运行成本较高。使用石灰和聚合氯化铝(PACl), CC的运行成本分别为0.737美元/m3和1.427美元/m3,比EC的总运行成本为3.526美元/m3更具成本效益。本研究首次比较了电子商务和CC的资本成本,发现CC仍然比EC需要更少的投资。首次研究了EC法与CC法联合处理面包酵母废水。结果表明,与单一EC和单一CC工艺相比,CC和EC联合处理的COD去除率分别提高了11.2%和16.1%。采用超滤(UF)工艺用聚丙烯(PP)和聚偏氟乙烯(PVDF)两种中空纤维膜和纳滤(NF)工艺用聚酰胺螺旋膜作为膜过滤集成系统。EC-CC系统与UF和NF系统联合使用,COD去除率最高,EC-CC(PACl)-PVDF-NF系统去除率约为99.7%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信