Tumor grade and symptoms at presentation are survival risk factors in Chinese patients with primary retroperitoneal sarcoma

Aobo Zhuang, Yuan Fang, Michal Heger, Lijie Ma, Jing Xu, Jiongyuan Wang, Wei-Qi Lu, H. Tong, Yuhong Zhou, Yong Zhang
{"title":"Tumor grade and symptoms at presentation are survival risk factors in Chinese patients with primary retroperitoneal sarcoma","authors":"Aobo Zhuang, Yuan Fang, Michal Heger, Lijie Ma, Jing Xu, Jiongyuan Wang, Wei-Qi Lu, H. Tong, Yuhong Zhou, Yong Zhang","doi":"10.18053/jctres.08.202206.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim: No cohort studies have been performed on Chinese primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) patients. Data derived from western cohort studies may not be directly superimposable on Asian counterparts. Furthermore, the risk factors for survival of RPS are currently unknown for Chinese patients. The objectives were therefore to (1) gain insight into RPS incidence and patient demographics and clinical details; (2) determine the risk factors for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS); and (3) critically appraise the Asian cohort data in relation to information obtained in western cohort studies. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, the health records of patients that had been diagnosed with primary localized RPS with curative intent between 2009 and 2020 were analyzed. Cox proportional hazards analysis was conducted to evaluate the risk factors for OS and DFS. Results: A total of 261 patients met the inclusion criteria. Ninety-six (36.8%) patients had been diagnosed with well-differentiated liposarcoma, 63 patients (24.1%) with dedifferentiated liposarcoma, 41 patients (15.7%) with leiomyosarcoma (LMS), 22 patients (8.4%) with solitary fibroma, 7 patients (2.7%) with malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST), and 32 patients (12.3%) with another type of RPS. The study further revealed that (1) the 5-y OS and DFS in RPS patients was 67.8% and 51.3%, respectively, with the highest OS and DFS observed in MPNST (100% and 100%, respectively) and the lowest 5-y OS and DFS attributed to LMS (42.6% and 28.9%, respectively); (2) symptoms at presentation, Federal National Cancer Center (FNCLCC) grade, and number of combined resections are independent risk factors in OS; (3) symptoms at presentation, FNCLCC grade, chemotherapy, and hospital length of stay are independent risk factors for DFS; and (4) patients at high risk (symptoms at presentation and high-grade tumors) have less than half the chance of survival at 5 y post-diagnosis than patients with a low-risk profile. Conclusions: Symptoms at presentation constitute a risk factor for OS and DFS. When combined with tumor grade - another risk factor for both OS and DFS - patients can be classified into a high-risk and low-risk category to gauge a patient’s prognosis and, accordingly, frame an optimal clinical trajectory. Moreover, the clinicopathology and overall prognosis of RPS in Asian and Western populations are comparable and hence superimposable. Relevance for Patients: The present study identifies the risk factors of survival in RPS and suggests symptoms at presentation should be considered in the preoperative consultation and added in prognostic grouping.","PeriodicalId":15482,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Research","volume":"69 1","pages":"584 - 593"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18053/jctres.08.202206.016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aim: No cohort studies have been performed on Chinese primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) patients. Data derived from western cohort studies may not be directly superimposable on Asian counterparts. Furthermore, the risk factors for survival of RPS are currently unknown for Chinese patients. The objectives were therefore to (1) gain insight into RPS incidence and patient demographics and clinical details; (2) determine the risk factors for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS); and (3) critically appraise the Asian cohort data in relation to information obtained in western cohort studies. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, the health records of patients that had been diagnosed with primary localized RPS with curative intent between 2009 and 2020 were analyzed. Cox proportional hazards analysis was conducted to evaluate the risk factors for OS and DFS. Results: A total of 261 patients met the inclusion criteria. Ninety-six (36.8%) patients had been diagnosed with well-differentiated liposarcoma, 63 patients (24.1%) with dedifferentiated liposarcoma, 41 patients (15.7%) with leiomyosarcoma (LMS), 22 patients (8.4%) with solitary fibroma, 7 patients (2.7%) with malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST), and 32 patients (12.3%) with another type of RPS. The study further revealed that (1) the 5-y OS and DFS in RPS patients was 67.8% and 51.3%, respectively, with the highest OS and DFS observed in MPNST (100% and 100%, respectively) and the lowest 5-y OS and DFS attributed to LMS (42.6% and 28.9%, respectively); (2) symptoms at presentation, Federal National Cancer Center (FNCLCC) grade, and number of combined resections are independent risk factors in OS; (3) symptoms at presentation, FNCLCC grade, chemotherapy, and hospital length of stay are independent risk factors for DFS; and (4) patients at high risk (symptoms at presentation and high-grade tumors) have less than half the chance of survival at 5 y post-diagnosis than patients with a low-risk profile. Conclusions: Symptoms at presentation constitute a risk factor for OS and DFS. When combined with tumor grade - another risk factor for both OS and DFS - patients can be classified into a high-risk and low-risk category to gauge a patient’s prognosis and, accordingly, frame an optimal clinical trajectory. Moreover, the clinicopathology and overall prognosis of RPS in Asian and Western populations are comparable and hence superimposable. Relevance for Patients: The present study identifies the risk factors of survival in RPS and suggests symptoms at presentation should be considered in the preoperative consultation and added in prognostic grouping.
原发性腹膜后肉瘤的肿瘤分级和发病时的症状是中国患者生存的危险因素
背景与目的:尚未对中国原发性腹膜后肉瘤(RPS)患者进行队列研究。来自西方队列研究的数据可能无法与亚洲同类数据直接重叠。此外,影响中国患者RPS生存的危险因素目前尚不清楚。因此,研究目标是:(1)深入了解RPS发病率、患者人口统计学和临床细节;(2)确定总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)的危险因素;(3)批判性地评估亚洲队列数据与西方队列研究中获得的信息的关系。方法:采用回顾性队列研究方法,对2009年至2020年诊断为原发性局限性RPS并有治疗目的患者的健康记录进行分析。采用Cox比例风险分析评价OS和DFS的危险因素。结果:261例患者符合纳入标准。高分化脂肪肉瘤96例(36.8%),去分化脂肪肉瘤63例(24.1%),平滑肌肉瘤(LMS) 41例(15.7%),孤立性纤维瘤22例(8.4%),恶性周围神经鞘瘤7例(2.7%),其他类型RPS 32例(12.3%)。研究进一步发现(1)RPS患者5-y OS和DFS分别为67.8%和51.3%,其中MPNST患者的OS和DFS最高(分别为100%和100%),LMS患者5-y OS和DFS最低(分别为42.6%和28.9%);(2)首发症状、联邦国家癌症中心(FNCLCC)分级和联合切除次数是发生OS的独立危险因素;(3)首发症状、FNCLCC分级、化疗和住院时间是DFS的独立危险因素;(4)高风险患者(出现症状和高级别肿瘤)在诊断后5年的生存机会不到低风险患者的一半。结论:发病时的症状构成OS和DFS的危险因素。当结合肿瘤分级(OS和DFS的另一个危险因素)时,可以将患者分为高风险和低风险类别,以评估患者的预后,并相应地构建最佳临床轨迹。此外,亚洲和西方人群中RPS的临床病理和总体预后具有可比性,因此具有重叠性。与患者的相关性:本研究确定了RPS患者生存的危险因素,并建议在术前咨询时应考虑出现的症状,并将其纳入预后分组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信